Working with ‘risk’: It’s more than just an assessment idea

Authors

  • Tony Stanley Has worked in frontline child welfare social work and academic teaching in New Zealand, Australia and the UK for the past 15 years. A visiting lecturer at Westminster University and part of the senior management team at Tower Hamlets Children’s Social Care.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol22iss2id198

Keywords:

risk, social work practice, families,

Abstract

Social work practice invariably means attention to ‘risk’ and its multiple and at times contested meanings. This article reports on a series of workshops, held in New Zealand and London, with social workers and their supervisors, where we considered how the language of risk acts as a powerful influence in and through our practice. A central idea in each work-shop is that there is much to be gained in learning from families about what they define as risky and how they manage risks in their lives. A more ‘family led’ way of learning about risk from the families themselves can teach us a great deal about what they see as risky, what they define as ‘high risk’ and what risks they may need to manage that could adversely affect their children or vulnerable family members. There is applicability here for all areas of social work because risk is now so embedded in contemporary practice. The message here is that a critical engagement with discourses of risk will assist us work toward risk management that should be an empowering practice for society’s most vulnerable. Considered in this way ‘risk’ is certainly more than just an assessment idea. 

References

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in the ‘risk society’ British Journal of Social Work Advance Access, February 22, 2010.

Connolly, M., & Doolan, M. (2007). Lives cut short: Child death by maltreatment. Wellington, New Zealand: Dunmore Publishing.

Field, J. (2008). Rethinking supervision and shaping future practice. Social Work Now, 40, 11-18.

Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, social policy and welfare. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.

Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5-27.

Social Work Task Force (SWTF). (2009). Building a safe, confident future – The final report of the Social Work Task Force Department of Children, Schools and Families.

Stanley, T. (2005). Making decisions: Social work processes and the construction of risk(s) in child protection work. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.

Stanley, T. (2007). Risky work: Child protection practice. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand: Te Puna Whakaaro, 30, 163-177.

Stanley, T., & Kelly, S. (2010). Weaving sociology into New Zealand social work education. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 1470-1227, First published on 20 January 2010.

Titterton, M. (2005). Risk and risk taking in health and social welfare. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Webb, S. (2006). Social work in a risk society: Social and political perspectives. Houndsmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-01

How to Cite

Stanley, T. (2010). Working with ‘risk’: It’s more than just an assessment idea. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 22(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol22iss2id198

Issue

Section

Articles