Women’s experiences of intimate partner violence in rural Taranaki, Aotearoa New Zealand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss1id533Keywords:
rural, intimate partner violence, patriarchy, structural violenceAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, research about intimate partner violence has focused on urban areas and has been urban-centric. However, there are some components of intimate partner violence in rural communities which are different and social workers need to be aware of these variances.
METHODS: The findings presented in this article were drawn from a doctoral study in which 23 women and five men were interviewed using a qualitative approach. Alongside these interviews, key informants in the rural Taranaki district were consulted, a fieldwork journal kept and photographs taken. The data were analysed using applied thematic analysis.
FINDINGS: Patriarchy was a distinct aspect of the intimate partner violence experienced by the women who participated in this study and part of the back-drop to lives. Hegemonic masculinity was a powerful contributor to the intimate partner violence experienced by some study participants. Geographic isolation was exploited as an aspect of control in intimate partner violence among the women and women had difficulty accessing services.
CONCLUSION: It is important for social workers, in order to practise competently, to have an awareness of the impact of patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity. When working in rural communities, social workers need to be attentive to the factors which impact rural women who have experienced intimate partner violence, and how these factors might differ from those that impact urban women’s experiences.
References
Averett, P. (2009). The search for wonder women: An autoethnography of feminist identity. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 24 (4). 360–368. doi:10.1177/0886109909343569
Babbie, E. (2017). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning.
Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver J. R., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2). doi:10.1177/0146167208331161
Bryson, V. (1992). Feminist political theory: An introduction. Hampshire, UK: MacMillan.
Campbell, H. (2006). Real men, real locals, and real workers: Realizing masculinity in small-town New Zealand. In H. Campbell, M. M. Bell, & M. Finney (Eds.). Country boys: Masculinity and rural life (pp. 87–103). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Campbell, H., Bell, M. M., & Finney, M. (2006). Masculinity and rural life: An introduction. In H. Campbell, M. M. Bell, & M. Finney (Eds.). Country boys: Masculinity and rural life (pp. 1–22). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Connell, R. W. (2002). Masculinities and globalisation. In H. Worth, A. Paris, & L. Allen (Eds.), The life of Brian: Masculinities, sexualities and health in New Zealand (pp. 27–42). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 93–109). Newbury Park, London: Sage.
Crichton-Hill, Y., & Taylor, A. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In A. Taylor & M. Connolly (Eds.), Understanding violence: Context and practice in the human services (pp. 102–117). Christchurch, NZ: Canterbury University Press.
Davidson, C., & Tolich, M. (2003). Competing traditions. In C. Davidson & M. Tolich (Eds.), Social science research in New Zealand: Many paths to understanding (pp. 23–38). Auckland, NZ: Pearson.
Edwards, K. M., Mattingly, J. J., Dixon, K. J., & Banyard, V. L. (2014). Community matters: Intimate partner violence among rural young adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 198–207. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9633-7
Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9780857020246.n2
Faber, N., & Miller-Cribbs, J. E. (2014). Violence in the lives of rural, southern, and poor white women. Violence Against Women, 20(5), 517–538. doi:10.1177/1077801214535104
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781483384436.n3
Hall-Sanchez, A. (2016). Intimate partner violence against rural women: The current and future state of feminist empirical and theoretical contributions. Sociology Compass, 10(4), 272–283. doi:10.1111/soc4.12358
hooks, b. (1982). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
Jewkes, R., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., Lundqvist, E., Blackbeard, D., Lindegger, G.,… Gottzén, L. (2015). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 112–127. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094
Letherby, G. (2003). Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Little, J. (2017). Understanding domestic violence in rural spaces: A research agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 472–488. doi:10.1177/0309132516645960
Mammen, S., & Sano, Y. (2012). Gaining access to economically marginalized rural populations: Lessons learned from nonprobability sampling. Rural Sociology, 77(3), 462–482. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00083.x
Mason, R. (2012). Dealing with violence: Families living in rural settlements. In J. Maidment & U. Bay (Eds.), Social work in rural Australia: Enabling practice (pp. 119–132). Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
May, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process (4th ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Millett, K. (1971). Sexual politics. London, Great Britain: Virago.
New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse. (2017). Supplementary data: Regional data by police district. Retrieved from https://nzfvc.org.nz/data-summaries/supplementary-data-regional-data-police-district
Pease, B. (2016). Interrogating privilege and complicity in the oppression of others. In B. Pease, S. Goldingay, N. Hosken, & S. Nipperess (Eds.), Doing critical social work: Transformative practices for social justice (pp. 89–103). Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Pringle, R. (2002). Living the contradictions: A Foucauldian examination of my youthful rugby experiences. In H. Worth, A. Paris, & L. Allen (Eds.), The life of Brian: Masculinities, sexualities and health in New Zealand (pp. 57–72). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
Rennison, C. M., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2017). Situational contexts of rural violence: A comparison of male and female perpetration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(2), 189–206. doi:10.1177/1043986216688813
Sadler, G. R., Lee, H-C., Lim, R. S-H., & Fullerton, J. (2010). Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nursing and Health Sciences, 12, 369–374. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010/00541.x
Statistics New Zealand (n.d.). 2013 QuickStats about a place: Stratford District. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-about-a-place.aspx?request_value=14148&tabname=
Young, I. M. (2003). Feminist reactions to the contemporary security regime. Hypotia, 18(1), 223–231.
Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453
Wendt, S. (2009). Constructions of local culture and impacts on domestic violence in an Australian rural community. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.11.001
Wendt, S., Chung, D., Elder, A., Hendrick, A., & Hartwig, A. (2017). Seeking help for domestic and family violence: Exploring regional, rural, and remote women’s coping experiences: Key findings and future directions. Compass: Research to Policy and Practice, 6. Retrieved from https://www.anrows.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RP.14.04_Rural_Compass_FINAL_1709-1.pdf
Wendt, S., & Zannettino, L. (2015). Domestic violence in diverse contexts: A re-examination of gender [e-book]. London, UK: Routledge.
Whelehan, I. (1995). Modern feminist thought: From the second wave to “post-feminism”. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Women’s Refuge New Zealand. (2015). Statistical report. Women’s Refuge Annual Report 2014–2015. Retrieved from https://womensrefuge.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Domestic-violence-statistics-NZ.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
