Reciprocity in international student exchange: Challenges posed by neo-colonialism and the dominance of the Western voice

Authors

  • Ines Sofia Zuchowski James Cook University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-203X
  • Narayan Gopalkrishnan James Cook University, Cairns
  • Julie King Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
  • Abraham Francis James Cook University, Townsville

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id235

Keywords:

International student exchange, International social work, Social work education, Reciprocity, Partnership, Neo-colonialism

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Internationalisation of social work education is part of a rapidly growing international tertiary education sector; one that is actively being promoted by governments and universities to support student learning and engagement and to develop global citizens. International partnership programmes form a core part of the internationalisation of social work education, and these programmes may involve inequity in the benefits to the different partners. This article critically reflects on, and explores, concepts of reciprocity and collaboration in international social work student exchanges with a specific focus on exchanges between Australia and the Asia-Pacific.

METHOD: A critical lens was applied to the literature that conceptualises international student exchanges with a particular focus on reciprocity and collaboration. The concept of neo-colonialism is used to explore international student exchanges and consider ways forward; the term is used to refer to newer and more subtle forms of colonialism that are often based on linguistic or cultural domination.  The discussion is further drawn out with anecdotal evidence from the authors’ own long-term engagement with international student exchange as well as an Australian government funded project “Going Places” that explores internationalisation in social work education.

FINDINGS: A critical review of the literature highlights the continued dominance of the Western voice and issues of neo-colonialism as challenges to ensuring equitable processes in the internationalisation of social work education. Reciprocity is a contested concept that needs deep engagement to support transformative partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that concepts of reciprocity, voice and collaboration have to be carefully considered in order to create transformative partnerships in international social work education.

Author Biography

Ines Sofia Zuchowski, James Cook University

Lecturer in Field education in Social Work And Human Services, College of Society, Arts, Society and Education.

References

Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2010). Code of ethics. Canberra, ACT: Author.

AASW. (2012). Australian social work education and accreditation standards ASWEAS 2012 v1.2(1) (pp. 1-27). Canberra, ACT: Author

Aim Overseas (2011). Outbound Mobility Best Practice Guide for Australian Universities. Accessed 12.12.2016 from http://www.studyoverseas.gov.au/sites/studyoverseas/resources/Documents/ombpgau/OMBPG.pdf

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1995). Introduction. In B. Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The post-colonial studies reader (pp. 425–427). London, UK: Routledge.

Askeland, G. A., & Payne, M. (2006). Social work education’s cultural hegemony. International Social Work, 49(6), 731–743.

Bell, M. (2008). Beyond the supermarket: Lost opportunities in summer study abroad for Singapore sojourners in Australia. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 4(1), 61–78.

Bourne, D. (2011). From internationalization to global perspectives. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(5), 559–571. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.598447

Brydon, K., Kamasua, J., Flynn, C., Mason, R., Au, R., Ayius, D., & Hampson, R. (2014). Developing an international social work education collaboration: A partnership approach between Monash University, Australia and University of Papua New Guinea. International Social Work, 57(6), 590–604. doi:10.1177/0020872812444939

Caruana, V., & Spurling, N. (2007). The internationalisation of UK higher education: A review of selected material. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/the_internationalisation_of_uk_he

Cleak, H., & Fox, M. (2011). Current Australian programs for international field placements. In C. Noble & M. Henrickson (Eds.), Social work field education and supervision across Asia Pacific (pp. 23–44). Sydney, NSW: Sydney University Press.

Cranton, P. (2006). Fostering authentic relationships in the transformative classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 109, 5–13.

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2014). The new Colombo Plan. Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved from http://www.dfat.gov.au/new-colombo-plan/about.html

Dominelli, L., & Hackett, S. (2012). Internationalising social work theory and practice. International Social Work, 55, 151–153. doi:10.1177/0020872811435075

Engstrom, D., & Jones, L. P. (2007). A broadened horizon: The value of international social work internships. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 26(2), 136–150.

Enos, S., & Morton, K. (2003). Developing a theory and practice of campus community partnerships. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.), Building partnerships for service-learning (pp. 20–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Grace, M., Townsend, R., Testa, D., Fox, J., O’Maley, P., Custance, J., & Daddow, A. (2013). Student diversity as grass roots internationalisation in social work education. Advances in Social Work & Welfare Education, 15(1), 121–135.

Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York, NY: Palgrave.

Hanlen, P. (2011). Community engagement: Managers’ viewpoints. In C. Noble & M. Hendrickson (Eds.), Social work field education and supervision across Asia Pacific (pp. 221-242). Sydney, NSW: Sydney University Press.

Haug, E. (2005). Critical reflections on the emerging discourse of international social work. International Social Work, 48(2), 126–135.

