Multiple holding: A model for supervision in the context of trauma and abuse

Authors

  • Claire Virtue A registered psychotherapist, group facilitator and supervisor in private practice and a staff member with the Institute of Psychosynthesis (NZ)
  • Christa Fouché Associate Professor in the School of Counselling, Human Services and Social Work at The University of Auckland.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss4id262

Keywords:

supervision, grounded theory study, trauma and abuse, multiple holding,

Abstract

This paper reports on a grounded theory study involving eight practitioners; four supervisees and four supervisors took part in individual interviews and two separate focus groups.The core finding of the research is that multiple holding is needed to provide adequate support for professionals working with trauma and abuse. Multiple holding is a term for the processes practitioners can use to enable them to remain working in the field of trauma and abuse and includes relational supervision, knowledge and skills and the use of resources outside the supervision relationship. The identified outside resources are: spirituality; personal therapy; collegiality; and training specific to trauma and abuse. Supervisors need to be part of a chain of holding where they in turn are held by their own supervisors, who, in turn, in an ongoing sequence, are also held in a chain of supervision and holding. Being able to choose a supervisor was found to be important to build a high level of trust in the supervisee/supervisor relationship.

References

Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2004). Code of ethics: New clauses. Dunedin, New Zealand: Author.

Badger, K., Royse, D., & Craig, C. (2008). Hospital social workers and indirect trauma: An exploratory study of contributing factors. Health and Social Work, 33(1), 63-71.

Brady, J., Guy, J., Poelestra, P., & Brokaw, B. (1999). Vicarious traumatisation, spirituality and the treatment of sexual abuse survivors: A national survey of women psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(4), 386-393.

Brown, L. (2004). Feminist paradigms of trauma treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 41(4), 464-471.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. (1994). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Eagle, G. (2005). Grasping the thorn: The impact and supervision of traumatic stress therapy in the South African context. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 15(2), 197-207.

Enns, C. (2004). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies: Origins, themes, and variations (2nd ed.). New York: Haworth Press.

Etherington, K. (2000). Supervising counsellors who work with survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 13(4), 377-389.

Etherington, K. (2009). Supervising helpers who work with the trauma of sexual abuse. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 3(2), 179-194.

Geller, D., Norcross, J., & Orlinsky, D. (2005). The psychotherapist’s own psychotherapy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Adeline.

Goodyear-Smith, F., Lobb, B., & Mansell J. (2005). Sexual abuse counselling: Treatment rates provided by psychiatrists, psychologists and counsellors under ACC funding. New Zealand Family Physician, 3, 389-393.

Hanna, S. (2007). Not so strange! An application of attachment theory and feminist psychology to social work supervision. Social Work Review, 19(3), 12-22.

Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Hewson, D. (1999). Empowerment in supervision. Feminism & Psychology, 9, 406-9.

Howard, F. (1997). Supervision. In H. Love & W. Whittaker (Eds.), Practice issues for clinical and applied psychologists in New Zealand (pp. 340-357). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Psychological Society.

Keddy, B., Sims, S., & Stern, P. (1996). Grounded theory and feminist research methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 448-453.

Knight, C. (2005). Working with survivors of childhood trauma: Implications for clinical supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 23(2), 81-105.

McCann, L., & Pearlman, L. (1990). Vicarious traumatisation: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies, 3(1), 131-149.

McGregor, K. (2001). Therapy guidelines: Adult survivors of child sexual abuse. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Compensation Corporation. Retrieved May 25, 2007, from the Accident Compensation Corporation Website: http://www.acc.co.nz/DIS_EXT_CSMP/groups/external_providers/documents/internet/wcm2_020341.pdf

Messler Davies, J., & Frawley, M. (1994). Treating the adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse: A psychoanalytic perspective. Glasgow: Basic.

New Zealand Association of Counsellors (2002). Code of ethics. Hamilton, New Zealand: Author.

New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists (2004). Code of ethics. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

New Zealand Herald (2007). Balloons mark launch of child protection programme (2007, March 30). Retrieved 20 February 2010 from New Zealand Herald website: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10431724

Pack, M. (2004). Sexual abuse counsellors’ response to stress and trauma: A social work perspective. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 25(2), 1-17.

Pack, M. (2009). Supervision as a liminal space: Towards a dialogic relationship. Gestalt Journal of Australia and New Zealand, 5(2), 68-78.

Pearlman, L., & MacIan, P. (1995). Vicarious traumatisation: An empirical study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(6), 558-565.

Rock, M. (1997). Psychodynamic supervision. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

Thomas, C. (2005). What’s in a name? Strengths-based supervision – reality or rhetoric: An analysis of supervision in an organisation with strengths-based practice. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Walker, M. (2004). Supervising practitioners working with survivors of childhood abuse: Countertransference, secondary traumatization and terror. Psychodynamic Practice, 10(2), 173–193.

Wood, E., & Kunze, K. (2004). Making New Zealand fit for children: Promoting a national plan of action for New Zealand children (Violence, exploitation and abuse section). Wellington: UNICEF New Zealand.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-01

How to Cite

Virtue, C., & Fouché, C. (2009). Multiple holding: A model for supervision in the context of trauma and abuse. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 21(4), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss4id262

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 4 (2009): Vol 22, No 1

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.