Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw <p><strong>Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work</strong> is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for research, analysis and scholarly debate on social work theory, policy and practice.</p> en-US <p><span>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the <em>Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers</em> (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>You and any co-authors</strong></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>First publication</strong></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">By submitting the work you are:</span></p><ol class="ol1"><li class="li1"><span class="s1">granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;</span></li><li class="li1"><span class="s1">confirming that the work is original; and</span></li><li class="li1"><span class="s1">confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.</span></li></ol><p class="p2">Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.</p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Copyright</strong></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">A human-readable summary of the licence is available from<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"><span class="s2"> </span><span class="s3">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</span></a>, which includes a link to the full licence text.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in <em>Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work</em> is acknowledged.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.</span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>The copyright of others</strong></span></p><p class="p1"><span class="s1">If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:</span></p><ol class="ol1"><li class="li1"><span class="s1">falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR</span></li><li class="li1"><span class="s1">that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.</span></li></ol><p class="p2"> </p> e.beddoe@auckland.ac.nz (Liz Beddoe) Neil.Ballantyne@openpolytechnic.ac.nz (Neil Ballantyne) Mon, 16 Dec 2024 13:17:03 +1300 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Practising feminism for social welfare: A global perspective https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1239 <p>Review of <em>Practising feminism for social welfare: A global perspective </em>by Ruth Phillips. Routledge, 2023</p> <p>ISBN: 978-1-138-65068-8, paperback, pp.193, $62.24 (through www.routledge.com)</p> Eileen Joy Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1239 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Becoming Pākehā https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1240 <p>Review of <em>Becoming Pākehā</em> by John Bluck. HarperCollins, 2022</p> <p>ISBN: 9781 7755 42100, paperback, pp.304, $39.99</p> Blake Gardiner Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1240 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Resistance and rangatiratanga in a time of political change https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1236 <p>Editorial in 2 parts: 'Social work, the politics of cruelty and political resistance' by Kendra Cox, Donna Baines, Eileen Joy and<br>Liz Beddoe; and 'On rangatiratanga' by Kendra Cox.</p> Kendra Cox, Donna Baines, Eileen Joy, Liz Beddoe Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1236 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Exploring palliative care debates: Equitable access and the role of social workers https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1170 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>Equity of access to palliative care for older adults and the role of social work are interwoven as older adults are the largest population group requiring end-of-life care and hospice social workers predominantly work alongside older adults. This article explores the intersections of palliative care policy and practice, older adults’ inequitable outcomes, Te Tiriti o Waitangi (1840), and challenges faced by social workers seeking to be effective advocates for older adults.</p> <p><strong>APPROACH: </strong>Undertaking post-graduate study in palliative care allowed for an exploration of the literature and older adults’ experiences of inequity observed in practice through a social work lens. Literature reviews completed during post-graduate study foreground the literature search informing this article. The literature search was completed using University of Canterbury Library and CINAHL Health sciences databases focused on palliative and end-of-life care, older adults and caregivers. Keywords used included <em>literature reviews, palliative or end-of-life, </em><em>older adults or elderly, caregivers or family, psychosocial, New Zealand, caregiver distress</em>, and <em>ageism</em>. Abstracts of articles were reviewed; literature was chosen based on relevance to the topic. Additional literature was sourced through Google Scholar, Google searches of current proposals/reports, and international databases.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>The current Aotearoa New Zealand Ministry of Health (MoH) (2001) Palliative Care Strategy does not effectively respond to older adults’ end-of-life care needs or acknowledge the roles and contributions of social workers within palliative care. Improving older adults’ equity of access to palliative care requires interlinking and prioritising older adults’ end-of-life care and empowering the contributions of social workers.</p> Dallace Lilley, Kate Reid Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1170 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Exploring courage and compassion in social work https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1163 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>Both courage and compassion can contribute to the process of managing adverse situations in social work, particularly where there are high levels of distress or confronting behaviour. Courage can enable social workers to enter and remain engaged in these situations, while compassion can be considered essential to support the relational work required to increase safety and contribute to sustained change. These concepts can also support social worker safety and wellbeing, helping mitigate the emotional impacts of the work.