Emancipatory social work: An anticapitalist perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol36iss4id1203Keywords:
emancipation, Marxism, Anti-oppressive practice and theory, anti-capitalismAbstract
The global definition of social work, as articulated by the International Federation of Social Workers, states that social work is a practice-based profession and an academic discipline that, amongst other things, promotes the empowerment and liberation of people. The knowledge base for social work has a rich history of different theoretical perspectives, frameworks and practice models that have attempted to highlight key aspects of human oppression, discrimination and marginalisation and tease out the implications for social work practice in these domains. These approaches have included anti-discriminatory practice, anti-oppressive practice, anti-racist practice, and feminist and empowerment perspectives. In the same tradition, this paper draws on the work of US analytical Marxist sociologist, Eric Olin Wright to consider how his concept of emancipatory social science could be harnessed by social work practitioners, researchers and policymakers to advance human emancipation and what this might mean in different practice domains. The article will focus primarily on a close reading of two of Olin Wright’s publications–Envisioning Real Utopias and How to Be an Anticapitalist in the 21st Century. The article argues for the value of emancipation over empowerment as a concept to convey an authentic commitment to human liberation. It also considers the implications of emancipatory social work for relationships with service users in the context of anti-capitalist struggle and discusses the ramifications for decolonising social work practice in a settler colonial state.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2019). Code of ethics. https://www.anzasw.nz/code-of-ethics/
Baines, D., & Clark, N. (2022). Anti-oppressive practice: Roots, theory, tensions. In D. Baines, N. Clark, & B. Bennett (Eds.), Doing anti-oppressive social work: Rethinking theory and practice (4th ed.). Fernwood Publishing.
Baines, D., Clark, N., & Bennett, B. (Eds.). (2022). Doing anti-oppressive social work: Rethinking theory and practice (4th ed.). Fernwood Publishing.
Baines, D., & Sauer, J. (2022). Bridging the practice-activism divide: Advocacy, organizing and social movements. In D. Baines, N. Clark, & B. Bennett (Eds.), Doing anti-oppressive social work: Rethinking theory and practice (4th ed.). Fernwood Publishing.
Ballantyne, N. (2022). Scholarly publication, open access and the commons. Critical and Radical Social Work, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021x16467538565525
Baumann, D. F. (2023). Thrivance is my identity: Moving beyond survival. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 10(4), 1–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48754823
Bhattacharya, T. (Ed.). (2017). Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto Press.
Boukli, A., & Kotzé, J. (Eds.). (2018). Zemiology: Reconnecting crime and social harm. Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76312-5
Brohan, E., Gauci, D., Sartorius, N., & Thornicroft, G. (2011). Self-stigma, empowerment and perceived discrimination among people with bipolar disorder or depression in 13 European countries: The GAMIAN–Europe study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 129(1), 56–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.001
Brown, C., & MacDonald, J. E. (Eds.) (with Baines, D.). (2020). Critical clinical social work: Counterstorying for social justice. Canadian Scholars.
Canning, V., & Tombs, S. (2021). From social harm to zemiology: A critical introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Polity Press.
Coughlan, T. (2024, July 10). Landlords set for early tax refunds under coalition deal tipped to cost $3b. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/landlords-set-for-early-tax-refunds-under-coalition-agreement-policy-cost-tipped-to-hit-3b/
DSJD5XJHHZHLDPNVCVUAIZGXYI/
De Courson, B., & Nettle, D. (2021). Why do inequality and deprivation produce high crime and low trust? Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80897-8
de Montigny, G. (2022). Which side are you on? Marxist praxis for social work. In S. S. Shaikh, B. A. Le François, & T. Macías (Eds.) Critical social work praxis. (pp.21-42) Fernwood Publishing. https://fernwoodpublishing.ca/book/critical-social-work-praxis
Dencik, L. (2018). Surveillance realism and the politics of imagination: Is there no alternative? Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1. https://archive.krisis.eu/surveillance-realism-and-the-politics-of-imagination-is-there-no-alternative/
Dencik, L. (2022). Data and capitalism. In L. Dencik, A. Hintz, J. Redden, & E. Treré (Eds.) Data justice. (pp.11-24) Sage Publications
Engler, M., & Engler, P. (2021, July 22). André Gorz’s non-reformist reforms show how we can transform the world today. Jacobin. https://jacobin.com/2021/07/andre-gorz-non-reformist-reforms-revolution-political-theory
Fraser, N. (1998). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation (WZB Discussion Paper). Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44061
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Maxwell Macmillan International.
Gair, S., Zuchowski, I., & Beddoe, L. (2020). Open access publishing: A key enabler to research impact, informed practice and social justice. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 22(2), 25–38.
Garrett, P. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about “Neoliberalism”? European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1530643
Garrett, P. M. (2022). Marxism and dissenting social work: A commentary. In S. S. Shaikh, B. A. Le François, & T. Macías (Eds.) , Critical social work praxis. Fernwood Publishing.
Gough, J. (2020). Why the Labour Party lost the British 2019 general election: Social democracy versus neoliberalism and the far right. Class, Race and Corporate Power, 8(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/48644421
Gray, M., & Webb, S. A. (2008). The myth of global social work: Double standards and the local-global divide. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 19(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428230802077988
Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation (pp. 76–78). Radical Feminism. https://repository.duke.edu/dc/wlmpc/wlmms01039
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Hunter, A. A., & Flores, G. (2021). Social determinants of health and child maltreatment: A systematic review. Pediatric Research, 89(2), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01175-x
International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work/
Ioakimidis, V. (2013). Beyond the dichotomies of cultural and political relativism: Arguing the case for a social justice based “global social work” definition. Critical and Radical Social Work, 1(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986013X673254
Jones, D. N. (2024). The global agenda for social work and social development: A conflicted global concept? Practice, 36(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2024.2323062
Kalsem, K., & Williams, V. L. (2010). Social justice feminism. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 18, 131–193.
