The purposes of cultural supervision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol24iss3-4id104Keywords:
supervision, cultural supervisionAbstract
If you are working in the social services sector, over 40 and Māori, chances are that you will have been asked to provide cultural supervision for a younger Māori worker. However, when you ask what do they mean by cultural supervision, after a slightly panicked look, you can get a variety of different answers. They all know that it is supposed to be done, that it is considered important, in fact some are required by their employers or contracts to have it, but until very recently few seem to know what they actually wanted. This article reports on a brief research project as part of a Masters in Social Welfare programme that interviewed Māori social workers and Māori and Pākehā social work managers about their expectations and experiences of cultural supervision. The participants were asked four questions about the purpose of cultural supervision, who should get cultural supervision, the qualities of a cultural supervisor and problems they had encountered in cultural supervision. Four different types of cultural supervision are identifiedDownloads
References
Autagavaia, M. (2000). A Tangata Pasifica supervision process: Authenticating difference. In L. Beddoe & J. Worrell
(Eds.). From rhetoric to reality. Keynote address and selected papers. Conference proceedings. Auckland.
Bradley, J., Jacob, E., & Bradley, R. (1999). Reflections on culturally safe supervision, or why Bill Gates makes more money than we do. Te Komako, Social Work Review, III, XI, (4), pp. 3-6.
Chapman, A. (2002). Social work with clients who are refugees or migrants. In R. Truell, L. Nowland. Reflections on current practice in social work. New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
Community Corrections. (No Date). Guidelines for appointment of cultural professional supervisors.
Dreardon, E. (1997). Matua whakapai tou marae, ka whakapai ai I te marae o te tangata: First set in order your own marae before you clean another. Te Kōmako, Social Work Review, 8, p. 1.
Edwards, J.K., & Chen, M. (2002). Strength-based supervision: Frameworks, current practice and future directions: A wu-wei method. The Family Journal (In press). Retrieved from www.neiu.edu/~jkedward/wu-wei
English, A. (2012). Māori social workers: Experiences within social service organisations. A thesis submitted for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Otago.
Eruera, M. (2005). He Korero Korari, Supervision conference 2004 – Weaving together the strands of supervision. Auckland
University: Faculty of Education.
Kane, R. (2001). Supervision in New Zealand social work. In M. Connolly (Ed.). New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice, pp. 291-303. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Ladyshewsky, R. (1996). Cross cultural clinical supervision/education: The SE Asian experience. In J. Abbott & L. Wilkcoxson (Eds.). Teaching and learning within and across disciplines, 99-104. Proceeding’s of the 5th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University, February 1996. Perth: Murdoch University.
McKinney, J. (2006). A Māori medical model of cultural supervision. NZFP, 33(5), p. 301-304.
O’Donoghue, K. (2000). The future of social work supervision within Aotearoa/New Zealand. A paper presented at the National Supervision Conference, Supervision: From Rhetoric to Reality. July 2000. Auckland: The Auckland College of Education.
Peterson, F. (1991). Issues of race and ethnicity in supervision: Emphasising who you are, not what you know. Winter 1986,
No. 1, The Hayworth Press.
Sarantakos, S. (1993). Social research. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia Pty Ltd.
Walsh-Tapiata, W., & Webster, J. (2004). Do you have a supervision plan? Te Kōmako Social Work Review, VII, pp. 15-19.
Webber-Dreadon, E. (1999). He taonga mo o matou tipuna (A gift handed down by our ancestors): An indigenous approach to social work supervision. Te Kōmako, Social Work Review, III, XI(4), pp. 7-11.
Wong, P., & Wong, L. (No date). Multicultural supervision questionnaires, retrieved from www.twu.ca/cpsy/survey/multi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