</p> <p><strong>APPROACH: </strong>This article defines and explores the potential application of both courage and compassion to social work practice. The potential contribution of both concepts to sustaining social worker wellbeing, safe practice and personal growth are also identified. The intention of the article is to invite further discussion and articulation of these concepts in social work practice.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Courage and compassion can offer ways to support social workers to be steadfast in their practice, while developing relationships that can contribute to increased wellbeing and safety for both themselves and others. This, in turn, can bring profound rewards through the experiences of vicarious resilience, compassion satisfaction, and even post-traumatic growth. Further application and discussion of these concepts within social work is warranted.</p> Nicki Weld, Liz Beddoe Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1163 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 The Empire Strikes Back: Māori and the 2023 coalition government https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1237 <p>Commentary on the 2023 NZ Govt and its attacks on Māori</p> Anaru Eketone Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1237 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Sustaining the social work workforce in Aotearoa: A whole system challenge https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1232 <p>This viewpoint explores social work workforce information and challenges. </p> Kieran O'Donoghue Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1232 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 The possibilities and dissonances of abolitionist social work https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1200 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>The normative ideal of justice in Aotearoa New Zealand is dominated by the twin pillars of colonialism and carceralism. The expansion and entrenchment of this colonial carceral paradigm is facilitated by auxiliary and complicit social systems. How can social work respond to its position as an element of these systems?</p> <p><strong>APPROACH: </strong>This article uses the three-stage framework of Emancipatory Social Science to examine the harms of carceralism and carceral social work, to offer abolitionist social work as an alternative, and to begin an exploration of the possibilities and dissonances presented by this alternative.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Like carceralism, carceral social work is inherently harmful. However, the alternative praxis of abolitionist social work raises questions for our profession regarding the balancing of immediate relief and wider social change, the potential abolition of many currently accepted forms of social work, and the strengthening or building of non-carceral social works.</p> Erin Silver Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1200 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Emancipatory social work: An anticapitalist perspective https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1203 <p>The global definition of social work, as articulated by the International Federation of Social Workers, states that social work is a practice-based profession and an academic discipline that, amongst other things, promotes the empowerment and liberation of people. The knowledge base for social work has a rich history of different theoretical perspectives, frameworks and practice models that have attempted to highlight key aspects of human oppression, discrimination and marginalisation and tease out the implications for social work practice in these domains. These approaches have included anti-discriminatory practice, anti-oppressive practice, anti-racist practice, and feminist and empowerment perspectives. In the same tradition, this paper draws on the work of&nbsp; US analytical Marxist sociologist,&nbsp; Eric Olin Wright to consider how his concept of <em>emancipatory social science</em> could be harnessed by social work practitioners, researchers and policymakers to advance human emancipation and what this might mean in different practice domains. The article will focus primarily on a close reading of two of Olin Wright’s publications–<em>Envisioning Real Utopias</em> and <em>How to Be an Anticapitalist in the 21st Century</em>. The article argues for the value of <em>emancipation</em> over <em>empowerment</em> as a concept to convey an authentic commitment to human liberation. It also considers the implications of emancipatory social work for relationships with service users in the context of anti-capitalist struggle and discusses the ramifications for decolonising social work practice in a settler colonial state.</p> Neil Ballantyne Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1203 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 “Not social workers, but social fighters”: Navigating the search for macro social work identity in the Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Journal https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1199 <p>Introduction: Given the social work profession’s roots in social justice and recognising the social determinants of wellbeing, macro social work is an essential part of the professional identity.&nbsp; However, macro work is often a marginalised part of the profession because of an increasing focus on clinical work due to the rise of neoliberalism and practical barriers.&nbsp;</p> <p>Methods: To better understand macro social work’s place in the profession, this research sought to assess the historical and current discourses surrounding macro social work in Aotearoa New Zealand. To do this, a qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis was conducted on publications of the Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Journal since it began in 1965 to 2020. This meta-synthesis was one part of a broader study on macro social work for a PhD thesis.</p> <p>Findings: The analysis focused on finding journal articles that relate to macro social work to generate themes around how social workers think and feel about the place of macro social work in the profession. Themes around historical trends, scope of practice and the status of the profession were discussed in the context of macro social work and social change. The themes illuminated key tensions between micro and macro social work in the professional identity.