Incorporating community development into social work practice within the neoliberal environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol23iss3id159Keywords:
social work education, community development, neoliberalism,Abstract
Community development is a core subject in social work education, yet social work discourse often places community development at its margins (Mendes, 2009). This article considers the location of community development and community work within the current neoliberal environment in New Zealand and how such practice can be sustained by social workers in the community and voluntary sector.
Community development is a way of working with communities that has a ‘bottom up’ approach as an alternative to State (top down) development. Over recent years, however, successive New Zealand governments have embraced neoliberal social policies that have marginalised community development. In addition the term ‘community work’ has been used to describe activities that have little to do with a bottom up approach thereby making it difficult to define both community development and community work. By applying a ‘knowledge intersections’ schema to two New Zealand community and voluntary organi- sations we identify where community development and social work intersect. From this basis we challenge social workers to consider ways in which community development can be embedded within their practice.
References
Aimers, J. (2005). Developing community partnerships: Social wellbeing and the Local Government Act 2002. Social Work Review, 17(3), 34-40.
Aimers, J. (2011 in press). The impact of NZ third way style government on women in community development. Community Development Journal, Special Issue ‘The Politics of Everyday Life: Feminisms and Contemporary Community Development, Summer.
Aimers, J., & Walker, P. (2008). Is community accountability a casualty of government partnering in New Zealand? Social Work Review, 20(3), 14-24.
Aimers, J., & Walker, P. (2009a). Community development as ‘knowledge intersections’ in contemporary New Zealand. Community Development Journal International Symposium, September.
Aimers, J., & Walker, P. (2009b). Structures and strategies revisited 2008: A comparative storying of five social service and community support organisations in Otago, New Zealand. Monograph, University of Otago. 69 pages. http://www.communityresearch.org.nz/resources.php?view=1173.
Bamford, T. (1990). The future of social work. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Beddoe, L., & Maidment, J. (2009). Mapping knowledge for social work practice, critical intersections. Australia: Cengage Learning.
Community Employment Group. (2002). Evaluation of the Community Employment Group’s Community Employment Initiatives. Unpublished report.
Department of Internal Affairs. (2006). The Community Development Resource Kit. Retrieved 4 May 2009 from www.community.net.nz/how-toguides/crk.
Department of Internal Affairs. (2008). Ministerial briefing papers. Retrieved 1 May 2009 from http://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/all/files/DIA_BIM.pdf.
DeFilippis, J., Fisher, R., & Shragge, E. (2009). What’s left in the community? Oppositional politics in contemporary practice. Community Development Journal, 44(1), 38-52.
Eketone, A. (2006). Tapuwae: A vehicle for community change. Community Development Journal, 41(4), 467-480.
Grey, S. (2009). Women, politics and protest: Rethinking women’s liberation activisim in New Zealand. In K. McMillan, J. Leslie & E. McLeay (Eds.). Rethinking women and politics: New Zealand and comparative perspectives (pp. 34-61). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Healy, T. (2004). Social capital: Some policy and research implications for New Zealand. Research Paper, Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University, Wellington. Retrieved 16 May 2009 from http://ips.ac.nz/events/downloads/Tom%20Healy%20social%20capital%20report%20IPS%202004.pdf.
Healey, P., de Magalhaes, C., Kadanipour, A., & Pendlebury, J.. (2003). Place, identity and local politics: Analysing initiatives in deliberative governance. Deliberative policy analysis (pp. 60-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, K. (2005). No way out? Incorporating and restructuring the voluntary sector within spaces of neo-liberalism. In N. Laurie and L. Bondi (Eds). Working the spaces of neo-liberalism (pp. 216-221). Blackwell Publishing.
Kenny, S. (2011). Developing communities for the future (4th ed.) Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.
Larner, W., & Butler, M. (2005). Governmentalities of local partnerships: The rise of a ‘partnering state’ in New Zealand. Antipode, 37(3).
Larner, W., & Craig, D. (2005). After neo-liberalism? Community activism and local partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode, 37(3), 402-424.
Local Government New Zealand. (2008). Role of local government. Retrieved 4 May 2009 from http://www.lgnz.co.nz/lg-sector/role.
Mendes, P. (2009). Teaching community development to social work students: A critical reflection. Community Development Journal, 44(2), 248-262.
Ministry of Social Development. (2008). New funding for NGO sector as part of Pathway to Partnership. Retrieved 20 February 2008 from http://www.msd.govt.nz/media-information/press-releases/2008/pr-2008-02-12.html.
Office of the Community and Voluntary Sector (OCVS). (2010). Retrieved November 2010 from www.ocvs.govt.nz.
Opie, A. (2000). Thinking teams/thinking clients: Knowledge-based teamwork. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shannon, P., & Walker, P. (2009). Partnerships and control: Lessons from a research programme into strategies for deliberative governance. Community Development Journal Symposium, London.
Shaw, F. (2006). Community development and the politics of community. Community Development Journal, 43(1), 24-36.
Sihlongonyane, M. F. (2009). Community development as a buzz-word. Development in Practice, 19(2), 136-147.
Tennant, M., O’Brien, M., & Sanders, J. (2008). The history of the non-profit sector in New Zealand, Office for the Community and Voluntary Sector. Retrieved 12 May 2009 from http://www.ocvs.govt.nz/documents/publications/reports/the-history-of-the-non-profit-sector-in-new-zealand.pdf.
Thornton, G. (2011). New Zealand not for profit survey 2010/11. Retrieved 20 April 2011 from http://www.grant-thornton.co.nz/Assets/documents/home/NFP-report-2011-2012.pdf.
Vanderpyl, J. (2004). Aspiring for unity and equality: Dynamics of conflict and change in the ‘by women for women’ feminist service groups, Aotearoa/New Zealand (1970-1999). unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland.
Walker, P. (2007). Trust, risk and control in an indigenous-non-indigenous social service partnership. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(3), 281-290.
Walker, R. (1990). Ka whawhai tonu matou: Struggle without end. Auckland: Penguin Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
