Embodied interpretation: Assessing the knowledge produced through a dance-based inquiry
Keywords:arts-based inquiry, dance-based research, interpretation, knowledge, self-injury
INTRODUCTION: Although the field of social work has experienced an exponential increase in the use of arts-based methodology, the way in which knowledge shared through artful presentations is understood by audience members remains understudied. As arts-based inquiry often involves active co-construction of meanings between researchers, participants and audiences, it is crucial for social work researchers to scrutinise the process of meaning making by audience members. In this article, we explore how audience members make sense of research findings presented through improvisational dance and how the provision of information about the dance may influence viewer responses.
METHODS: A personal experience with self-injury documented in a creative poem was represented through the performance of improvisational dance pieces and assessed by two groups of viewers, with and without knowledge of the topic of the dances. The viewers were prompted to interpret the dances by reflecting on the feelings, thoughts and perceptions they had while watching the performance. A thematic analysis was conducted to compare and contrast the responses of the two groups
FINDINGS: By comparing the interpretations of informed and uninformed viewers, we suggest that interpretation can be influenced by normative, socially constructed assumptions that hinder empathic and action-inspiring engagement.
CONCLUSION: We conclude the article with a discussion of potential implications for social work research, practice and education.
Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. Oxon, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Psychology Press; Routledge.
Ashcroft, R., & Van Katwyk, T. (2016). An examination of the biomedical paradigm: A view of social work. Social Work in Public Health, 31(3), 140–152.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S. (1995). Dance as a mode of research representation. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(4), 391–401.
Boydell, Katherine M. (2011). Making sense of collective events: The co-creation of a research-based dance [43 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 5. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110155.
Brickell, K., & Garrett, B. (2015). Storytelling domestic violence: Feminist politics of participatory video in Cambodia. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(3), 928–953.
Cancienne, M. B., & Bagley, C. (2008). Dance as method: The process and product of movement in educational research. In P. Liamputtong & J. Rumbold (Eds.), Knowing differently: Arts-based and collaborative research methods (pp. 169–186). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Chambon, A. S. (1999). Foucault's approach: Making the familiar visible. In A. S. Chambon, A. Irving, & L. Epstein (Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 51–81). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Cobb, A. K., & Forbes, S. (2002). Qualitative research what does it have to offer to the gerontologist? The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(4), M197–M202.
Cole, P. (2002). Aboriginalizing methodology: Considering the canoe. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 447–459.
Daley, A. (2010). Reflections on reflexivity and critical reflection as critical research practices. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(1), 68–82.
Denzin, N. K. (2000). Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Giardina, M. D. (2006). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769–782.
Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly 5, 1. Retrieved from http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.
Eisner, E. (2006). Does arts-based research have a future? Inaugural lecture for the first European conference on arts-based research, Belfast, Northern Ireland, June 2005. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 9–18.
Finley, S. (2003). Arts-based inquiry in QI: Seven years from crisis to guerrilla warfare. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 281–296.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th anniversary edition. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
Furman, R., Lietz, C., & Langer, C. L. (2006). The research poem in international social work: Innovations in qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 24–34.
Glass, R. (2008). Observer response to contemporary dance. In R. Grove, C. Stevens, & S. McKechnie (Eds.), Thinking in four dimensions: Creativity and cognition in contemporary dance (pp. 107–121). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
Hunter, A., Lusardi, P., Zucker, D., Jacelon, C., & Chandler, G. (2002). Making meaning: The creative component in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 12(3), 388–398.
Jola, C., Ehrenberg, S., & Reynolds, D. (2012). The experience of watching dance: Phenomenological-neuroscience duets. Phenomenology and The Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 17–37.
Monteith, M. J., & Walters, G. L. (1998). Egalitarianism, moral obligation, and prejudice-related personal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 186–199.
Moules, N. J., Field, J. C., McCaffrey, G. P., Laing, C. M. (2014). Conducting hermeneutic research: The address of the topic. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, 7, 1–13.
O’Donoghue, D. (2009). Are we asking the wrong questions in arts-based research? Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 352–368.
Pearce, K., &Coholic, D. (2013). A photovoice exploration of the lived experiences of a small group of aboriginal adolescent girls living away from their home communities. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal & Indigenous Community Health, 11(1), 113–124.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
Seko, Y. (2013). Picturesque wounds: A multimodal analysis of self-injury photographs on Flickr. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1302229
Seko, Y., Kidd, S. A., Wiljer, D., & McKenzie, K. J. (2015). On the creative edge exploring motivations for creating non-suicidal self-injury content online. Qualitative Health Research, 25(10), 1334–1346.
Seko, Y., & Lewis, S. P. (2016). The self-harmed, visualized and reblogged: (Re)making of self-injury narratives on Tumblr, New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816660783
Sinner, A., Leggo, C., Irwin, R. L., Gouzouasis, P., & Grauer, K. (2006). Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(4), 1223–1270.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Zed Books.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
Whisenhunt, J. L., Chang, C. Y., Flowers, L. R., Brack, G. L., O'Hara, C., & Raines, T. C. (2014). Working with clients who self‐injure: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(4), 387–397.
White, V., & Belliveau, G. (2011). Multiple perspectives, loyalties and identities: Exploring intrapersonal spaces through research‐based theatre. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 227–238.
Yi, J., & Zebrack, B. (2010). Self-portraits of families with young adult cancer survivors: Using photovoice. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 28(3), 219–243.
Ylönen, M. E. (2003). Bodily flashes of dancing women: Dance as a method of inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 554–568.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.