Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: A social work intervention?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss4id264Keywords:
health social work, mental health social work, mental health, dialectical behaviour therapy,Abstract
This article introduces the mental health treatment, Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) as a dynamic and challenging therapy well suited to a critical social work perspective. From the authors’ experience of providing DBT in a tertiary health setting over the past three years, the connections between DBT and social work will be espoused with the central tenet being the demonstration that psychiatric social workers are highly skilled once trained in this modalityReferences
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers Inc. (2006). Information for new members. Christchurch: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers.
Asay, T. P., & Lambert, M. J. (1999). The empirical case for the common factors in therapy. In M. Hubble, B. Duncan, & S. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23-55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cohen-Katz, J., Wiley, S., Capuano, T., Baker, D., & Shapiro, S. (2004). The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on nurse stress and burnout: As quantitative and qualitative study. Holistic Nursing Practice, 18(6), 302-308.
De Jong, P., & Miller, S. (1995). How to interview for client strengths. Social Work, 40(6), 729-736.
Dimeff, L., & Koerner, K. (Eds.). (2007). Dialectical behaviour therapy in clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press.
Dorland, W. (2007). Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary (31st Ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier.
Drake, R., & Goldman, E. (Eds.). (2003). Evidence-based practices in mental health care. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
Germer, C.K., Siegel, R.D. & Fulton, P.R. (2005). (Eds.) Mindfulness and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
International Federation of Social Workers (2000). Definition of social work. Retrieved April 13 2010 from http://www.ifsw.org/en/p38000208.html
Koons, C., Robins, C., Tweed, J., Lynch, T., Gonzalez, A., Morse, G., Bishop, G., Butterfield, M., & Bastian, L. (2001). ‘Efficacy of dialectical behaviour therapy in women veterans with borderline personality disorder’. Behaviour Therapy, 32, 371-390.
Lew, M., Matta, C., Tripp-Tebo, C., & Watts, D. (2006). Dialectical behaviour therapy for individuals with intellectual disabilities: A program description. Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 9(1), 1-12.
Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
Linehan, M.M., Armstrong, H.E., Suarez, A., Allmon, D. & Heard, H.L. (1991). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of chronically parasuicidal patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48(12), 1060-4.
Linehan, M., Dimeff, L., & Reynolds, S. (2002). Dialectical behaviour therapy versus comprehensive validation plus 12-step for the treatment of opioid dependent women meeting criteria for borderline personality disorder. Drug Alcohol Dependency, 67, 3-26.
Linehan, M., Heard, H., & Armstrong, H. (1993). Naturalistic follow-up of a behavioural treatment for chronically parasuicidal borderline patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 961-974.
Linehan, M., Scmidt, H., & Dimeff, L. (1999). Dialectical behaviour therapy for patients with borderline personality disorder and drug-dependence. American Journal of Addictions, 8, 279-292.
Linehan, M., Tutek, D., Heard, H., & Armstrong, H. (1994). Interpersonal outcome of cognitive behavioural treatment for chronically suicidal borderline patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1771-1776.
Lynch, T., Morse, J., Mendelson, T., & Robins, C. (2003). Dialectical behaviour therapy for depressed older adults: A randomized pilot study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 33-45.
MacLaren, C., & Freeman, A. (2007). Cognitive behavior therapy model and techniques. In T. Ronen and A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy in clinical social work practice (pp. 25-44). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
Marra, T. (2005). Dialectical behaviour therapy in private practice. Oakland. CA: New Harbinger.
May, S., & O’Donovan, A. (2007). The advantages of the mindful therapist. Psychotherapy in Australia, 13(4), 46-53.
Miller, A., & Rathus, J. (2006). Dialectical behaviour therapy for suicidal adolescents. New York: Guildford Press.
Miller, A., Rathus, J., Leigh, E., & Landsman, M. (1996). A pilot study: Dialectical behaviour therapy adapted for suicidal adolescents. Poster presented at the first annual meeting of the International Society for the Improvement and Teaching of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (ISITDBT), New York.
Miller, W. R., Taylor, C. A., & West, J. C. (1980). Focused versus broad spectrum behavior therapy for problem drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 590-601.
O’Donoghue, K. (2004). Uniprofessional, multiprofessional, field of practice discipline: Social workers and cross disciplinary supervision. Retrieved 30 June 2006 from http://www.geocities.com/kieranodsw/crossdisciplinarysup.
Oliver, J. P. J., & Hudson, B. L. (1998). Behavioural work, crisis intervention and the mental health call-out. In K. Cigno and D. Bourn (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioural social work in practice (pp. 201-220). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Reber, A. (1988). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin.
Roberts, A. R., Yeager, K., & Regehr, C. (2006). Bridging evidence-based health care and social work. In A. Roberts and K. R. Yeager (Eds.), Foundations of evidence-based social work practice (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ronen, T., & Freeman, A. (2007). Introduction. In T. Ronen and A. Freeman (Eds.). Cognitive behavior therapy in clinical social work practice (pp. xix-xxx). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
Ronen, T. (2007). Clinical social work and its commonalities with cognitive behavior therapy. In T. Ronen and A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy in clinical social work practice (pp. 3-24). New York: Springer Publishing.
Seden, J. (1999). Relevant skills for social work practice. Counselling skills in social work practice (pp. 1-18). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Smart, R., & Gray, M. (2000). Working with cultural difference. In L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.). Fieldwork in the human services (pp. 96-109). St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Swenson, C. R. (2000). How can we account for DBT’s widespread popularity? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(1), 87-91.
Telch, C., Agras, W., & Linehan, M. (2002). Group dialectical behaviour therapy for binge eating disorder: A preliminary uncontrolled trial. Behaviour Therapy, 31, 559-582.
Thomas, C., & Davis, S. (2005). Bicultural strengths-based supervision. In M. Nash, R. Munford and K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Social work theories in action (pp. 189-204). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Thomas, G. (2007). The power of the therapeutic relationship: Bringing balance to evidence-based practice. Practice Notes. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 19(4), 55-66.
Trevithick, P. (2000). Social work skills: A practice handbook. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tsui, (2005). Social work supervision contexts and concepts. Thousand Oaks: California. Sage Publications.
Vander Zanden, J. W., Crandell, T. L., & Crandell, C. H. (2007). Human development (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Weld, N., & Appleton, C. (2008). Walking in people’s worlds: A practical and philosophical guide to social work. Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.
Yassen, J., & Harvey, M. (1998). Crisis assessment and interventions with victims of violence. In P. M. Kleespies (Ed.), Emergencies in mental health practice (117-143). New York: Guilford Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.