Social work with older people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: Using research to inform practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol23iss3id156Keywords:
culturally and linguistically diverse people, older people, caregivers, ageism, health, social work practice,Abstract
This research investigated the views of older culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) people, their families and paid workers about experiences of giving and receiving care services in the Barwon region of Victoria, Australia. The project was conducted in collaboration with Diversitat, Geelong. While the research process incorporated a range of qualitative techniques this article is confined to reporting selected findings from the individual interviews and a focus group discussion. These findings demonstrated that particular caregiver personal attributes strengthened the relationship between older people and caregivers; differing interpretations were offered up about the use of time; multiple barriers for older CALD people using health and social services were identified; and that experiences of ageism within the health services were reported along with infrequent use of interpreter services. The article concludes with a discussion about the implications for social work practice and education with older CALD people.
References
Boston, J., & Davey, J. Eds. (2006). The implications of population ageing: Opportunities and risks. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University.
Butler, R. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. Gerontologist, 9, 243-245.
Coory, M. (2004). Ageing and healthcare costs in Australia: A case for policy based evidence? Medical Journal of Australia, 180, 581-583.
D’Cruz, H. (2007). Working with ‘diverse bodies, diverse identities’: An approach to professional education about ‘diversity’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(1), 35-57.
Dean, R. (2001). The myth of cross-cultural practice. Families in Society, 82(6), 623-630.
Furness, S. (2005). Shifting sands: Developing cultural competence. Social Work, 17(4), 247-256.
Ganguly, I. (2001). The Third Dimension: Cultural awareness for non-English speaking background professionals. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(2), 109-110.
Gannon, J. (2000). Working across cultures: Applications and exercises. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Geelong Ethnic Community Council. (2004). Aged care for CALD clients. A report into the needs of people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds across Geelong and the Barwon Region. Geelong, Victoria.
Hogan-Garcia, M. (2003). The four skills of cultural diversity competence, 2nd Ed. California: Thomson/Brooks Cole.
Home and Community Care (HACC) Program. (2003). Barwon-South Western Regional Plan, 2003-2006. Accessed June 2004 from http://www.health.vic.gov.au/hacc/.
Jong Won Min. (2005). Cultural competency: A key to effective future social work with racially and ethnically diverse elders. Families in Society, 86(3), 347-358.
Kagawa-Singer, M., & Blackhall, L. (2002). Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: “You got to go where he lives”. The Journal of American Medical Association, 286(23), 2993-3002.
Kite, M., & Wagner, L. (2002). Attitudes toward older adults. In T. Nelson (Ed), Ageism. Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. London: Dradford Book.
McDonagh, M. (2000). Cross-cultural communication and pharmaceutical care. Drugs Topics, 144(18), 95-105. Matsumoto, D. & Juang, L. (2004). Culture and psychology, 3rd Ed. Southbank: Thomson.
Mullings, & Schulz. (2006). Intersectionality and health: An introduction. In A. Schulz & L. Mullings (Eds). Gender, race, class, and health: Intersectional approaches. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Ngo-metzger, Q., Massangli, M., Clarridge, B., Manocchia, M., Davis, R., Iezzoni, L., & Phillips, R. (2003). Linguistic and cultural barriers to care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 44-52.
Nipress, S. (2001). A community approach to living in harmony. Western Australia: Northern Suburbs CALD Resource Centre.
O’Connell, B. & Ostaszkiewicz, J. (2005). Sink or swim – ageing in Australia. Australian Health Review, 29(2), 146–150.
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism. Cultural diversity and political theory. London: Macmillan Press.
Robb, C., Chen, H., & Haley, W. (2002). Ageism in mental health and health care: A critical review. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 8(1), 1-12.
Samovar, L. & Porter, R. (2003). Understanding intercultural communication: An introduction and overview in intercultural communication. A reader. 10th Ed. Australia: Thomson, Wadsworth, pp. 6-17.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Teese, C. (2002, June, 1st). Budget ignores an ageing Australia. News Weekly, 14-15.
Triandis, H. (2003). Culture and conflict. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.). Intercultural communication. A reader, 10th Ed. Belmont: Thomson, Wadsworth, pp. 18–28.
Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: Economist Books.
Weaver, H. (1999). Indigenous people and the social work profession: Defining culturally competent services. Social Work, 44(3), 217-225.
Wells, Y., Foreman, P., Gething, L., & Petralia, W. (2004). Nurses attitudes toward aging and older adults: Examining attitudes and practices among health services providers in Australia. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(9), 5-15.
Williams, C. (2006). Training for cultural competence: Individual and group processes. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 14(1/2), 111-143.
Yeatman, A. (1995). Interlocking oppressions. In B. Caine & R. Pringle (Eds). Transitions: New Australian feminisms. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, pp. 42-56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.