Where to social work in a brave new neoliberal Aotearoa?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss1id111Keywords:
child protection, poverty, neoliberalism, capitalism, history, inequalityAbstract
Uncertainty is embedded in the nature of child protection work, despite the bureaucratic and managerial imperative to eradicate it. The recent focus on the scientific prediction of child abuse within high risk families connects with the neoliberal policy agenda of disciplining the poor and unproductive. Rather than being a new and far-sighted initiative, this policy focus on a dangerous underclass is historically evident within western liberal societies and is particularly prevalent in times of capitalist expansion. Child protection social work in Aotearoa New Zealand is enmeshed with poverty and social deprivation – with the lives of vulnerable families. Current policy initiatives are moving social work towards a stricter policing of the underclass poor. Child ill-treatment is correlated with poverty in the form of inadequate housing, education failure, poor health, low incomes and impoverished communities. It is time to make this clear in a political environment that is bent on divorcing social work from a concern with increasing structural injustice and focusing us on the detection, re-moralisation and/or punishment of deviant abusers. The liberal humanist tradition of social work focuses on the individual redemption of failing subjects. In a punitive neoliberal political environment, this orientation potentially lures social workers into an othering of those who are unable or unwilling to take responsibility for their own moral rehabilitation. We live in pivotal times for social work. This article asks readers to consider the argument put forward and to question where they stand: where might social work be taking you and where would you like to take social work?
References
Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, consumerism, and the new poor. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1999). In search of politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Beddoe, L. (2014). Feral families, troubled families: The rise of the underclass in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology 29(3), 51-68.
Bourdieu, P., Accardo, A., Balaz, G., Beaud, S., Bonvin, F., Bourdieu, E., ... Wacquant, L. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
Callinicos, A. (2010). Bonfire of illusions: The twin crises of the liberal world. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Chambon, A. (1999). Foucault’s approach: Making the familiar visible. In A. Chambon, A. Irving, & L. Epstein (Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 51–83). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
de Haan, I. & Connolly, M. (2014). Another Pandora’s box? Some pros and cons of predictive risk modelling. Children and Youth Services Review. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.07.016
Duncan, G. (2004). Society and politics: New Zealand social policy. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson Education.
Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferguson, I. (2008). Reclaiming social work: Challenging neoliberalism and promoting social justice. London, UK: Sage.
Goldstein, H. (1990). The knowledge base of social work practice: Theory, wisdom, analogue, or art? Families in Society, 7(1), 32-42.
Grey, M., & Webb, S.A. (Eds.), (2013). The new politics of social work. Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gupta, A. (2015). Poverty and child neglect: The elephant in the Room? Families, Relationships and Societies. doi:10.1332/204674315X14207948135699.
Hyslop, I. (2007). Twenty years in an open-necked shirt: A retrospective personal narrative. Social Work Review, XVIX(1), 3–11.
Hyslop, I. (2013). Social work practice knowledge: An enquiry into the nature of the knowledge generated and applied in the practice of social work. PhD thesis: Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10179/5139#sthash.syz7UwA3.dpuf
Jensen, T., & Tyler, I. (2015). ‘Benefits broods’: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare common sense. Critical Social Policy, 35(4), 1-22.
Jones, C. (1983). State social work and the working class. London, UK: Macmillan.
Jordan, B. (2004). Emancipatory social work? Opportunity or oxymoron. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 5-19.
Keddell, E. (2104). The ethics of predictive risk modelling in the Aotearoa/New Zealand child welfare context: Child abuse prevention or neo-liberal tool. Critical Social Policy. doi:10.1177/026101831453224
Ministry of Social Development (2012). The white paper for vulnerable children. Retrieved from https//:www.childrensactionplan.govt.nz/the-white-paper
Morrison, T. (1997). Emotionally competent child protection organizations: Fallacy, fiction or necessity? In J. Bates, R. Pugh, & N. Thompson (Eds.) Protecting children: Challenges & change. Aldershot: Arena.
New Zealand Productivity Commission (2015). More effective social services. Wellington: New Zealand Productivity Commission.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2015). The state of care 2015: What we learnt from monitoring Child, Youth and Family. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http:/www.occ.org.nz/assets/Publications/OCC-State-of-Care-2015.pdf
Parton, N. (2014). The politics of child protection: contemporary developments and future directions. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pelton, L. ( 2015). The continuing role of material factors in child maltreatment and placement. Child Abuse and Neglect, 41, 30-39.
Peel, J. (2012). Comparative policy analysis: Neoliberalising New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 68(3), 151-167.
Perry, B. (2012). Household income in New Zealand: Trends in indicators of inequality and hardship 1982–2011. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/.../household-incomes-report-
-main-report
Philp, M. (1979). Notes on the form of knowledge in social work. Sociological Review, 27(1), 83-111.
Polanyi, K. (1944/1957) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. USA: Beacon Press.
Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Pullen-Sansfacon, A. (2015). Social work and macro-economic neoliberalism: beyond the social justice rhetoric. European Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1066761
Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 35(2), 103-116
Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety: a solution and safety orientated approach to child protection. New York, USA: Norton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
