Changing landscapes: Responding to domestic violence in New Zealand
Keywords:domestic violence, theory, practice models,
Domestic violence is not a recent phenomenon; rather it is one which has endured. To understand professional social work responses to domestic violence it is necessary to examine theories of causation since these inform ideas about intervention. How social work responds to domestic violence is context dependent. This article examines the causal explanations and contextual factors that have shaped New Zealand’s social work response to domestic violence. Suggestions are made for maximising a multifaceted, anti-discriminatory approach to practice.
Balzer, R., Haimona, D., Henare, M., & Matchitt, V. (1997). Maori family violence in Aotearoa. Wellington: Te Puni Kokiri.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1979). The social learning perspective: Mechanisms of aggression. In H. Toch (Ed.), Psychology of crime and criminal justice. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.
Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2007). Health disparities and violence against women: Why and how cultural and societal influences matter. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8, 90-104.
Blakely, T., Ajwani, S., Robson, B., Tobias, M., & Bonne, M. (2004). Decades of disparity: Widening ethnic mortality gaps from 1980 to 1999. 117 (1199). Retrieved from https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1199/995/.
Bograd, M. L. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. In K. Yllo & M. L. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11-26). Newbury Park. California: Sage Publications.
Buckingham, J. (2006). Patterns of violence in intimate relationships: A critical examination of legal responses. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Canterbury School of Law, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Coady, N., & Lehmann, P. (2008). Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice: A generalist-eclectic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Cribb, J., & Barnett, R. (1999). Being bashed: Western Samoan women’s responses to domestic violence in Western Samoa and New Zealand. Gender, Place and Culture, March, 49-65.
Crichton-Hill, Y. (2001). Challenging ethnocentric explanations of domestic violence: Let us decide, then value our decisions - a Samoan response. Trauma & Abuse: A Review Journal, 3(July), 203-214.
Cross, J., & Newbold, G. (2010). Presumptive arrest in partner assault: Use of discretion and problems of compliance in the New Zealand Police. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 51-75.
Dann, C. (1985). The Women’s Liberation Movement in New Zealand. A very brief summary of trends. Social Alternatives, 5(1), 24-25.
Durie, M. (2005). Te Tai Tini Transformations 2025 (CIGAD Working Paper Series 5/2005). Palmerston North: Centre for Indigenous Governance and Development.
Fisher, B. S., & Lab, S. P. (2010). Encyclopedia of victimology and crime prevention. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ford, G. (1993). A review of the 1987 police policy on domestic violence. Wellington: Policing Development Group.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men. How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
International Federation of Social Workers (2001). Definition of social work. Retrieved from http://www.ifsw.org/p38000279.html.
Knaggs, T., Leahy, F., Soboleva, N., & Ong, S. (2008). The Waitakere and Manukau Family Violence Courts: An evaluation summary. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
Lymbery, M., & Postle, K. (2007). Social work: a companion to learning. London: Sage Publications.
Macpherson, S. W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.
McPhail, B. A., Busch, N. B., Kulkarni, S., & Rice, G. (2007). An integrative feminist mode. The evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 817-841.
Merry, S. E. (2009). Gender violence: A cultural perspective. Chicester: Blackwell Publishing.
Committee of Inquiry into Violence (1987). Report of Ministerial Committee of Inquiry into Violence. Wellington: Department of Justice.
New Zealand. Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare., & Rangihau, J. T. R.-A. (1986). Puao-te-ata-tu = day break: The report of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori Perspective for the Department of Social Welfare. Wellington, N.Z.: The Committee.
Okitikpi, T., & Aymer, C. (2010). Key concepts in anti-discriminatory social work. London: Sage.
Okun, L. (1986). Women abuse: Facts replacing myths. New York: State University of New York Press.
Renfrew, J. W. (1997). Aggression and its causes: A biopsychosocial approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ricketts, D., & Childs, T. (1991). I’ve got to go now (recorded by Toni Childs). On House of Hope. A & M Records.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Communication between cultures. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.
Sewell, W. H. (2005). A theory of structure: duality, agency and transformation. In G. M. Spiegel (Ed.), Practicing history. New directions in historical writing after the linguistic turn. New York: Routledge.
Sheldon, B., & Macdonald, G. (2009). A textbook of social work. New York: Routledge.
Shardlow, S. M. (2007). The social policy context of practice learning. In J. Lishman (Ed.), Handbook for practice learning in social work and social care knowledge and theory. (pp. 13-26). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A., Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P. (2000). The intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse. A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 640-654.
The Ministry of Social Development (2002). Te Rito: New Zealand Family Violence Prevention Strategy. Wellington: The Ministry of Social Development.
Verrill, S. W. (2008). Social structure-social learning and delinquency: Mediation or moderation? New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
Walsh, J. (2006). Theories for direct social work practice. Belmont: Thomson Brookes/Cole.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.