Interprofessional supervision: a matter of difference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id278Keywords:
interprofessional supervision, choice, process, benefits, limitations, social workAbstract
INTRODUCTION: With its origins grounded in the apprenticeship tradition it is perhaps notsurprising that social work adheres to a model of supervision where both supervisor and supervisee are social workers and where it is common for social workers to be supervised by their line manager. Interprofessional supervision, where the participants do not share the same profession, and which is frequently external to the social worker’s organisation, therefore presents a challenge to traditional social work supervision practice.
METHODS: Expert stakeholders were interviewed to explore their experiences of
interprofessional supervision. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and topdown analysis employed to identify themes. The views of nine supervisees and nine supervisors are reported.
FINDINGS: The participants represented a range of professions but the data collected revealed common themes. Participants highlighted the importance of being able to choose a supervision partner and to establish a contract where lines of accountability were explicit. Knowledge about supervision was considered vital and supervision competence was expected of the supervisor.
The key benefits were a greater understanding of one’s own profession and an appreciation and respect for difference. Lack of clinical accountability was considered a limitation but not an obstacle.
CONCLUSION: The reports of these participants indicate a shift from supervision as an in-house process to one which is chosen, negotiated and collaborative. Through their awareness of the need for professional development and accountability, the participants demonstrated a depth of professional responsibility and an ability to stand alongside their profession in the presence of ‘other’.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2015). Supervision policy. Retrieved from http://anzasw.nz/anzasw-publications-2/
Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2014). AASW supervision standards. Canberra, ACT: Author.
Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (1994). The status of supervision: Reflections from a training perspective. Social Work Review, 6(5/6), 16–21.
Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision: Current themes and models for practice. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Beddoe, L., & Howard, F. (2012). Interprofessional supervision in social work and psychology: Mandates and (inter) professional relationships. The Clinical Supervisor, 31(2), 178–202. doi:10.1080/07325223.2013.730471
Berger, C., & Mizrahi, T. (2001). An evolving paradigm of supervision within a changing healthcare environment. Social Work in Health Care, 32(4), 1–18.
Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2006). Clinical supervision in social work. The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1), 49–67.
Bogo, M., Paterson, J., Tufford, L., & King, R. (2011). Interprofessional clinical supervision in mental health and addiction: Toward identifying common elements. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 124–140.
Clark, P. G. (2006). What would a theory of interprofessional education look like? Some suggestions for developing a theoretical framework for teamwork training. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20(6), 577–589. doi:10.1080/13561820600916717
Cooper, L., & Anglem, J. (2003). Clinical supervision in mental health. Adelaide, SA: Australian Centre for Community Services Research, Flinders University.
Crocket, K., Cahill, F., Flanagan, P., Franklin, J., McGill, R., Stewart, A., … Mulcahy, D. (2009). Possibilities and limits of cross-disciplinary supervision. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 29(2), 25–43.
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2008). Interprofessional learning for supervision: “Taking the blinkers off.” Learning in Health and Social Care, 8(1), 58–69. doi:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00197
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2015). Interprofessional supervision: Opportunities and challenges. In L. Bostock (Ed.), Interprofessional staff supervision in adult health and social care services (Vol. 1, pp. 37–41). Brighton, UK: Pavilion Publishing.
Egan, R., Maidment, J., & Connolly, M. (2015). Who is watching whom? Surveillance in Australian social work supervision. British Journal of Social Work, 1–19. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv098
Gillig, P. M., & Barr, A. (1999). A model for multidisciplinary peer review and supervision of behavioural health clinicians. Community Mental Health Journal, 35(4), 361–365.
Globerman, J., White, J., & McDonald, G. (2002). Social work in restructuring hospitals: Program management five years later. Health & Social Work, 27(4), 274–284.
Hair, H. J. (2013). The purpose and duration of supervision, and the training and discipline of supervisors: What social workers say they need to provide effective services. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1562–1588. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs071
Hair, H. J. (2014). Power relations in supervision: Preferred practices according to social workers. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 95(2), 107–114.
Hutchings, J., Cooper, L., & O’Donoghue, K. (2014). Cross-disciplinary supervision amongst social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(4), 53–64.
Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2013). Content and purpose of supervision in social work practice in England: Views of newly qualified social workers, managers and directors. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 52–68.
Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(Part 4), 437–447.
Morrison, T., & Wonnacott, J. (2010). Building foundations for best practice. Supervision: now or never, reclaiming reflective supervision in social work. Retrieved from ttp://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=545d7e64-f5b1-43a0-b4cb-46a03c7acce6&groupId=10180
Mullarkey, K., Keeley, P., & Playle, J. F. (2001). Multiprofessional clinical supervision: Challenges for mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8(3), 205–211.
O’Donoghue, K. (2004). Social workers and cross-disciplinary supervision. Social Work Review, 16(3), 2–7.
O’Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. doi:10.1080/17525098.2015.1039172
O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R., & Trlin, A. (2005). Mapping the territory: Supervision within the Association. Social Work Review, 17(4), 46–64.
O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M.-s. (2012). Towards a professional supervision culture: The development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1), 5–28.
Payne, M. (1994). Personal supervision in social work. In A. Connor & S. E. Black (Eds.), Performance review and quality in social care (pp. 43–58). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Rains, E. (2007). Interdisciplinary supervisor development in a community health service. Social Work Review, 19(3), 58–65.
Rich, P. (1993). The form, function and content of clinical supervision: An integrated model. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 137–178.
Simmons, H., Moroney, H., Mace, J., & Shepherd, K. (2007). Supervision across disciplines: Fact or fantasy. In D. Wepa (Ed.), Clinical supervision in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A health perspective (pp. 72–86). Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2013). Supervision expectations for registered social workers: Policy statement. Retrieved from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/policy
Strong, J., Kavanagh, D., Wilson, J., Spence, S. H., Worrall, L., & Crow, N. (2004). Supervision practice for allied health professionals within a large mental health service. The Clinical Supervisor, 22(1), 191–210. doi:10.1300/J001v22n01_13
Townend, M. (2005). Interprofessional supervision from the perspectives of both mental health nurses and other professionals in the field of cognitive behavioural psychotherapy. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 12(5), 582–588.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