</p> <p>Conclusions: This article makes a case for bridging the divide between micro and macro work and increasing the discussion of macro social work in the professional discourse in the Journal and beyond. &nbsp;</p> Olivia LaMontagne, Yvonne Crichton-Hill, Jane Maidment Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1199 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 Galvanising criticality: Analysing trans health policy in a hostile political context https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1211 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>Pathologisation has long provided the architecture for governing access to gender-affirming medical care. An explicit orientation towards human rights in the latest revision of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s (WPATH) Standards of Care is an important success in achieving trans depathologisation. This development is the result of sustained efforts by trans activists who have been dismantling pathologising structures and practices in the face of intensifying opposition and vitriolic attacks.</p> <p><strong>METHODS: </strong>We present findings from the comparison of approaches to depathologisation in the WPATH Standards for Care, version 7 (SOC-7), and an alternative best-practices guide created by the Spanish Network for Depathologization of Trans Identities (the Guide) using the What’s the Problem Represented to be? (WPR) approach to policy analysis. This WPR analysis is informed by trans and First Nations policy workers, scholars, and activists. This methodological–conceptual approach is used to explore uncertainties about the limits of a liberal rights model in the Guide.</p> <p><strong>FINDINGS: </strong>Situating rights in the broader field of governing logics indicates that, although this approach seeks to replace harmful practices, it does little to address underlying colonial mechanisms. Noticing uncertainty supported consideration of the dynamic ways that medicalisation and rights, liberalism and neoliberalism, and colonial power are sustained in trans health policy.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION: </strong>In an increasingly hostile context, when uncertainty about the transformative capacity of human rights necessarily shifts focus, returning to trans analytics provides solid ground for deepening interrogation of the colonial conditions of care to enable full depathologisation to unfold.</p> Rebecca Howe Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1211 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 “Suicide prevention … I hate that word.” Women’s experiences of carceral logics whilst supporting loved ones with suicidal distress in rural Australia https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1198 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>Modern neoliberal states discipline subjects through diffuse operations of state power by making individuals both the object of and subject of disciplinary gaze. Constructions of activities like caring, which are overwhelmingly performed by women, are devalued and marginalised.</p> <p><strong>METHODS: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with carers and workers and volunteers in the welfare and community sector from a rural part of Eastern Australia.</p> <p><strong>FINDINGS: </strong>Women’s experiences of the mainstream mental health system are characterised by carceral logics which limit women’s choice and their relationships with their loved ones, yet some women resist through enacting a form of relational feminist justice.</p> <p><strong>IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:</strong> This study contributes to broader literature on women’s embodied experiences of legislation and critical mental health scholarship on the harms of coercion in the mental health system in many modern neoliberal states. I encourage social workers practising in neoliberal settings to critically reflect on the impact of carceral logics on women who support loved ones with suicidal distress, and I discuss ways social work practice can promote social justice through centring mutuality in relationships.</p> Charlotte Finlayson Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1198 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300 The impact of studying social work on student social wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand: Struggling with incongruent demands https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1214 <p><strong>INTRODUCTION: </strong>Social work education places many demands on students, including dealing with challenging content, demanding assessment requirements, and long unpaid placements. A growing literature reports that social work students are experiencing social and financial hardship with impacts on their health and wellbeing.</p> <p><strong>METHOD: </strong>A mixed methods study incorporating a survey (<em>n</em> = 353) and 31 semi-structured interviews was conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand in 2019. Participants in the study were then current students or new graduates in their first 2 years of practice.</p> <p><strong>FINDINGS: </strong>The findings reported in this article are drawn from analysis of the responses to the relevant open-ended questions in the survey and the qualitative interviews. Participants reported various challenging impacts of their engagement in a social work qualifying programme. These impacts were felt in their personal and family relationships, social and cultural participation, and physical and emotional wellbeing. Some students reported impacts on their opportunities to participate in social activism.</p> <p><strong>IMPLICATIONS: </strong>These findings confirm, in a local context, those from Australia and elsewhere. It is recommended that professional bodies and social work education providers should urgently address how study in social work could have a less detrimental impact on students. It is vital that we avoid an overly responsiblising emphasis on self-care but rather acknowledge the impact of structural factors. The lack of congruence between social work stated values of social connection and participation and the student experience reported here suggests a dissonance that limits student inclusion and success.</p> Liz Beddoe, Sonya Hunt, Barbara Staniforth, Kendra Cox Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://anzswjournal.nz/anzsw/article/view/1214 Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +1300