Resituating Aotearoa New Zealand mental health legislation in the context of social and occupational justice
Keywords:Mental health, legislation, social justice, occupational justice
INTRODUCTION: Social work and occupational therapy mental health practitioners face a range of tensions in relation to statutory obligations in the context of maintaining a focus on the ideals of social or occupational justice.
APPROACH: The aim of this article is to highlight some of the complexities for social work and occupational therapy practitioners in an environment dominated by a medico-legal worldview. Those complexities include creating and maintaining a therapeutic relationship, adhering to legal obligations; and staying focused on professional values and beliefs. We have explored notions of social justice and occupational justice and undertaken a descriptive chronological review of Aotearoa New Zealand mental health legislation.
IMPLICATIONS: We have provided an insight in to some of the key factors that have influenced the development of mental health legislation in this country in relation to social and occupational justice. We have considered how the medico-legal worldview influences staying true to the notions of social and occupational justice and have made suggestions for change relative to practice and the legislation.
Anderson, M. (2000). A strain towards consensus? The individual, the family, and New Zealand’s mental health (compulsory assessment and treatment) amendment bill 1999. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7(1), 111–118. doi:10.1080/13218710009524976
Anthony, W. (1991). Recovery from mental illness. The new vision of the mental health system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 16, 11–23. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/prj/
Ball, C. A. (2010). Mental health legislation in New Zealand since 1846 to date: A discourse analysis. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Eastern Institute of Technology, Taradale, NZ. Retrieved from http://repository.digitalnz.org/system/uploads/record/attachment/646/mental_health_legislation_in_new_zealand_from_1846_to_date__a_discourse_analysis.pdf
Bell, S. A., & Brookbanks, W. J. (1998). Mental health law in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Brookers.
Bell, S. A., & Brookbanks, W. J. (2005). Mental health law in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Brookers.
Bernays, E. L. (1945). Public relations. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Bilz, K., & Nadler, J. (2014), Law, moral attitudes, and behavioural change. In E. Zamir & D. Teichman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioural economics and the law (pp. 247–267). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brunton. W. (2005). The place of public inquiries in shaping New Zealand’s national mental health policy 1858–1996 Australian and New Zealand Health Policy, 10(24). doi:10.1186/1743-8462-2-24
Campion, M. (2012). Mental health and legal landscapes. In C. Coleborne (Ed.), Changing times, changing places: From Tokanui Hospital to mental health services in the Waikato, 1910–2012 (pp. 13-26). Hamilton, New Zealand: Half Court Press.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ONT: CAOT Publications ACE.
Clearly, M. (2003). The challenges of mental health care reform for contemporary mental health nursing practice: Relationships, power and control. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 12(2), 139–147. doi:10.1046/j1440-0979.2003.00280x
Coleborne, C., & Mackinnon, D. (2006). Psychiatry and its institutions in Australia and New Zealand: An overview. International Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 371–380. doi/pdf/10.1080/09540260600813248
Deegan, P. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11, 11–19. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/prj/
Dowbiggin, I. R. (1997). Keeping America sane: Psychiatry and eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880-1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Durocher, E., Rappolt, S., & Gibson, B. E. (2014). Occupational justice: Future directions. Journal of Occupational Science 21(4), 431–442. doi:101.1080/14427591.2013.775693
Ernst, W. (1991). The social history of Pākehā psychiatry in nineteenth-century New Zealand: Main themes. In L. Bryder (Ed.), A healthy country: Essays on the social history of medicine in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.
Fishwick, M., Tait, B., & O’Brien, A. J. (2001). Unearthing the conflicts between carer and custodian: Implications of participation in Section 16 hearings under the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act (1992). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 10, 187–194. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0979.2001.00209.x
Galton, F. (1907). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. New York, NY: Dutton.
