‘Is a funeral a right?‘ Exploring indigent funerals from social work perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol27iss1-2id18Abstract
Research shows that funerals take place in a tension between the desire for a meaningful event and the reality of cost. Every culture has traditions for marking life‘s end and this must include responses to people who die indigent (without resources). This study takes place in the context of current welfare debates and the growing aging population which will require increasing numbers of people to organise and fund funerals. Yet funeral poverty and funeral welfare policy are an under-researched element of the welfare debate. In Aotearoa New Zealand some assistance with costs is available from the Government through Work and Income New Zealand or the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). However, grants are not designed to meet the full cost of a funeral. It is expected that family and/or friends will meet the remaining costs, but there are times when there is no one able or willing to do this. This exploratory study interviewed four professionals (two social workers, one community worker and a funeral director) who had taken responsibility for arranging an indigent funeral, in order to explore their motivations and experiences. Findings from the participants revealed that the level of current government support is inadequate; however, they also suggested that communities may need to take more responsibility for funerals, particularly for vulnerable population groups. Social workers can play a role both by initiat- ing conversations about funerals with clients and advocating for enhanced access to funeral services and grants to prevent the increase of funeral poverty
References
Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). (2011). Increases to ACC Client Payments. Retrieved from http://www. acc.co.nz/news/WPC094813.
Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). (2013). Funeral Grants. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Altilio, T., & Otis-Green, S. (2011). Oxford textbook of palliative social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Banks, D.A. (1998). The economics of death? A descriptive study of the impact of funeral and cremation costs on U.S. households. Death Studies, 22, 269-285.
Bechelet, L., Heal, R., Leam, C., & Payne, M. (2008). Empowering carers to reconstruct their finances. Practice: Social Work in Action, 20(4), 223-234.
Bern-Klug, M. (2004). The decision labyrinth: Helping families find their way through funeral options. Funerals and Memorial Practices, (Summer), 31-36.
Bern-Klug, M., Ekerdt, D.J. & Wilkinson, D.S. (1999). What families know about funeral related costs: Implications for social work practice. Health and Social Work, 24(2), 128-137.
Bradbury, M. (1999). Representations of death: A social psychological perspective. London: Routledge.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Burial and Cremation Act, No. 75. (1964). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1964/0075/ latest/DLM355079.html#DLM1806648
Castex, G.M. (2007). Social workers‘ final act of service: Respectful burial arrangements for indigent, unclaimed, and unidentified people. Social Work, 52(4), 331-339.
Christchurch earthquake: Latest news – Wednesday. (2011, 2 March). Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/ christchurch-earthquake/4721042/Christchurch-earthquake-Latest-news-Wednesday
Corden, A., & Hirst, M. (2013). Economic components of grief. Death Studies, 37, 725–749.
Corden, A., Hirst, M., & Nice, K. (2010). Death of a partner: Financial implications and experience of loss. Bereave- ment Care, 29(1), 23-28.
Corden, A., Sainsbury, R., & Sloper, P. (2004). Money matters and bereavement support. Bereavement Care, 23(2), 19-21.
Corden, A., Sloper, P., & Sainsbury, R. (2002). Financial effects for families after the death of a disabled or chronically ill child: A neglected dimension of bereavement. Child: Care, Health & Development, 28(3), 199-204.
Corr, C.A., & Corr, D.M. (2013). Death and dying, life and living (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Crouch, M. (2004). Last matters: The latent meanings of contemporary funeral rites. In A. Fagen (Ed.). Making sense of dying and death. New York, NY: Rodopi, 125-140.
Drakeford, M. (1998). Last rights? Funerals, poverty and social exclusion. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 507-524.
Dwyer, P. (2010). Understanding social citizenship: Themes and perspectives for policy and practice (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fan, J.X., & Zick, C.D. (2004). The economic burden of health care, funeral, and burial expenditures at the end of life. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(1), 35-55.
Forrester-Jones, R. (2013). The road barely taken: Funerals, and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 243-256.
Fox, M. (2005). To die destitute today: What are the implications for social work? Australian Social Work, 58(2), 188-198. Francis, C. (2011, 14 September). Funeral for a forgotten man. The Dominion Post. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/5619143/Funeral-for-a-forgotten-man
Green, J.W. (2008). Beyond the good death: The anthropology of modern dying. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hera, J. (1995). Reclaiming the last rites (rights): Women and after-death policy, practices and beliefs in Aotearoa/New Zealand (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Palmerston North, NZ: Massey University.
Howarth, G. (2007). Death and dying: A sociological introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Ife, J. (2012). Human rights and social work: Towards rights-based practice (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Kastenbaum, R. (2004). Why funerals? Generations, pp. 5-10.
