Making a claim for services: Supporting young people’s engagement with services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id233Keywords:
Young people, adversity, services, support, agency.Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Young people who experience significant adversity use multiple services (child welfare, youth justice, mental health, and education support services). Engagement with services can facilitate access to support and resources to mitigate the risks these young people face in their every-day lives. This article draws on the findings from a qualitative study which sought to examine the factors that either facilitated or inhibited young people’s engagement with services. The young people had complex needs and had used multiple services from an early age.
METHODS: The study used in-depth interviews to explore young people’s service experiences. A thematic inductive analysis identified key themes. The concept of making a claim for services emerged as an explanatory device to understand the processes of service engagement.
FINDINGS: Making a claim for services was a critical first step in young people’s engagement with services, representing an ongoing interactive process between young people and service providers. Three key elements comprised a successful claim for services: young people’s needs meeting service entry criteria; personal agency; and, relevant and meaningful service responses.
CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that making a claim for services is a dynamic process and that a cornerstone of effective practice with vulnerable youth involves social workers establishing meaningful relationships with young people. Social workers who make a positive difference in young people’s lives are open to the different ways in which young people express their needs and support them to participate as active partners in interventions.
References
Aaltonen, S. (2013). “Trying to push things through”: Forms and bounds of agency in transitions of school-age young people. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(3), 375–390.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
Berzin, S. (2010). Vulnerability in the transition to adulthood: Defining risk based on youth profiles. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 487–495.
Cormack, D., & Robson, C. (2010). Classification and output of multiple ethnicities: Issues for monitoring Māori health. Wellington, NZ: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare.
Coulshed, V., & Orme, J. (2006). Social work practice: An introduction (4th ed.). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Evans, K. (2007). Concepts of bounded agency in education, work and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 85–93.
French, R., Reardon, M., & Smith, P. (2003). Engaging with a mental health service: Perspectives of at-risk youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 20(6), 529–548.
Jones, J. (2011). Narratives of student engagement in an alternative learning context. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16(3), 219–236.
Lerner, R., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10–16.
Maschi, T., Smith Hatcher, S., Schwalbe, C., & Rosato, N. (2008). Mapping the social service pathways of youth to and through the juvenile justice system. Child and Youth Services Review, 30(12), 1376–1385.
McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 278–286.
Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2011). Embracing the diversity of practice: Indigenous knowledge and mainstream social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(1), 63–77.
Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2015). Negotiating and constructing identity: Social work with young people who experience adversity. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1564–1580.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2015). State of care 2015. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Prior, D., & Mason, P. (2010). A different kind of evidence? Looking for “what works” in engaging young offenders. Youth Justice, 10(3), 211–226.
Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child and Family Social Work, 10(2), 111-123.
Sanders, J., Munford, R., Thimasarn-Anwar, T., Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., Osborne, A-M., … Urry, Y. (2013). Methodological overview—The Pathways to Resilience Study. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2014). Youth-centred practice: Positive youth development
practices and pathways to better outcomes for vulnerable youth. Children and
Youth Services Review, 46, 160–167.
Ungar, M., Liebenberg, L., Dudding, P., Armstrong, M., & van de Vijver, F. (2013). Patterns of
service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37, 150–159.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
