Will prohibiting the use of physical punishment reduce child abuse deaths among New Zealand children?

Sophie Trevathan, Lynne Briggs

Abstract


The Amendment Act (Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act, 2007) came into force on 22 June 2007. The changes in the Act amended the right of parents to use force by way of correction toward a child. The purpose of this amendment was to provide children with a safer and more secure environment to live in that is free from violence. Such a move also has the potential to provide a clearer mandate for social workers in regard to issues of child safety. While planned, reviews to determine how effective the amendment has been have not yet been undertaken.

This paper presents some key findings from a larger study exploring the issue of child abuse deaths in New Zealand. In doing so a comparison of legislation and policy between New Zealand and Sweden is presented. Sweden was used as the main focus for this comparison as it introduced a ban on use of corporal punishment of children in 1979. 


Keywords


child abuse; correctional force; section 59 amendment; child abuse deaths; sweden;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benjet, C., & Kazdin, A.E. (2003). Spanking children: The controversies, findings and new directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(2), 197-224.

Bradford, S. (2005). Crimes (Abolition of Force as a Justification for Child Discipline) Amendment Bill 2005. Bills Digest No. 1278, Wellington: New Zealand Parliamentary Library.

Connolly, M. (2005). Fifteen years of Family Group Conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 523-540.

Dobbs, T. (2005) Children’s insights into family discipline. A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (Childhood and Youth Studies) of the University of Otago, Children’s Issues Centre, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Doolan, M. (2004). Child death by homicide: An examination of incidence in New Zealand 1991-2000. Te Awatea Review, 2(1), 7-10.

Durrant, J.E., & Olsen, G.M. (1997). Parenting and public policy. Contextualizing the Swedish corporal punishment ban. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19(4), 443-461.

Durrant, J.E. (2000). A generation without smacking: The impact of Sweden’s ban on physical punishment. London: Save the Children.

Durrant, J.E. (2004). Whose body is it anyway? Physical punishment, children’s rights and parental responsibility. Children Issues, 8(2), 23-26.

Gallaway, A. (1999). A submission seeking to repeal section 59 of the New Zealand Crimes Act 1961. Article Collection 2001: Family Issues. Children’s Issues Centre, University of Otago.

Khoo, E., Nygren, L., & Hyvonen, U. (2002). Child welfare or child protection. A comparative study of social intervention in child maltreatment in Canada and Sweden. In M. Hill, A. Stafford, & P.M. Lister (Eds.). International perspectives on child protection. Report of a seminar held on 20 March 2002. Glasgow: Centre for the Child and Society.

Kotch, J., Chalmers, D., Fanslow, J., Marshall, S., & Langley, J. (1993). Morbidity and death due to child abuse in New Zealand. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 233-247.

Lansdown, G. (2001). Children’s rights: A second chance. London: International Save the Children Alliance.

Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Sweden. (2005). Social Services Act: SFS 2001, Promulgated: 7 June, with amendments up to and including SFS 2004:851. Date of translation: March 2005. Sweden: Author.

Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Sweden. (2005). The Care of Young Persons Act: SFS 1990, Promulgated: 8 March 1990 with amendments up to and including SFS 2003:420. Date of translation: March 2005. Sweden: Author.

Ministry of Social Development. (2005). The Social Report 2005. Wellington: Author.

Ministry of Social Development. (2006). Children at increased risk of death from maltreatment and strategies for prevention. Wellington: Author.

Ministry of Youth Affairs. (2000). Children in New Zealand, United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child: Second Periodic Report of New Zealand, December 2000. Wellington: Author.

NZPA. (2007, February 22). Discipline Bill passes second reading. Otago Daily Times.

NZPA. (2007, May 3). Amendment clears way for Bill. Otago Daily Times.

NZPA. (2007, May 17). Big vote puts Smacking Bill into law. Otago Daily Times.

Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. (1981). Spare the rod. North Sydney: George Allen and Unwin Australia.

Ross, G. (2002). The physical chastisement of children: Lessons learned from Sweden and Germany. The Scottish Parliament: The Information Centre.

Tapp, P., & Taylor, N. (2002). Protecting the family. In M. Henaghan & B. Atkin (Eds.). Family law policy in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Wellington: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.

Taylor, N. (2004). International law. In A.B. Smith, M.M. Gollop, N.J. Taylor, & K.A. Marshall (Eds.). The discipline and guidance of children: Messages from research, a review of research literature for the Office of the Children’s Commissioner by the Children’s Issues Centre. Dunedin: University of Otago, Children’s Issues Centre, Commissioner for the Children.

The New Zealand Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act. (1989).

The New Zealand Crimes Act. (1961). Section 59.

The Amendment Act (The Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act, 2007)

Trevathan, S. (2007). Stopping the hurt: Laws prohibiting the use of physical punishment could reduce the rate of child abuse deaths amongst New Zealand children. (Unpublished Master of Social Work thesis), University of Otago, Dunedin.

UNICEF. (2008). The Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act - Media Kit. Retrieved on 31 August 2008 from http://www.unicef.org.nz/speaking-out/nz-children/April_2008_media_kit.pdf.

UNICEF. (2003). A league table of child maltreatment deaths in rich nations. Innocenti Report Card, Issue No.5, Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Retrieved June 18, 2005, from http://www.uniceficdc.org.

Wood, B. (2006). Article on repeal of Section 59 Crimes Act 1961. Retrieved 19 April 2006 from http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/subsec59.htm,.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol21iss1-2id309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.