Revisions to the therapeutic relationship: A qualitative inquiry into sexual abuse therapists’ theories for practice as a mitigating factor in vicarious traumatisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss4id263Keywords:
sexual abuse counselling, counselling, sexual abuse, social work, trauma, traumatic disclosures, new trauma theory,Abstract
This article reports a qualitative study which explores sexual abuse counsellors’ theories for practice and how they say they develop and use an array of theoretical approaches to support their well-being and clinical effectiveness over time. Half the sample of Accident Compensation Commission (ACC) registered therapists were social workers who subsequently trained in other professions such as counselling and psychotherapy. The findings suggest that social workers who engage with traumatic disclosures from their clients actively evolve strategies and resources that act to buffer the more negative effects of the work with sexual abuse survivors, which is a means of ameliorating vicarious traumatisation.
Whilst there was little theory specific to trauma work in the early 1980s when the research participants were practising, they developed a framework for their practice based in practice and personal experiences. These developed insights and reference to diverse strands of theory together constitute a framework for practice that assists the counsellors’ in their understanding of their clients, the dynamics of the therapeutic relationship, organisational constraints on funding that surround their work, and their own self care. The theoretical frameworks that the participants preferred to use derive from social justice principles, feminist, narrative theories and the ‘New Trauma Therapy’ (Coffey 1998). Recommendations for clinician self care in dealing with traumatic disclosures with reference to a range of theoretical approaches are suggested.
References
Accident Compensation Commission. (1998). ACC Register of Approved Counsellors. Wellington: Author.
Accident Compensation Commission. (2007). ACC Sensitive Claims’ Treatment Providers Newsletter. Wellington: Author.
Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (2009). Critical practice in social work. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Mcmillan.
Badger, K., Royse, D., & Craig, C. (2008). Hospital social workers and indirect trauma exposure: An exploratory study of contributing factors. Health and Social Work, 33(1), 63-71.
Briere, J. (1996). Therapy for adults molested as children: Beyond survival. New York: Springer Publishing.
Coffey, R. (1998). Unspeakable truths and happy endings: Human cruelty and the New Trauma Therapy. New York: Sidran Press.
Courtois, C. A. (1988). Healing the incest wound: Adult survivors in therapy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Courtois, C. A. (1997). Healing the incest wound: A treatment update with attention to recovered memory issues. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(4), 464-497.
Cunningham, M. (2003). Impact of trauma work on social work clinicians: Empirical findings. Social Work, 48(4), 451-59.
Dalenberg, C. (2000). Countertransference and the treatment of trauma. La Jolla Calf: American Psychological Association.
Davis, L., & Bass, E. (1992). The courage to heal (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.
Dutton, M. A. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman: A model for assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Publishing.
Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London: Sage.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (Myra Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Seabury.
Geertz, C. (1975). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. London: Basic Books.
Gelso, C. J., & Hayes, J. A. (2007). Countertransference and the therapist’s inner experience: Perils and possibilities. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayward, J. (2009, October 17). Letter to the Editor. Listener.
Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York, Basic Books.
Kay, M. (2009, October 28). Review of sex abuse compo. Dominion Post.
McCann, I. L., & Pearlman, L. A. (1990). Vicarious traumatisation: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3(1), 131-149.
Moulden, H. M., & Firestone, P. (2007). Vicarious traumatisation: The impact on therapists who work with sexual offenders. Trauma Violence and Abuse, 8(1), 67-83.
Pack, M. J. (2004). Sexual abuse counsellors’ responses to stress and trauma: A social work perspective. New Zealand Journal of Counselling, 25(2), 1-17.
Pack, M. J. (Forthcoming) Transformation in progress: The effects of trauma on the significant others of sexual abuse therapists. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice.
Pearlman L. A., & MacIan, P. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatisation: An empirical study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 26, 558-565.
Pearlman, L. A., & Saakvitne, K. W. (1995). Trauma and the therapist: Countertransference and vicarious traumatisation in psychotherapy with incest survivors. New York: Norton.
Pearlman, L. A., Saakvitne, K.W., & Staff of the Traumatic Stress Institute. (1996). Transforming the pain: A workbook on vicarious traumatisation for helping professionals who work with traumatised clients. New York: Norton.
Reason, P. (Ed.). (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage Publications.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Steed, L. G., & Downing, R. (1998). Vicarious traumatisation amongst psychologists and professional counsellors working in the field of sexual abuse/assault. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies. Retrieved on 1 May 2009 at http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/1998-2/steed.htm
Yin, R. (1985). Case study research. New York: Sage Publications
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
