Horses supporting the social inclusion of young people with disabilities: A case study from Ireland.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol37iss1id1169Keywords:
Equine-assisted services, animal-assisted interventions, social inclusion, disability, vocational training programmes, animal welfareAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are recognised practices useful to enhance the social inclusion of people through interaction with nature and animals. Despite their perceived benefit, much of the preceding literature focuses on the limited evidence base for the impact of AAIs, due to a limited number of studies conducted with randomised control trials. The purpose of this research is to explore the experiences of young people with disabilities engaging in an equestrian training programme in Ireland, showcasing AAIs as a means of social inclusion.
METHODS: This article reports on one component from a PhD on nature-based interventions and the social inclusion of young people in precarious situations. The research was a qualitative, exploratory study involving participant observations of eight young people engaging in the programme, and one semi-structured interview with a programme participant. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.
FINDINGS: An analysis of the data identified four main themes: the importance of the human-animal bond; the natural environment aiding learning; the calming effect of horses on the students; and, centring animal welfare in the programme.
CONCLUSION: This article advocates that social work and relevant disciplines can consider AAIs as innovative and beneficial for some young people engaged in their services, such as for the social inclusion of young people with disabilities. Additionally, this article suggests that, when centring animal welfare guidelines in these programmes, AAIs can also serve to protect the health and wellbeing of the non-human animal involved.
References
Ashby, C. E. (2011). Whose “voice” is it anyway?: Giving voice and qualitative research involving individuals that type to communicate. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1723
Atchley, R. A., Strayer, D. L., & Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051474
Bartram, T., & Cavanagh, J. (2019). Re-thinking vocational education and training: Creating opportunities for workers with disability in open employment. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 71(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1638168
Beetz, A. M. (2017). Theories and possible processes of action in animal assisted interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1262263
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Broom, D. M. (1986). Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal, 142(6), 524–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0
Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., & Shen-Miller, D. (Eds.). (2011). The psychology of the human–animal bond: A resource for clinicians and researchers. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6
Burgon, H. L. (2013). Horses, mindfulness and the natural environment: Observations from a qualitative study with at-risk young people participating in therapeutic horsemanship. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 17(2), 51–67.
Carlin, C., Kindermann, G., Britton, E., Cormican, M., Domegan, C., Gormally, M., & O’Donovan, D. (2020). Nature and environment to attain and restore health (NEAR health) (Report No. 348). https://yourcorporatewellbeing.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Research_Report_348-Oct-2020.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed methods approaches (4th ed.).
SAGE Publications.
Dawkins, M. S. (2006). Through animal eyes: What behaviour tells us. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.010
Eurostat. (2022). Disability: Higher risk of poverty or social exclusion. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20221214-2
Festina Lente. (2024). Our mission. https://www.festinalente.ie/
Fine, A. H. (2011). Understanding the AAT Rx: Applications of AAI in clinical practice. In C. Blazina, G. Boyraz, & D. Shen-Miller (Eds.), The psychology of the human-animal bond: A resource for clinicians and researchers (pp. 125–136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_7
Fine, A. H., & Beck, A. M. (2019). Understanding our kindship with animals: Input for health care professionals interested in the human-animal bond. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (5th ed., pp. 3–12). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00001-8
Glenk, L. M. (2017). Current perspectives on therapy dog welfare in animal-assisted interventions. Animals, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7020007
Gorman, R. (2019). What’s in it for the animals? Symbiotically considering “therapeutic” human-animal relations
within spaces and practices of care farming. Medical Humanities, 45(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1136/
medhum-2018-011627
Government of Ireland. (1996). Partnership 2000 for inclusion, employment and competitiveness. https://www.lenus.ie/bitstream/handle/10147/265792/Partnership%202000%20for%20Inclusion%20Employment%20and%20Competitiveness.pdf
Handlin, L., Hydbring-Sandberg, E., Nilsson, A., Ejdebäck, M., Jansson, A., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2011). Short-term interaction between dogs and their owners: Effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate: An exploratory study. Anthrozoös, 24(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303711X13045914865385
Hatch, A. (2007). The view from all fours: A look at an animal-assisted activity program from the animals’ perspective. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216632