Healy, L. M. (2001). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Heron, B. (2006). Critically considering international social work practica. Critical Social Work, 7(2). http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/critically-considering-international-social-work-practica

Hokenstad, M. C., Khinduka, S. K., & Midgley, J. (1992). The world of international social work. In M. C. Hokenstad, S. K. Khinduka, & J. Midgley (Eds.), Profiles in international social work (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Hugman, R., Moosa-Mitha, M., & Moyo, O. (2010). Towards a borderless social work: Reconsidering notions of international social work. International Social Work, 53(5), 629–643.

International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2004). Global standards. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/global-standards/

Jamesson, J. K., Clayton, P. H., & Jaeger, A. J. (2011). Community-engaged scholarship through mutually transformative partnerships. In L. Harter, J. Hamel-Lambert, & J. Millesen (Eds.), Participatory partnerships for social action and research (pp. 259–277). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

Jenkins, D. (2015). Denying reciprocity. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(3), 1–21. doi:10.1177/1474885115569513

Jones, E., & Brown, S. (Eds.). (2007). Internationalising higher education. London, UK: Routledge.

Joseph, C. (2008). Difference, subjectivities and power: (De)colonizing practices in internationalizing the curriculum. Intercultural Education, 19(1), 29–39. doi:10.1080/14675980701852350

Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.

Kreitzer, L., & Wilson, M. (2010). Shifting perspectives on international alliances in social work: Lessons from Ghana and Nicaragua. International Social Work, 53(5), 701–719.

Lough, B. J. (2009). Principles of effective practice in international social work field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(3), 467–480. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200800083

Lyons, K., Manion, K., & Carlsen, M. (2006). International perspectives on social work: global conditions and local practice. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan.

Miles, D., Jones, P., Gopalkrishnan, N., Francis, A., Harris, N., Howard, E., … Puthantharayil, G. (2016, July). Contested concepts of “partnership” in international student exchange programs. Proceedings of the 37th HERDSA Annual International Conference; HERSDA 2016: 39th Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual International Conference: The shape of higher education, Freemantle, WA, Australia.

Mirsky, J., & Barasch, M. (2004). Facilitating a reciprocal international exchange in social work. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 7(3), 20–29.

Mukherjee, D (2011) Principles of effective transnational networking for global social work education: A case study, Journal of Global Social Work Practice, 4(1), pp.1–11.

Nickson, A., Briscoe, C., Maconachie, S., & Browskowski, M. (2011). A Vietnamese and Australian cross-cultural field placement using community arts to heal and prevent child trafficking. In C. Noble & M. Henrickson (Eds.), Social work field education and supervision across Asia Pacific (pp. 145–167). Sydney, NSW: Sydney University Press.

Nickson, A., Kuruleca, S., & Clarke, M. (2009). Fijian and Australian social work learning through field education. In C. Noble, M. Henrickson, & I. Y. Han (Eds.), Social work education: Voices from the Asia Pacific (pp. 50–71). Carton North, VIC: The Vulgar Press.

Noble, C. (2004). Social work education, training and standards in the Asia-Pacific region. Social Work Education, 23(5), 527–536. doi:10.1080/0261547042000252262

Nuttman-Schwartz, O., & Berger, R. (2012). Field education in international social work: Where are we and where should we go. International Social Work, 55, 225–243. doi:10.1177/0020872811414597

Payne, M. & Askeland, G. A. (2008). Globalization and international social work: Postmodern change and challenge. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.

Raju, K. (2014). Resilient social work –The gracious way. New Delhi, India: Ane Books.

Razack, N. (2002). A critical examination of international student exchanges. International Social Work, 45(2), 251–265.

Razack, N. (2005). “Bodies on the move”: Spatialized locations, identities, and nationality in international work. Social Justice, 32(4), 87–104.

Razack, N. (2009). Decolonizing the pedagogy and practice of international social work. International Social Work, 52(1), 9–21. doi:10.1177/0020872808097748

Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.

Schattle, H. (2008). The practices of global citizenship. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Stearns, P. (2009). Educating global citizens in colleges and universities. New York, NY: Routledge.

Tasse, A. (2006). News and views . . . from IASSW. International Social Work, 49(1), 137–139.

Tesoriero, F., & Vicary, A. (2007, October) Achieving an ethical Australian-Indian relationship through a reciprocal student mobility program in social work., 1-9. Paper presented at the Australian International Education Conference. Retrieved from http://aiec.idp.com/uploads/pdf/paper_Tesoriero&Vicary.pdf

Thomas, J. P., & Worrall, T. (2002). Gift-giving, quasi-credit and reciprocity. Rationality and Society, 14(3), 308–352. doi:10.1177/1043463102014003003

Universities Australia. (2013). An agenda for Australian Higher Education 2013–2016. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/

Downloads

Published

2017-03-31

How to Cite

Zuchowski, I. S., Gopalkrishnan, N., King, J., & Francis, A. (2017). Reciprocity in international student exchange: Challenges posed by neo-colonialism and the dominance of the Western voice. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id235

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 1 (2017)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.