Biopolitics, complex systems theory and ecological social work: Conceptualising ways of transitioning to low carbon futures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss4id290Keywords:
Transition Town movement, biopolitics, complex systems theory, ecological social work, deep ecologyAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Social work is engaged with understanding and acting into change processes within society at various levels. How new social and environmental movements are conceptually framed can be usefully explored to enable new ways of understanding their role in change processes, particularly in addressing the most significant problem of our times, climate change and excessive non-renewable energy use.
METHODS: Complex systems theory and deep ecology are two of the theoretical conceptualisations that inform the Transition Town movement transnationally. Social workers share these two theoretical frameworks with the Transition Town movement as ways of thinking about effecting change processes. A brief introduction to a biopolitical lens, based on Lemke’s reading of Michel Foucault is added to offer another way to conceptualise the movement’s naturalistic logic.
CONCLUSION: A biopolitical lens seeks to make visible the precarious and contingent difference between nature and culture as well as politics and life. Biopolitical analytics aims to focus social workers on investigating the network of power relations, knowledge practices and modes of subjectification evident in change processes. The intersection of life and politics has transformed modern society and biopolitics aims to bring this into focus to understand what we are doing to ourselves.
References
Aiken, G. T. (2016). Prosaic state governance of community low carbon transitions. Political Geography, 55, 20–29.
Astyk, S. (2007). ‘The theory of anyway’. Energy Bulletin, January 25. Retrieved from http://www.energybulletin.net/node/25115
Australian Association of Social Workers (2010). Code of Ethics. Canberra, Australia: Author.
Bailey, I., Hopkins, R., & Wilson, G. (2010). Some things old some things: The spatial representation and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement. Geoforum, 41(4), 595–605. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.08.007
Bay, U. (2013). Transition town initiatives promoting transformational community change in tackling peak oil and climate change challenges. Australian Social Work, 66(2), 171–186. Retrieved from doi:10.1080/0312407x.2013.781201
Besthorn, F. (2012). Deep ecology’s contribution to social work: A ten-year retrospective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(3), 248–259. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00850.x
Brunetta, G., & Baglione, V. (2013). Resilience in the Transition Town movement. Towards a new urban governance. TEMA, 6(2), 251–264.
Chamberlin, S. (2009). The transition timeline: For a local, resilient future. Foxhole, Darlington, United Kingdom: Green Books.
Coady, N., & Lehmann, P. (2016). An overview of and rationale for a generalist-eclectic approach to direct social work practice. In N. Coady & P. Lehmann (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach, 3rd ed.(pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Coates, J. (2003). Ecology and social work: Toward a new paradigm. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
Connolly, M., & Harms, L. (2015). Social work: From theory to practice, 2nd ed. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
Connors, P., & McDonald P. (2011). Transitioning communities: community, participation and the Transition Town Movement. Community Development Journal, 46(4), 558–572.
Corcoran, J. (2016). Solution-focused therapy. In N. Coady & P. Lehmann (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach, 3rd ed.(pp. 435–452). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Cretney, R., Thomas, A., & Bond, S. (2016). Maintaining grassroots activism: Transition Towns in Aotearoa. New Zealand Geographer, 72(2), 81–91.
Dalby, S. (2013). Biopolitics and climate security in the Anthropocene. Geoforum, 49, 184–192. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.013
Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler's analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 425–438.
Dominelli, L. (2012). Green social work: From environmental crisis to environmental justice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
Fabian, R. (2016). Sophy Banks on the heart of transition. Kosmos Journal. June 14, 2016 Newsletter Online. Retrieved from https://www.kosmosjournal.org/news/sophy-banks-on-the-heart-of-transition/
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 252–267.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: Ani. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). The birth of biopolitics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity, and truth(pp. 73–79). New York, NY: New Press.
Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France. New York, NY: Picador Press.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Gray, M., Coates, J., & Hetherington, T.(Eds.). (2013). Environmental social work. New York, NY: Routledge.
Harrison, K. (2013). Building resilient communities. Journal of Media and Culture, 16(5). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/716
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
Hopkins, R. (2008). The transition handbook: From oil dependency to local resilience. Totnes, Devon, United Kingdom: Green Books.
Hopkins, R., & Lipman, P. (2009). Who we are and what we do. Transition Network.Org Retrieved from http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/who_we_are_high.pdf
Ife, J. (2016). Community development in an uncertain world: Vision, analysis and practice. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, D. R. (2008). Deep ecology: Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy. 2006–2011. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/OtherOrgs/AppalFor/Readings/240%20-%20Reading%20-%20Deep%20Ecology.pdf
Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An advanced introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Macy, J. (2005). World as lover, world as self. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.
Marion (2012). Sophy banks on heart and soul groups. Transition Town Media. Retrieved from https://transitiontownmedia.org/sophy-banks-heart-soul-groups/
Morar, N., & Koopman, C. (2012). The birth of the concept of biopolitics: A critical notice of Lemke’s biopolitics. Theory and Event, 15(4). The Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from Project MUSE.
Satre, J. P. (1982). Critique of dialectical reason. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
Seyfang, G. (2009). Green shoots of sustainability: The 2009 UK transition town movement survey. University of East Anglia. Retrieved from http://www.transitionnetwork.org/resources/gill-seyfang-green-shoots-sustainability-2009-transition-movement-survey
Thompson, N. (2002). Social movement, social justice and social work. British Journal Social Work, 32(6), 711–722.
Trainer, T. (2010). The Transition Town movement: Its huge significance and a friendly criticism. Culture Change. Retrieved from http://www.culturechange.org/cms/content/view/605/1/
Transition Network (2016a). Transition initiatives directory. Retrieved from http://www.transitionnetwork.org/initiatives
Transition Network (2016b). The essential guide to doing transition. Retrieved from http://transitionnetwork.org/resources/essential-guide-transition/
Transition Towns Aotearoa New Zealand (2014). What are transition towns? Retrieved from http://www.transitiontowns.org.nz/node/1667
Zapf, M. (2009). Social work and the environment: Understanding people and place. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