Hauge, H., Kvalem, I. L., Berget, B., Enders-Slegers, M.-J., & Braastad, B. O. (2014). Equine-assisted activities and the impact on perceived social support, self-esteem and self-efficacy among adolescents: An intervention study. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 19(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2013.779587
Heffernan, K. (2017). The effect of an equine assisted therapy (EAT) programme on children’s occupational performance: A pilot study. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-02-2017-0005
International Association of Human-Animal Interaction Organizations (IAHAIO). (2018). IAHAIO white paper 2014, updated for 2018. https://iahaio.org/best-practice/white-paper-on-animal-assisted-interventions/
Jegatheesan, B. (2019). Influence of cultural and religious factors on attitudes toward animals. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (5th ed., pp. 43–49). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00004-3
Jung, S. (2022). Equine-assisted psychotherapy and learning for children: Why horses? In J. A. Courtney, J. L. Langley, L. L. Wonders, R. Heiko, & R. LaPiere (Eds.), Nature-based play and expressive therapies (pp. 136–148). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003152767-15
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kruger, K. A., & Serpell, J. A. (2010). Animal-assisted interventions in mental health. In A. H. Fine (Ed.), Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (3rd ed., pp. 33–48). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10003-0
Latella, D., & Abrams, B. (2019). The role of the equine in animal-assisted interactions. In A. H. Fine (Ed.),
Handbook on animal-assisted therapy (5th ed., pp. 133–162). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00010-9
Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Sahlberg, P., Bentsen, P., Passy, R., Ho, S., Ward, K., & Cowper, R. (2021). A systematic review protocol to identify the key benefits and efficacy of nature-based learning in outdoor educational settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031199
Marlow, C. (2011). Research methods for generalist social work (5th ed.). Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
Matthies, A.-L., Närhi, K., & Ward, D. (Eds.). (2001). The eco-social approach in social work. SoPhi.
Mellor, D. J. (2017). Operational details of the five domains model and its key applications to the assessment and management of animal welfare. Animals, 7(8), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060
Mellor, D. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Littlewood, K. E., McLean, A. N., McGreevy, P. D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020). The 2020 five domains model: Including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10(10), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870
Miller, R. (2000). A brief introduction to holistic education. Infed.org. https://infed.org/mobi/a-brief-introduction-to-holistic-education/
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rogerson, M., Kelly, A., Coetzee, S., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2019). “Doing” adventure: The mental health benefits
of using occupational therapy approaches in adventure therapy settings. In A. A. Donnelly & T. E. MacIntyre. (Eds.), Physical activity in natural settings: Green and blue exercise (pp. 241–255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180144
Seery, R., & Wells, D. (2024). An exploratory study into the backgrounds and perspectives of equine-assisted service practitioners. Animals, 14(2), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020347
Serpell, J., McCune, S., Gee, N., & Griffin, J. A. (2017). Current challenges to research on animal-assisted interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 21(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1262775
Shanahan, D. F., Astell–Burt, T., Barber, E. A., Brymer, E., Cox, D. T. C., Dean, J., Depledge, M., Fuller, R. A., Hartig, T., Irvine, K. N., Jones, A., Kikillus, H., Lovell, R., Mitchell, R., Niemelä, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Pretty, J., Townsend, M., van Heezik, Y., … Gaston, K. J. (2019). Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: The purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports, 7(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7060141
Sheffield, D., & Lumber, R. (2019). Friend or foe: Salutogenic possibilities of the environment. In A. A. Donnelly & T. E. MacIntyre. (Eds.), Physical activity in natural settings: Green and blue exercise (pp. 3–14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180144
Silva, A., Matos, M., & Gonçalves, M. (2023). Nature and human well-being: A systematic review of empirical evidence from nature-based interventions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2023.2227761
Simons, H. (2006). Ethics in evaluation. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 213–232). SAGE Publications. Turunen, P., Matthies, A.-L., Närhi, K., Boeck, T., & Albers, S. (2001). Practical models and theoretical findings in combating social exclusion. In A.-L. Matthies, K, Nähri & D. Ward (Eds.), The eco-social approach to social work (pp. 108–126). SoPhi.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). Article 1 – Purpose. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
Wals, A. E. J. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents’ perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children’s Environments, 11(3), 177–193.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
Wood, W., Alm, K., Benjamin, J., Thomas, L., Anderson, D., Pohl, L., & Kane, M. (2021). Optimal terminology for services in the United States that incorporate horses to benefit people: A consensus document. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 27(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0415
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