Kawiti-Bishara, T. K. (2023, May 4). Te O ranganui starts “new journey” as premises officially opened. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/whanganui-chronicle/news/a-new-journey-begins-for-whanganui-iwi-led-health-and-social-service-provider/RVNTJDXCAVE77MVBXFVBUT62Z4/
Labour Party. (2017). Alternative models of ownership. Labour. https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Alternative-Models-of-Ownership.pdf
Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., & Ikeda, J. (2013). Neo-liberalism and responsibilisation in the discourse of social service workers. British Journal of Social Work, bct172. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct172
Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach by Karl Marx. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm
Masquelier, C. (2019, February 5). Envisioning real utopias from within the capitalist present – Erik Olin Wright remembered. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/envisioning-real-utopias-from-within-the-capitalist-present-erik-olin-wright-remembered-110646
McMullen, A., Taylor, A., & McFee, G. (2024, April 26). Worker co-operatives and social care. Care Together Program. Iwi social services
Monticelli, L. (Ed.). (2022). The future is now: An introduction to prefigurative politics. Bristol University Press.
Murali, V., & Oyebode, F. (2004). Poverty, social inequality and mental health. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.10.3.216
Neilson, M. (2023, September 9). Māori Party to abolish prisons by 2040, establish separate tikanga justice system. NZ Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/election-2023-maori-party-want-to-abolish-prisons-by-2040-separate-tikanga-justice-system-to-address-inequities/2OEWB6NBPVCG3GY56HIJ4VRYWQ/
New Socialist. (2017, June 6). Labour’s alternative models of ownership report. New Socialist. https://newsocialist.org.uk/labours-alternative-models-of-ownership-report/
Parkinson, A., Keddell, E., & Walker, P. (2021). Exploring peer support as a strategy to reduce self-stigma for marginalised children of parents with mental illness (COPMI). British Journal of Social Work, 51(3), 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa161
Pike, J., & Vickers, T. (2022). Marxist theory for social work. In S. S. Shaikh, B. A. Le François, & T. Macías (Eds.) Critical social work praxis, (pp.13-18). Fernwood Publishing.
Radio New Zealand. (2023, June 11). Green Party announces “Income Guarantee” plan to help households meet rising costs. RNZ. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/491772/green-party-announces-income-guarantee-plan-to-help-households-meet-rising-costs
Ricoeur, P. (with Taylor, G. H.). (1986). Lectures on ideology and utopia. Columbia University Press.
Rivest, M.-P., & Moreau, N. (2015). Between emancipatory practice and disciplinary interventions: Empowerment and contemporary social normativity. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1855–1870. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43687954
RNZ (Director). (2023, December 21). Government passes legislation to fully reinstate 90-day trials [Broadcast]. In RNZ. Radio New Zealand. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/505252/government-passes-legislation-to-fully-reinstate-90-day-trials
Rogowski, S. (2012). Social work with children and families: Challenges and possibilities in the neo-liberal world. The British Journal of Social Work, 42(5), 921–940. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43771702
Romeo, N. (2022, August 27). How Mondragon became the world’s largest co-op. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/how-mondragon-became-the-worlds-largest-co-op
Rozoworski, M. (2017, April 6). Democratize this. Jacobin. https://jacobin.com/2017/06/labour-corbyn-general-election-nationalization
Shaikh, S. S., Le François, B. A., & Macías, T. (Eds.). (2022). Critical social work praxis. Fernwood Publishing.
Smale, A. (2024, January 20). Māori rise up while government looks to rewrite history. Newsroom. http://newsroom.co.nz/2024/01/21/maori-rise-up-while-government-hides/
Sowman-Lund, S. (2024, April 18). An updated tally of the public sector job cuts. The Spinoff. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/18-04-2024/a-running-tally-of-the-public-sector-job-cuts
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpgvt
Taylor, K. B. (Ed.). (2017). How we get free: Black feminism and the Combahee River Collective. Haymarket Books.
Te Whatu Ora. (2024). Social determinants of health in Aotearoa. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/for-health-professionals/clinical-guidance/specific-life-stage-health-information/child-health/well-child-tamariki-programme/te-mahau-tarearea-o-tamariki-ora/social-determinants-of-health-in-aotearoa/
Tew, J. (2006). Understanding power and powerlessness: Towards a framework for emancipatory practice in social work. Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017306062222
The Spinoff. (2024, January 25). Gone by lunchtime: Three-headed taniwha. The Spinoff. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/25-01-2024/gone-by-lunchtime-three-headed-taniwha
The Young Foundation. (2017). Humanity at work: Mondragon, a social innovation ecosystem case study. The Young Foundation. https://socialinnovationexchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Humanity-at-Work-online-copy.pdf
Webb, D. (2019). A socialist compass for Aotearoa: Envisioning Māori socialism. Counterfutures, 8, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.26686/cf.v8i0.6362
Whiteley, P., Poletti, M., Webb, P., & Bale, T. (2019). Oh Jeremy Corbyn! Why did Labour Party membership soar after the 2015 general election? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118815408
Wilkinson, R., & Picket, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Penguin.
World Health Organisation. (2024). Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health
Wright, E. (2012). Reply to comments on Envisioning Real Utopias. New Political Science, 34(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.703861
Wright, E. O. (2006). Compass points. New Left Review, 41, 93–124.
Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2019). How to be an anticapitalist in the twenty-first century. Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2023). Classes. Verso.
Young, I. M. (2022). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.