Kaufman, S.R. & Morgan, L.M. (2005). The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 317-341.
Kellehear, A. (2012). Dying in the UK? Politics, ideologies, and futures. In A. Pankratz, C-U. Viol & A. de Waal, Birth and death in British culture: Liminality, power, and performance pp. 83-96. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Law Commission. (2013). The legal framework for burial and cremation in New Zealand: A first principles review (Issues Paper 34). Wellington, NZ: author.
Leming, M.R., & Dickenson, G.E. (2011). Understanding dying, death, and bereavement (7th Ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Maclean, V.M. & Williams, J.E. (2003). The history of the American cemetery and some reflections on the meaning of death. In C.D. Bryant (Ed.). Handbook of death and dying, pp. 743-756. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McManus, R., & Du Plessis, R. (2012). Death and dying – Funeral and memorial services. In Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/death-and-dying/page-3
McManus, R., & Schäfer, C. (2009). Final arrangements: Attitudes to funeral costs in New Zealand. Christchurch, NZ: BRCSS Research Report.
Mitford, J. (1963). The American way of death. London: Hutchinson. Mitford, J. (1999). The American way of death revisited. London: Virago.
Ngata, P. (2005). Death, dying, and grief: A Maori perspective. In J.D. Morgan & P. Laungani (Eds.), Death and bereavement around the world, Volume 4: Death and bereavement in Asia, Australia and New Zealand. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
Oliviere, D., Monroe, B., & Payne, S. (Eds.) (2010). Death, dying, and social differences (2nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies: Reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3-20.
Pine, V.R., & Phillips, D.L. (1970). The cost of dying: A sociological analysis of funeral expenditures. Social Problems, 17(3), 405-417.
Raudon, S. (2011). Contemporary funerals and mourning practices: An investigation of five secular countries. Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Fellowship Report. Retrieved from http://www.communitymatters.govt.nz/ Funding-and-grants---Trust-and-fellowship-grants---New-Zealand-Winston-Churchill-Memorial-Trust---Research-reports#2011
Salomene, J. J. (2003). The evolution of the funeral home and the occupation of funeral director. In C.D. Bryant (Ed.). Handbook of death and dying, pp. 575-586. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schäfer, C. (2007). Post-mortem personalization: Pastoral power and the New Zealand funeral director. Mortality, 12(1), 4-21.
Schäfer, C. (2012). Corpses, conflict and insignificance? A critical analysis of post-mortem practices. Mortality: Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying, 17(4), 305-321.
Schram, S., & Silverman, B. (2012). The end of social work: Neoliberalizing social policy implementation. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), 128-145.
Sheppard, M. (2004). Appraising and using social research in the human services: An introduction for social work and health professionals. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Song, J., Bartels, D.M., Ratner, E.R., Alderton, L., Hudson, B., & Ahluwalia, J.S. (2007). Dying on the streets: Homeless persons‘ concerns and desires about end of life care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 435-441.
Song, J., Ratner, E.R., Bartels, D.M., Alderton, L., Hudson, B., & Ahluwalia, J.S. (2007). Experiences with and attitudes toward death and dying among homeless persons. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 427-434.
Song, J., Wall, M.M., Ratner, E.R., Bartels, D.M., Ulvestad, N., & Gelberg, L. (2008). Engaging homeless persons in end of life preparations. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(12), 2031-2045.
Speer, S., Hunt, T., & Ensor, B. (2012, 17 January). Morgan to pay for Blanket Man‘s funeral. The Dominion Post. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/6267246/Morgan-to-pay-for-Blanket-Mans-funeral.
Strange, J.M. (2005). Death, grief and poverty in Britain, 1870-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tarzian, A.J., Neal, M.T., & O‘Neil, J.A. (2005). Attitudes, experiences, and beliefs affecting end-of-life decision-mak-
ing among homeless individuals. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(1), 36-48.
The Dominion Post. (2011, 13 September). No family at funeral for long-dead pensioner. Retrieved from http://www. stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/5615142/No-family-at-funeral-for-long-dead-pensioner.
Valentine, C., & Woodthorpe, K. (2013 – early online). From the cradle to the grave: Funeral welfare from an inter- national perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 0(0), 1-22.
Wallace, J., & Pease, B. (2011). Neoliberalism and Australian social work: Accommodation or resistance? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 132-142.
Woodthorpe, K., Rumble, H., & Valentine, C. (2013). Putting ‘the grave‘ into social policy: State support for funerals in contemporary UK society. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 605-622.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