Gibbs, A., Dawson, J., & Mullen, R. (2005). Community treatment orders for people with serious mental illness: A New Zealand study. British Journal of Social Work, 1–16. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch392
Gordon, S., & O’Brien, A. (2014). New Zealand’s mental health legislation needs reform to avoid discrimination. New Zealand Medical Journal, 127(1403), 55–65. Retrieved from https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal
Hamedi, A. (2014). The concept of justice in Greek philosophy (Plato and Aristotle). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27), 1163–1167. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n27.p1163
Hospital and Related Services Taskforce. (1988). Unshackling the hospitals: Report from the Hospital and Related Services Taskforce. Wellington, New Zealand: Author
Hoult. A. (2007). Institutional responses to mental deficiency in New Zealand, 1911–1935: Tokanui Mental Hospital (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Waikato, Hamilton. Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/2412/thesis.pdf?sequence=1
Khoury, E., & Rodriguez del Barrio, L. (2015). Recover-orientated mental practice: A social work perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 45, Supplement 1, i27–i44. doi:10.1093/bjsww/bcv092
McCranie, A. (2011). Recovery from mental illness: The roots, meanings, and implementations of a “new” services movement. In D. Pilgrim, A. Rogers, & B. Pescosolido (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mental health and illness (pp. 471–489). London: SAGE Publications.
Mental Health Commission. (2012). Blueprint II: Improving mental health and wellbeing for all New Zealanders: How things need to be. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
Ministry of Health. (1984). Review of the Mental Health Act 1969: Discussion papers. Retrieved from http://www.moh.govt.nz/notebook/nbbooks.nsf/0/23E0DEF68DF843CE4C2565D70018AA3F/$file/review%20of%20the%20mental%20health%20act%201969.pdf
Ministry of Health (2012). Rising to the challenge: The mental health and addiction services plan 2012–2017. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
New Zealand Legal Information Institute. (1935). Mental Defectives Amendment Act 1935 (26 GEO V 1935 No 7). Retrieved from http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/mdaa193526gv1935n7320/
New Zealand Legal Information Institute. (1951). 1951 No 47 Mental Defectives Amendment. Retrieved from http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/mdaa19511951n47275.pdf
New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2013). New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Retrieved from http://www.justice.govt.nz/policy/constitutional-law-and-human-rights/human-rights/domestic-human-rights-protection/about-the-new-zealand-bill-of-rights-act/copy_of_new-zealand-bill-of-rights-act-1990
Newton-Howes, G., & Ryan, C. (2017). The use of community treatment orders in competent patients is not justified. British Journal of Psychiatry, 210, 311–312. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193920
O’Brien, A. J., & Kydd, R. (2013). Compulsory community care in New Zealand mental health legislation 1846–1992. SAGE Open. April-June. doi:10.1177/2158244013490175
Prebble, C. M. (2007). Ordinary men and uncommon women: A history of psychiatric nursing in New Zealand public mental hospitals, 1939-1972 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/1516
Rapp, C.A., & Goscha, R.J. (2012). The strengths model: A recovery orientated approach to mental health services (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Reed, K. (2006). The historical context of the blueprint for mental health services. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(1), 5–9. Retrieved from https://www.otnz.co.nz/public/publications/new-zealand-journal-of-occupational-therapy/
Saleeby, D. (1992). Biology’s challenge to social work: Embodying the person-in-environment perspective. Social Work, 37(2), 112–118. Retrieved from https://acadmeic.oup.com/sw
Stadnyk, R., Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend. (Eds.), Introduction to the art and science of living (2nd ed. pp 329-358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Strong, S., Rigby, P., Stewart, D., Law, M., Letts, L., & Cooper, B. (1999). Application of the person-environment-occupation model: A practical application. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(3), 122–133. doi:10.1177/000841749906600304
Synovec, C. (2015). Implementing recovery model principles as part of occupational therapy in inpatient settings. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(1), 50–61. doi:10.1080/0164212X,2014.1001014
Te Pou. (2014). Competencies for the mental health and addictions service user, consumer and peer workforce. Auckland, New Zealand: Author.
United Nations Human Rights Commission. (2015). Statement at the conclusion of its visit to New Zealand (24 March–7 April 2014) by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14563&LangID=E#sthash.wdQHxTCw.dpuf
Wilcock, A., & Townsend, E. (2000). Occupational terminology: Interactive dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science 7(2), 84–86. doi:10.1080/14427591.2000.9686470
Wilcock, A. (2006). An occupational perspective of health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.