Finally accountable? Social Work and the Community Investment Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id222Keywords:
Community Investment Strategy, critical intersections, service user perspectives, social justiceAbstract
This article examines and proposes a social work response to the Ministry of Social Development’s Community Investment Strategy social policy. Beddoe and Maidment’s (2009) critical intersections model is utilised for this purpose and critical reference is made to the Productivity Commission’s (2015) policy-framing report More Effective Social Services. The details of the Community Investment Strategy are discussed in relation to service user perspectives, critical social theory, social justice and the role of the social work profession. The resulting analysis highlights that, if left unchecked, the Community Investment Strategy may do harm to those it purports to help. In particular, the Strategy promotes the Ministry of Social Development’s agenda at the expense of those who need to access social services. The suggested social work response is actively anti-oppressive in promoting social justice and placing the service user at the centre of social work practice.References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2013). Code of Ethics. Christchurch, New Zealand: Author.
Banks, S. (2012). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work 16(5), 587-604. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.732931.
Beddoe, L., & Maidment, J. (2009). Mapping knowledge for social work practice: Critical intersections. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Cengage Learning.
Allan, J. (2009). Theorising new developments in critical social work. In J. Allan, L. Briskman, & B.Pease, (Eds.), Critical social work: theories and practices for a socially just world. NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Chu, W.C.K., Tsui, M., & Yan, M. (2009). Social work as a moral and political practice. International Social Work 52(3), 287-298. doi:10.1177/0020872808102064
Cooper, L., & Rigney, D. (2009). Preparing for practice. In J. Maidment, & R. Egan, (Eds.), Practice skills in social work and welfare: More than just common sense. NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave
MacMillan.
Duncan, G., & Worrall, J. (2000). Window on the world. Social policy and social work in New Zealand. European Journal of Social Work 3(3), 283-295. doi:10.1080/714052831
Egan, R., & Lewis-Nicholson, A. (2009). Anti-oppressive and strengths-based practice. In J. Maidment, & R. Egan, (Eds.), Practice skills in social work and welfare: More than just common sense (2nd Edition). NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Furedi, F. (2007, 4 April). The only thing we have to fear is the 'culture of fear' itself: How human thought and action are being stifled by a regime of uncertainty. Retrieved from: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/3053#.Ve0J500w-Ag
Friedman, M. (2005). Trying hard is not good enough. How to produce measurable improvements for customers and communities. Victoria, BC, Canada: Trafford Publishing.
Green, D. (2007). Risk and social work practice. Australian Social Work 60(4), 395-409. doi:10.1080/03124070701671131
Houlbrook, M. (2011). Critical perspectives on results-based accountability: Practice tensions in small communitybased organisations. Third Sector Review 17(2), 45-68.
Keevers, L., Treleaven, L., Sykes, C., & Darcy, M. (2012). Made to measure: Taming practices with results-based accountability. Organization Studies 33(1), 97-120. doi:10.1177/017084611430597.
Ministry of Social Development (MSD). (2015a). Investing in services for outcomes. Community investment strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msdand-
our-work/work-programmes/community-investmentstrategy/community-investment-strategy.pdf
Ministry of Social Development (MSD). (2015b). Community Investment Trials. Wellington, New Zealand: Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/community-investment-strategy/community-investmenttrials-update-june-2015.pdf
New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2015a). Cut to the chase: More effective social services. August 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiry-content/2032?stage=4
New Zealand Productivity Commission. (2015b). More effective social services: Summary version. Retrieved from: http://www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiry-content/2032?stage=4
O’Brien, M. (2013). Welfare reform in Aotearoa/New Zealand: From citizen to managed worker. Social Policy and Administration 47(6), 279-748. doi:10.1111/spol.12040
Price, Waterhouse Coopers. (2014). Draft community investment strategy: Independent review. Retrieved from: https://222.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/community-investment-strategy/cis-independent-reviewpwc-report-december-2014.pdf.
Thompson, N. (2012). Anti-discriminatory practice. Equality, diversity and social justice (5th Edition). Basingstoke,
Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tolley, A. (2015). Investing in services for outcomes: Community investment strategy - completion and sector engagement. Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-andour-work/work-programmes/community-investmentstrategy/cis-cab-paper-completion-and-sectorengagement.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
