Critical Language Awareness: A beckoning frontier in social work education?
Keywords:Critical Language Awareness, Social Work Education, Critical Pedagogy,
INTRODUCTION: Effective social work practice is predicated on empowering, inclusive and culturally responsive communication, and yet, there appears to be very limited focus on language awareness, let alone critical language awareness, in contemporary social work education—both within and beyond the Australasia context. This gap is more worrying against a background where neoliberal and instrumental discourses (Habermas, 1969; O’Regan, 2001) have freely proliferated, and now threaten to colonise virtually all areas of private and public life (Chouliaraki & Fairclough, 1999). In response, this article advocates the inclusion of Critical Language Awareness (CLA) in contemporary social work education.
APPROACH: This article initially maps the broad scope and historical emergence of CLA, before surveying its key political and theoretical influences.
FINDINGS: The key outcome is that CLA—as delineated—clearly shares significant overlaps with social work co-values, particularly: justice, equality and a commitment to anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice (Dominelli, 2002; Payne, 1997). More importantly, CLA provides conceptual and analytical resources that promise to significantly sharpen students’ abilities to recognise, question and ultimately challenge, oppressive discourses (Fairclough, 2011; Manjarres, 2011; Wodak, 2006).
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that CLA strands be woven into existing social work themes and topics. The final part of the article offers some practical suggestions on how this could be done.
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London, UK: New Left Books.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1987). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Bernstein, B. (1972). A sociolinguistic approach to socialisation with some reference to educability. In J. J. Gumperz & D. H. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 465–497). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130.
Blommaert, J., & Bulcean, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chouliuaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Collerson, J. (1994). English grammar: A functional approach. Sydney, NSW: PETA.
De Saussure, F. (1916). Course in general linguistics. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Diamond, I., & Quinby, L. (Eds.). (1988). Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London, UK: Longmans.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to discourse analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse Analysis (pp. 162–186). London, UK: SAGE..
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. London, UK: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1. London, UK: Penguin.
Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. Caldas-Coultard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Readings in critical discourse analysis. (pp. 3–14). London, UK: Routledge.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London, UK: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International.
Habermas, J. (1969). On ideology and social change. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Hart, C., & Lukes, D. (Eds.). (2007). Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory. Newcastle. UK: Cambridge Scholar Publishers.
Iedema, R. (2004). Review article on: Kieran O'Halloran (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press. Linguistics and Education, 15, 413-423.
International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from: http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/
Jackson, L. (1994). The dematerialisation of Karl Marx. London, UK; New York, NY: Longman.
Kress, G. (1996). Representational resources and the production of subjectivity. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Hodge, B. (1979). Language as ideology. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1990). Reading images. London, UK: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and the novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96–110.
Manjarres, B. (2011). Critical discourse analysis: A review of the critique. Language 35(1), 219-242.
Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London, UK: Continuum.
Musolff, A. (2007). Is there such a thing as discourse history? The case of metaphor. In C. Hart & D. Lukes (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory (pp. 1–27). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
O’Regan, J. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. [Review of the book Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis, by L. Chouliaraki & N. Fairclough]. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1(2), 115–135.
Payne, M. (1997). The three pillars of social work. [Unpublished conference paper presented at a Social Work conference in Beijing]. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/13917710/The-three-pillars-of-social-work
Pecheux, M. (1982). Language, semantics and ideology. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sim, S. (1995). Derrida and the end of history (postmodern encounters). Cambridge, UK: Icon Books.
Titscher, S. Meyer, M. Vetter, E., & Wodak, R. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
The Guardian. (2016). Donald Trump Jr compares Syrian refugees to poisoned Skittles. [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/20/donald-trump-jnr-compares-refugees-poisoned-skittles-twitter-reacted
Van der Hoek, W. (2000). [Review of the book Nonmonotonic reasoning, by G. Antoniou]. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9, 125-128
Van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Context and experience models in discourse processing. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 123–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Volosinov, N. V. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179–190.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.