Innovation and graphic facilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss4id298Keywords:
innovative practice, social work, creativity, graphic facilitation, rich picturesAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Social work practice includes the facilitation of effective communication in planning, solution finding, developing shared understandings and collaborative decision making with individuals, families, colleagues and professionals and community groups. Changing social contexts require innovations and new approaches to practice.
METHODS: This article proposes that graphic facilitation (Sibbett, 1977, 2002) can be used as a way of enhancing social work practice by promoting anti-oppressive practice (Dominelli, 2002) and collaborative partnerships (Bracht, Kingsbury, & Rissel, 1999; Roose, Roets, Van Houte, Vandenhole, & Reynaert, 2013) and thinking differently (Gambrill, 2013). Graphic facilitation is a practice that produces “rich pictures” (Checkland, 1981) to elicit and record information in a responsive and innovative way. Drawing on examples from practice, illustrations of the use of graphic facilitation will be presented in two contexts: person-centred planning and World Café.
FINDINGS: Literature supports the effectiveness of using graphics to develop a visual language and produce a “rich picture” that is easily understood and remembered. The use of pictures can stimulate new meaning and insight, and promote reflection and deep learning (Checkland, 1981; Horan, 2000). Graphic facilitation has been reported to increase engagement, understanding and result in a more energised process to bring about change.
CONCLUSIONS: Graphic facilitation is a method that can be added to a social work tool-box. The examples provided demonstrate the potential capacity of this approach to support individuals and groups in different, creative and innovative ways.
References
Agerbeck, B. (2012). The graphic facilitator’s guide. Chicago, IL: Loosetooth.com Library.
Amando, A. N., & McBride, M. (2001). Increasing person-centered thinking: Improving the quality of person-centered planning: A manual for person-centered planning facilitators. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
Amering, M., & Schmolke, M. (2009). Recovery in mental health: Reshaping scientific and clinical responsibilities. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Anderson, C. J., & Imperia, G. (1992). The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals. International Journal of Business Communications, 29(2), 113–128.
Armstrong, T. (1987). In their own way. New York, NY: Tarcher Press.
Armstrong, M., & Dorsett, P. (2015). Panning for gold: The personal journey of mental health wellness and its relationship with Planning Alternatives Tomorrows with Hope (PATH). Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(2), 36–50.
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2012). How people use rich pictures. In Open University Colloquium. Pictures to help people think and act, 07 March 2012, Open University, Milton Keynes.Blakeney, B., Carleton, P., McCarthy, C., & Coakley, E. (2009). Unlocking the power of innovation. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 14(2), Manuscript 1.
Bracht, N., Kingsbury, L., & Rissel, C. (1999). A five-stage community organisational model for health promotion. In N. Bracht (Ed.), Health promotion at the community level-2-new advances (pp. 83–104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Breton, M. (1994). On the meaning of empowerment and empowerment-oriented social work practice. Social Work With Groups, 17(3), 23-37. doi:10.1300/J009v17n03_03
Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koelher.
Brown, L. (2010). Balancing risk and innovation to improve social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1211–1228.
Bunker, B., & Alban, B. (1997). Large group interventions: Engaging the whole system for rapid change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Chenoweth, L., & McAuliffe, D. (2015). The road to social work and human service practice: An introductory text, 4th ed. Southbank, VIC, Australia: Thomson.
Coholic, D. A., & Eys, M. (2016). Benefits of an arts-based mindfulness group intervention for vulnerable children. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(1), 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0431-3
Congleton, C. (2011). Action research at LILA: Exploring the role of graphic facilitation in adult learning. Retrieved from http://www.think-incolour.com.au/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/Congleton_AR-final_5-11.pdf
Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive practice in context. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates, 2nd ed. (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Palgrave.
DuBois, B., & Miley, K. (2011). Social work: An empowering profession, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Espiner, D. A., & Guild, D. (2008). Turning up the volume: Young adults reflect on their secondary school experience. In C. Rubie-Davies & C. Rawlinson (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 244–271). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Espiner, D. A., & Guild, D. (2011). The circle of courage in transition planning. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 20(2), 44–49. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2292/11301
Espiner, D., & Hartnett, F. M. (2012). “I felt I was in control of the meeting”: Facilitating planning with adults with an intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), 62–70. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00684.x
Espiner, D. A., & Guild, D. (2012). Capturing what matters most: Engaging students and their families in educational planning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(5), 56–67.
Fouché, C., & Light, G. (2011). An invitation to dialogue: The World Café in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 10(1), 28–48. doi:10.1177/1473325010376016
Gambrill, E. (2013). Social work practice: A critical thinker's guide, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: Theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gilgun, J. F. (2005). The 4-D: Strengths-based assessment instruments for youth their families and communities. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 10(4), 454–473.
Graber, D. A. (1989). Content and meaning: What’s it all about? The American Behavioral Scientist, 33(2), 144–152.
Hafford-Letchfield, T., Lambley, S., Spolander, G., & Cocker, C. (2014). Inclusive leadership in social work and social care. Bristol, United Kingdom: Policy Press.
