Being Pono: Ethical dilemmas as learning tools for student social workers
Social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand are bound by codes of practice and ethics, including the three Maori values of tika, pono and aroha. Ethical dilemmas occur frequently in practice situations for social workers. Student social workers on practicum may have to face these issues not only in regard to work with service users, but also in the behaviour and actions of the social workers and staff in the agency in which they are placed. Given the evidence regarding the disjuncture of learning transfer between theoretical and practical settings, this article argues that ethics and whistle-blowing issues faced by social work students are beneficial experiences in terms of translating theory and belief into practice.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (2013). Code of ethics. Christchurch, New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from http://anzasw.nz/wp-content/uploads/Code-of-Ethics.pdf
Barsky, A. E. (2009). Ethics and values in social work: An integrated approach for a comprehensive curriculum. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barton, H., Bell, K., & Bowles, W. (2005). Help or hindrance? Outcomes of social work student placements. Australian Social Work, 58(3), 301-312.
Campbell, C., Scott-Lincourt, R., & Brennan, K. (2008). The real world of the ivory tower: Linking classroom and practice via pedagogical modeling. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 28(1-2), 35-51.
Davidson, J. C. (2005). Professional relationship boundaries: A social work teaching module. Social Work Education, 24(5), 511-533.
Delaney, P. E. (2007). The dichotomy of theory and practice: Ethical reflections of a third-year student’s placement experience. Ethics and Social Welfare, 1(1), 108-110.
Dickens, J. (2012). Social work, law and ethics. New York: Routledge.
Lafrance, J., & Gray, E. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23(3), 325-340.
Lemieux, C. M., & Allen, P. D. (2007). Service learning in social work education: The state of knowledge, pedagogical practicalities, and practice conundrums. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 309-326.
Mansbach, A., & Bachner, Y. G. (2009). Self-reported likelihood of whistleblowing by social work students. Social Work Education, 28(1), 18-28.
Preston-Shoot, M. (2011). On administrative evil-doing within social work policy and services: law, ethics and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 177-194.
Rodie, S. (2008). Whistleblowing by students in practice learning settings: The student perspective. Ethics and Social Welfare, 2(1), 95-99.
Rossiter, A. B. (1995). Teaching social work skills from a critical perspective. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne de service social, 9-27.
Smith, E. R., Mackie, D. M., & Claypool, H. M. (2014). Social psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Social Workers Registration Board (2016). Code of
conduct for social workers. Retrieved from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/complaints/code-of-conduct
Tam, D. M. Y. (2003). Gatekeeping in bachelor of social work field education. Women in Welfare Education, 6, 51-63.
Young, S., McKenzie, M., Omre, C., Schjelderup, L., & Walker, S. (2014). Practicing from theory: Thinking and knowing to “Do” child protection work. Social Sciences, 3(4), 893-915.
Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. Q. (2009). On whistleblowing judgment and intention: The roles of positive mood and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(7), 627-649.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.