Privileging participation in the Pacific: Researcher reflections

Authors

  • Kate Saxton Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id606

Keywords:

participatory action research, neocolonialism, social work research, Pacific Islands, Indigenous, cross-cultural practice

Abstract

This researcher reflection examines the challenges faced in using participatory action research (PAR) as a methodology when researching social work in Fiji. PAR allows for disadvantaged groups to engage in research and social action as a means to address inequity. However, PAR relies on people’s ability and desire to participate in this process of change. The epistemological roots of PAR are well suited to Western notions of democracy and power, conflicting with how society operates within Fiji. This reflection examines some of the challenges faced in conducting PAR due to this cultural clash. In conducting this research, the researcher was forced to engage in deep and, at times, confronting, reflections about identity and positionality as both a critical social worker and researcher. By using a PAR approach as the starting point for research design and implementation, the research not only failed to empower Fijian social workers but at times replicated a form of neo-colonialism.

References

Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2012). Competing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Faleolo, M. (2013). Authentication in social work education: The balancing act. In C. Noble, M. Hendrickson, & I. Y. Han (Eds.), Social work education: Voices from the Asia Pacific (2nd ed., pp. 149-172). Sydney, NSW: University of Sydney Press.

Farrelly, T., & Nabobo-Baba, U. (2014). Talanoa as empathic apprenticeship. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 319–330. doi:10.1111/apv.12060

Finau, S. A. (1995). Health research in the Pacific: In search of a reality. New Zealand Medical Journal, 108, 16–19.

Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kee, L. H., Martin, J., & Ow, R. (2014). Cross-cultural social work: local and global. South Yarra, VIC: MacMillan Education Australia.

Lockwood, V. (2003). Globalization and culture change in the Pacific Islands. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Mackenzie, J., Tan, P. H., Hoverman, S., & Baldwin, C. (2012). The value and limitations of participatory action research methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.008

McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pacific Health Research Council (PRHC). (2003). Pacificentric health research methods. Anthology Series No.1, Suva, Fiji: Fiji School of Medicine.

Pryor, J., Finau, S., & Tukuitonga, C. (2000). Pacific Health Research Council: Health research by and for Pacificans. Pacific Health Dialogue, 7, 115–117.

Ravulo, J. (2016). Pacific epistemologies in professional social work practice, policy and research. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26, 191–202. doi:1080/02185385.2016.1234970

Tamasese, K., Peturu, C., Waldegrave, C., & Bush, A. (2005). Ole Taeao Afua, the new morning: A qualitative investigation into Samoan perspectives on mental health and culturally appropriate services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 300–309. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01572.x

Trevithick, P. (2012). Social work skills and knowledge: A practice handbook (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Trnka, S. (2008). State of suffering: Political violence and community survival in Fiji. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Tuinamuana, K. (2007). Reconstructing dominant paradigms of teacher education: Possibilities for pedagogical transformation in Fiji. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 111–127. doi:10.1080/13598660701268544

Vaka, S., Brannelly, T., & Huntington, A. (2016). Getting to the heart of the story: Using talanoa to explore Pacific mental health. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 37(8), 537–544. doi:10.1080/01612840.2016.1186253

Downloads

Published

2019-06-17

How to Cite

Saxton, K. (2019). Privileging participation in the Pacific: Researcher reflections. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 30(4), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss4id606

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 4 (2018): Tu Mau

Section

Viewpoints

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.