Finally accountable? Social Work and the Community Investment Strategy

Authors

  • Lynda Sawyers Community Development Social Worker, Christchurch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id222

Keywords:

Community Investment Strategy, critical intersections, service user perspectives, social justice

Abstract

This article examines and proposes a social work response to the Ministry of Social Development’s Community Investment Strategy social policy. Beddoe and Maidment’s (2009) critical intersections model is utilised for this purpose and critical reference is made to the Productivity Commission’s (2015) policy-framing report More Effective Social Services. The details of the Community Investment Strategy are discussed in relation to service user perspectives, critical social theory, social justice and the role of the social work profession. The resulting analysis highlights that, if left unchecked, the Community Investment Strategy may do harm to those it purports to help. In particular, the Strategy promotes the Ministry of Social Development’s agenda at the expense of those who need to access social services. The suggested social work response is actively anti-oppressive in promoting social justice and placing the service user at the centre of social work practice.

References

Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2013). Code of Ethics. Christchurch, New Zealand: Author.

Banks, S. (2012). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work 16(5), 587-604. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.732931.

Beddoe, L., & Maidment, J. (2009). Mapping knowledge for social work practice: Critical intersections. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Cengage Learning.

Allan, J. (2009). Theorising new developments in critical social work. In J. Allan, L. Briskman, & B.Pease, (Eds.), Critical social work: theories and practices for a socially just world. NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Chu, W.C.K., Tsui, M., & Yan, M. (2009). Social work as a moral and political practice. International Social Work 52(3), 287-298. doi:10.1177/0020872808102064

Cooper, L., & Rigney, D. (2009). Preparing for practice. In J. Maidment, & R. Egan, (Eds.), Practice skills in social work and welfare: More than just common sense. NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave

MacMillan.

Duncan, G., & Worrall, J. (2000). Window on the world. Social policy and social work in New Zealand. European Journal of Social Work 3(3), 283-295. doi:10.1080/714052831

Egan, R., & Lewis-Nicholson, A. (2009). Anti-oppressive and strengths-based practice. In J. Maidment, & R. Egan, (Eds.), Practice skills in social work and welfare: More than just common sense (2nd Edition). NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

Furedi, F. (2007, 4 April). The only thing we have to fear is the 'culture of fear' itself: How human thought and action are being stifled by a regime of uncertainty. Retrieved from: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/3053#.Ve0J500w-Ag

Friedman, M. (2005). Trying hard is not good enough. How to produce measurable improvements for customers and communities. Victoria, BC, Canada: Trafford Publishing.

Green, D. (2007). Risk and social work practice. Australian Social Work 60(4), 395-409. doi:10.1080/03124070701671131

Houlbrook, M. (2011). Critical perspectives on results-based accountability: Practice tensions in small communitybased organisations. Third Sector Review 17(2), 45-68.

Keevers, L., Treleaven, L., Sykes, C., & Darcy, M. (2012). Made to measure: Taming practices with results-based accountability. Organization Studies 33(1), 97-120. doi:10.1177/017084611430597.

Ministry of Social Development (MSD). (2015a). Investing in services for outcomes. Community investment strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msdand-

our-work/work-programmes/community-investmentstrategy/community-investment-strategy.pdf

Ministry of Social Development (MSD). (2015b). Community Investment Trials. Wellington, New Zealand: Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/community-investment-strategy/community-investmenttrials-update-june-2015.pdf

New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2015a). Cut to the chase: More effective social services. August 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiry-content/2032?stage=4

New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2015b). More effective social services: Summary version. Retrieved from: http://www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiry-content/2032?stage=4

O’Brien, M. (2013). Welfare reform in Aotearoa/New Zealand: From citizen to managed worker. Social Policy and Administration 47(6), 279-748. doi:10.1111/spol.12040

Price, Waterhouse Coopers. (2014). Draft community investment strategy: Independent review. Retrieved from: https://222.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/community-investment-strategy/cis-independent-reviewpwc-report-december-2014.pdf.

Thompson, N. (2012). Anti-discriminatory practice. Equality, diversity and social justice (5th Edition). Basingstoke,

Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tolley, A. (2015). Investing in services for outcomes: Community investment strategy - completion and sector engagement. Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-andour-work/work-programmes/community-investmentstrategy/cis-cab-paper-completion-and-sectorengagement.pdf

Downloads

Published

2016-08-18

How to Cite

Sawyers, L. (2016). Finally accountable? Social Work and the Community Investment Strategy. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id222

Issue

Section

Original Articles