Bi-culturalism and accountability: Fundamental changes in social work practice in Aotearoa New Zealand 1984 – 1990
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss1id118Keywords:
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers, history, anti-racism, accountability, bi-culturalism, registrationAbstract
A number of key events took place in the history of the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) in the mid-1980s and early 1990s. This article explores critical developments and debates in the lead up to the 1986 Turangawaewae conference at which the bi-cultural structure of the Association first emerged. The proceedings of the conference itself are examined and the subsequent establishment of a unique system of accountability for ANZASW members discussed. These events are considered significant in the shaping of the Association’s current structure, bi-lingual Code of Ethics (ANZASW, 2015), its competency assessment processes and in its contribution to the era of professional registration.
While it is impossible to clearly delineate a beginning point, the article picks up the Association’s story in 1984. It is told from the perspective of the first two Manuhiri Caucus Presidents, Sarah Fraser (1986-1988) and Lynne Briggs (1988 – 1990), and gives voice to some of the participants involved through reference to documents and communications of the time. Other than the points at which the histories of the Manuhiri (later renamed as Tau Iwi) and Tangata Whenua (later renamed as Tangata Whenua Takawaenga o Aotearoa) caucuses intersect, it is the authors’ view that the important and ground breaking history of the Tangata Whenua Caucus is not theirs to relate.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (2015). Code of Ethics. New Zealand: Author.
Barretta- Herman, A. (1994). Development of social work in New Zealand: 1969-1988. Part III: Social work development. Social Work Review, March 1994, 12-18.
Beddoe, E. (November 1984). The famous accountability remits. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 14.
Beddoe, E. (August/September 1985). Editorial. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 3-4.
Beddoe, E. (October/November 1985). Editorial. News and Views in Social Work October/November 1985. [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 1.
Beddoe, L., & Randal, H. (1994). The New Zealand Association of Social Workers: The professional response to a decade of change. In R. Mumford & M. Nash (Eds.). Social work in action (pp. 21-36). Palmerston North, New Zealand: The Dunmore Printing Company.
Berridge, D., Cowan, L., Cumberland, T., Davys, A., McDowell, H., Morgan, J. et al (1984). Institutional racism in the Department of Social Welfare: Tamaki-makau-rau. Auckland, New Zealand: Department of Social Welfare. Retrieved from http://www.trc.org.nz/sites/trc.org.nz/files/Institutional%20Racism%20WARAG.pdf
Blagdon, J. (1991). NZASW President’s Report 1990-1991. In NZASW AGM minutes August 1991 [meeting minutes].
Briggs, L. (1988). New Zealand Association of Social Workers’ Qualification in Social Work Practice. Social Work Review, 2, 23.
Briggs, L. & Curson, B. (1993). Foreword. In New Zealand Association of Social Workers, Code of ethics. (pp 3-5). New Zealand: ANZASW.
Cullen, M. (1989) Speech by Hon. Dr Michael Cullen. NZSW Review, 2(2&3), 29.
Daniels, K. (1985). The issue of competency for social work. NZSW Journal, 10(1), 5-7.
Daniels, K. (1989). Ken Daniels’ speech. NZSW Review, 2(2&3), 30.
Davys, A. & Kemp, S. (1984). Editorial. NZSW Journal, 9(1), 1.
Fraser, S. (June, 1987). Manuhiri President’s report. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 1.
Fraser, S. (1988a). President’s report. NZSW Review 1(1), 30-31.
Fraser, S. (1988b). Outgoing President’s report to the 1988 Annual General Meeting. Social Work Review [Supplemental material] September 1988, 3.
Human Rights Commission New Zealand (1982). Race against time: Institutionalised discrimination. New Zealand: New Zealand Government.
Holland, C. (September, 1986). From the Maori caucus of NZASW. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 1.
Interim Board of Competency, Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (1990). Annual report to the ANZASW national conference, July 1990 Nelson.
Manuhiri Caucus, NZASW (August, 1986). Statement on accountability made at Turangawaewae Marae,
Ngaruawhaia, New Zealand. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 3.
Maori Caucus, NZASW (August, 1986). Response from Maori Caucus at Turangawaewae Marae, Ngaruawahia, New Zealand. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 3.
Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare (1988). Puao-te-Ata-tu (daybreak). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government.
Murphy, J. (1985). Accountability working party annual report for 1985. In NZASW Annual General Meeting Minutes Napier [meeting minutes].
Nash, M. (2004). Social work in Aotearoa New Zealand: Its origins and traditions. In M. Connolly (Ed.), New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice (pp 32-43). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
National Executive (1988). National Executive report. NZSW Review, 1(1), 32.
New Zealand Association of Social Workers (1988). Minutes of special general meeting NZASW Wellington 19th November 1988 [meeting minutes].
New Zealand Association of Social Workers (August, 1986). Minutes of the Annual General Meeting, 26 August 1986. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 7-8.
New Zealand Association of Social Workers (1993). Code of Ethics. Dunedin, New Zealand, Author.
New Zealand Association of Social Workers’ Conference
Committee (1985). Report to the National Executive. In NZASW National Executive minutes Wellington 7 December 1985 [meeting minutes].
New Zealand Association of Social Workers’ Working Party on Racism (February 1984). News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers].
New Zealand Social Workers Training Council (February, 1984). Report. News and Views [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 3-4.
O’Brien, M. (2014). The world we’re in: Social work now and then. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(2&3), 6-16.
Ohia, R. (June 1987). Report from the Tangata Whenua President. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 1.
Ohia, R. (1988a). Speech by Rahera Ohia on behalf of the Tangata Whenua Caucus. Social Work Review [Supplemental material] September 1988, 4.
Ohia, R. (1988b). Tangata Whenua Caucus report. NZSW Review, 1(1), 31-32.
Pihama, T. (1991). Tangata Whenua report. Social Work Review, 4(1), 26-27.
Ruwhiu, L. (1999). Ko tane pupuke. Social Work Review Te Komako III, 11, 32-37.
Ruwhiu, L. (2002). Te ripota o te kaiwhakahaere- Tangata Whenua Takawaenga o Aotearoa. Social Work Review Te Komako, XIV(2), 3-7.
Standing Committee on Racism (March, 1986). Draft principles and bi-cultural code of practice prepared for the Accountability Working Party. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association
of Social Workers], 8-9.
Standing Committee on Racism (July, 1986). A challenge to social workers. News and Views in Social Work. [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers], 5.
Tozer, G. (1984). President’s message. News and Views in Social Work [Newsletter of the New Zealand Association of Social Workers].
Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2002). Editorial. Social Work Review, Te Komako, XIV(2), 1-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.