Hick, S. (2002). Introduction to anti-oppressive practice: Challenges for social work. Critical Social Work, 3, 1. Retrieved from http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/2002-volume-3-no-1
Ho, R. T. H., Potash, J. S., Ho, A. H. Y., Ho, V. F. L., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2016). Reducing mental illness stigma and fostering empathic citizenship: Community arts collaborative approach. Social Work in Mental Health. doi:10.1080/15332985.2016.1236767
Hooper, K., Low, J., & Kearins, H. (2003). Pictures in New Zealand annual reports: Winner & losers. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 3(2), 83–107.
Horan, P. (2000).Using rich pictures in information systems teaching. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management (pp. 257–262). Geelong, Australia.
Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language: Global communication for the 21st century. Bainbridge Island: MacroVU Press. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~rhorn/SpchPackard.html
Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 55(1), 84–93. doi:10.1177/039219210708791
Jones, M. J., & Shoemaker, P. A. (1994). Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142–184.
Känkänen, P., & Bardy, M. (2014). Life stories and arts in child welfare: Enriching communication. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(1), 37–51. doi:10.1080/2156857x.2013.781536
Kelly, S. (2005). The benefits of using graphic recording/graphic facilitation. Retrieved from http://www.theworldcafe.com/pdfs/graphicBenefits.pdf
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2002). Charting your company’s future. Harvard Business Review, 7–83.
Mauzey, J., & Harriman, R. (2003).Creativity inc: Building an inventive organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
McCashen, W. (2005). The strengths approach. Bendigo, VIC, Australia: St. Luke's Innovative Resources.
McKitterick, B. (2015). Self-leadership in social work: Reflections from practice. Chicago, IL: Policy Press.
Mendoza Straffon, L. (2014). Art in the making: The evolutionary origins of visual art as a communication signal. Department of Art History, Leiden University Centre for the Arts in Society (LUCAS), Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands .
Merkley, C. (2005). The history and evolution of the graphic facilitation/recording field.
Retrieved from http://www.makemark.com/articles/
Mullen, K., & Thompson, J. (2013). Graphic recording: Using vivid visuals to communicate climate change. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 23. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/023/3/023034.html
Nandan, M., London, M., & Bent-Goodley, T. (2015). Social workers as social change agents: Social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 39(1), 38–56. doi:10.1080/23303131.2014.955236
Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory, 4th ed. Houndsmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillian.
Pearpoint, J., O’Brien, J., & Forest, M. (1995). PATH: A workbook for planning positive possible futures. Toronto, ONT: Inclusion Press.
Roam, D. (2009). Unfolding the napkin: The hands-on method for solving complex problems with simple pictures. London, England: Portfolio.
Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.ipmr.net ©International Public Management Network.
Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centred therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London, United Kingdom: Constable.
Roose, R., Roets, G., Van Houte, S., Vandenhole, W., & Reynaert, D. (2013). From parental engagement to the engagement of social work services: Discussing reductionist and democratic forms of partnership with families. Child and Family Social Work, 18, 449–457 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00864
Sakamoto, I., & Pitner, R. (2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: Disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 435–452. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch190Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296–305. doi:10.1093/sw/41.3.296
Sanderson, H. (2000). Person-centred planning: Key features and approaches. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Sanderson Associates (n.d.). Person-centred thinking tools. Retrieved from http://www.helensandersonassociates.co.uk/person-centred-practice/person-centred-thinking-tools/
Sibbett, D. (1977). “I see what you mean!” A guide to group graphics. San Francisco, CA: Author.
Sibbett, D. (2002). The facilitator’s handbook: A quick guide to inclusion facilitation. Nottingham, United Kingdom: Inclusion Solutions.
Sibbett, D. (2008). Visual intelligence: Using the deep patterns of visual language to build cognitive skills. Theory into Practice, 47(2), 118–127. doi:10.1080/00405840801992306
Sibbett, D. (2010). Visual meetings: How graphics, stick notes and idea mapping can transform group productivity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Simpson, L. (2000). The annual report: An exercise in ignorance? Accounting Forum, 24(3), 231–247.
Steenkamp, N., & Hooks, J. (2011). Does including pictorial disclosure of intellectual capital resources make a difference? Pacific Accounting Review, 23(1), 52–58.
Tierney, P. R. (2003). The competitive advantages of rich media. Special Supplement to E Content and Information Today, June, S4–S5. Retrieved from http://www.econtentmag.com/Downloads/Whitepapers/jun03/tierney.pdf
Tyler, C., Valek, L., & Rowland, R. (2005).Graphic facilitation and large-scale interventions supporting dialogue between cultures at a global, multicultural, interfaith event. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 139–152. doi:10.1177/0021886304272850
Valenza, C., & Adkins, J. (2009). Understanding visual thinking: The history and future of graphic facilitation. Interactions, 16(4), 38–43. doi:10.1145/1551986.1551994
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense-making in organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Williams, V., Porter, S., & Marriott, A. (2014). Your life, your choice: Support planning led by disabled people's organisations. British Journal of Social Work, 44(5), 1197–1215.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
