An adventurous journey: Social workers guiding customer service workers on the welfare frontline

Greg Hall, Jennifer Boddy, Lesley Chenoweth

Abstract


INTRODUCTION: This paper explores a reform to worker relationships at the frontline of the Australian income support and government service provider (Centrelink). Reform involved social workers providing guidance to customer service workers and working closely with them in order to improve interactions with people seeking assistance.

METHODS: A case study traced reform in two Centrelink offices over one year, and included semi-structured interviews and observations with social workers and customer service workers. A thematic analysis highlighted the nature of changes to worker relationships over time, and how new relationships supported new organizational practices.

FINDINGS: Customer service workers initially reported both anxiety and excitement, expressing admiration of social workers’ skills and knowledge. Over time, they emphasised the inspiration and interpersonal support social workers provided them, how this helped them deal with difficult situations and was missed when not available. Social workers’ initial scepticism around demands on their time and challenges to their professionalism gave way (in part) to a sense of influencing and guiding workers towards more humanising interactions, although some concerns and organizational tensions remained.

CONCLUSION: Guidance to other workers is a form of leadership which fits well with social work’s relational, supportive potential. Tensions in the welfare context mean that providing guidance is both rewarding and challenging, taking social workers on an adventurous journey involving adversity and (self) discovery.


Keywords


relational social work; income support; customer service; professional identity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (Eds.). (1998). Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Australian Department of Human Services. (2013). Using strengths and building relationships. Canberra: Australian Department of Human Services.

Dearman, P. (2005). Computerized social casework recording: Autonomy and control in Australia’s income support agency. Labor Studies Journal, 30(1), 47-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lab.2005.0026

Diaz, L. (2008). Social work in Centrelink: Inside out of outside in? In J. R. Owen & F. Khavarpour (Eds.), Voices from the coalface: Practitioner perspectives about the nature and challenges of community-based work. Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground.

Dybicz, P. (2012). The hero(ine) on a journey: A postmodern conceptual framework for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(2), 267-283.

Eardley, T., Brown, J., Rawsthorne, M., Norris, K., & Emrys, L. (2005). The impact of breaching on income support customers: Final report. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Folgheraiter, F. (2004). Relational social work: Toward networking and societal practices. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development. (2014). Asia-Pacific region. International Social Work, 57, 25-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872814531882

Hall, G., Boddy, J., & Chenoweth, L. (2014). In the shadow of Rashomon: Pursuing polyphony in practice case studies within the Australian social security environment.Nordic Social Work Research, 4,(S1), 102–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.928646

Hall, G., Hadson, D., Boddy, J., & Chenoweth, L. (2014). Talking with teen parents, hearing young families: (In)forming welfare reform through local relations. Child & Youth Services, 35(3), 255–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2014.938737

Hall, G., Boddy, J., Chenoweth, L., & Davie, K. (2012). Mutual benefits: Developing relational service approaches within Centrelink. Australian Social Work, 65(1), 87–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.594956

Howard, C. (2012). The contradictions of individualized activation policy: Explaining the rise and demise of One to One Service in Australia. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 655-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430456

Hughes, M., & Wearing, M. (2013). Organisations and management in social work (2nd ed.). London:Sage.

Hyslop, I. (2011). Social work as a practice of freedom. Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 404-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468017310388362

Kafka, F. (1997). The castle. London: Penguin.

Kennedy, M., & Corliss, M. (2008). Tension at the interface: Exploring employee deviation. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(4), 424-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003187

Maidment, J. (2006). The quiet remedy: A dialogue on reshaping professional relationships. Families in Society, 87(1), 115-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3491

Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘heroic agency’ in conceptualizing social workers as policy actors in the Twenty-First Century. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 1022–1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs062

McCashen, W. (2005). The strengths approach: A strengths-based resource for sharing power and creating change. Bendigo: St Lukes Innovative Resources.

McDonald, C., & Chenoweth, L. (2009). (Re) shaping social work: An Australian case study. British Journal of Social Work, 39 (1): 144-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm094

McDonald, C., & Marston, G. (2006). Room to move? Professional discretion at the frontline of welfare-to-work. Australian journal of social issues, 41(2), 171-182.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Murphy, J., Murray, S., Chalmers, J., Martin, S., & Marston, G. (2011). Half a citizen – Life on welfare in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of innovation in public services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Robertson, A.S., & Haight, W. (2012). Engaging child welfare-involved families impacted by substance misuse: Scottish policies and practices. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1992-2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.06.006

Rogowski, S. (2010). Social work: The rise and fall of a profession. Bristol: Policy Press.

Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (2010). Relationship-based practice: Getting to the heart of practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Scourfield, P. (2013). Even further beyond street-level bureaucracy: The dispersal of discretion exercised in decisions made in older people's care home reviews. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 914-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct175

Seikkula, J. & Arnkil, T (2006). Dialogical Meetings in Social Networks. London: H. Karnac.

Spratt, T., Nett, J., Bromfield, L., Hietamäki, J., Kindler, H., & Ponnert, L. (2014). Child protection in Europe: Development of an international cross-comparison model to inform national policies and practices. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1508-1525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu109

Tonkens, E., & Verplanke, L. (2013). When social security fails to provide emotional security: Single parent households and the contractual welfare state. Social Policy and Society, 12(3), 451-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000110

Trevillion, S. (1999). Networking and community partnership. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Trevithick, P. (2014). Humanising managerialism: Reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 287-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.926868




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss3id244

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.