Elder abuse and neglect: Past endeavours as a springboard for the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol20iss3id341Keywords:
elder abuse, older people, health social work, social work practice, historyAbstract
This paper traces the emergence of, and responses to, the phenomenon known as elder abuse and neglect in Aotearoa New Zealand and considers where to from here.References
Age Concern New Zealand. (1995). Elder abuse resource kit. Wellington: Author.
Age Concern New Zealand. (2004). Elder abuse and enduring power of attorney. Wellington: Author.
Age Concern New Zealand. (2005). Age Concern Elder Abuse and Neglect Prevention Services: An analysis of referrals for the period:1 July 2002 to 30 June 2004. Wellington, Author.
Age Concern New Zealand. (2006). Media Release: Age Concern New Zealand, 9 June 2006. Wellington: Author.
Age Concern New Zealand. (2007). Elder abuse and neglect prevention: Challenges for future. Wellington: Author.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Christchurch: Author.
Aitken, L., & Griffin, G. (1996). Gender and elder abuse. London: Sage.
Block, M. R., & Sinnot, J. D. (1979). The battered elder syndrome: An exploratory study. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Breckman, R. S., & Adelman, R. D. (1988). Strategies for helping victims of elder mistreatment. London: Sage Publications.
Burston, G. R. (1975). Granny-battering. British Medical Journal, 6, 592.
Bytheway, W. (1997). Talking about age: the theoretical basis of social gerontology. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (eds) Critical approaches to ageing and later life. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Decalmer, P., & Glendenning, F. (1993). The mistreatment of elderly people. London: Sage Publications.
Durie, M. (2001). Mauri ora: The dynamics of Māori health. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
Estes, C., Biggs, S., & Phillipson, C. (2003). Social theory, social policy and ageing: A critical introduction. London: Open University Press.
Fallon, P. (2006). Elder abuse and/or neglect literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development/Te Manatū Whakahiato Ora – Centre for Social Research and Evaluation.
Families Commission. (2008). Elder abuse and neglect: exploration of risk and protective factors. Wellington: Author.
Fleischmann, P. (2008). Elder abuse: An emerging crime. (Public presentation, NZ Police Forum) Christchurch, New Zealand.
Fuller, T. T., & O’Malley, T. A. (1987). Inadequate care of the elderly: A health care perspective on abuse and neglect. New York: Springer.
Harbison, J., & Morrow, M. (1998). Re-examining the social construction of ‘elder abuse and neglect’: A Canadian perspective. Ageing and Society, 18, 691-711.
Harbison, J. (1999). Models of intervention for elder abuse and neglect’: A Candian perspective on ageism, participation and empowerment. Journal of Abuse and Neglect, 10(3/4), 1-17.
Harris, G. (2006). Domestic violence and abuse: elder abuse. Practice Nurse, 31(8), 59-63.
Hickey, T., & Douglass, R. L. (1981). Mistreatment of the elderly in the domestic setting: An exploratory study. American Journal of Public Health, 71(5), 500-507.
Hightower. J., Smith, M. J., & Hightower, H. (2006). Hearing the voices of abused women. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 46(3/4), 205-227.
Kane, M. (2004). Ageism and intervention: What social work students believe about treating people differently because of age. Educational Gerontology, 30, 767-784.
Kane, M. (2006a). Social work students’ perceptions about incompetence in elders. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 47(3/4), 153-171.
Kane, M. (2006b). Ageism and gender among social work and criminal justice students. Educational Gerontology, 32, 859-880.
Kane, M. (2008a). When I’m 75 years old: Perceptions of social work students. Social Work in Health Care, 47(2), 185-213.
Kane, M. (2008b). Imaging recovery, resilience, and vulnerability at 75: Perceptions of social work students. Educational Gerontology, 34, 30-59.
McKendry, J. (2007). Elder abuse and neglect prevention: Challenges for the future. Wellington: Age Concern New Zealand.
McPhee, D. M., & Bronstein, L. (2002). Constructing meaning: Strengthening the policy-practice link. Social Work Education, 21(6), 651-662.
Maher, P. (2005). A study of social work practitioners and their needs when intervening in cases of elder abuse and neglect. (Unpublished Masters thesis). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Ministry of Health. (2002). Family violence intervention guidelines: Child and partner abuse. Wellington: Author.
Ministry of Health. (2007). Family violence intervention guidelines: Elder abuse and neglect. Wellington: Author.
Ministry of Social Policy. (2003). Positive ageing strategy. Wellington: Author.
Ministry of Social Development. (2002). Te Rito: New Zealand Family Violence Prevention Strategy. Wellington: Author.
Ministry of Social Development. (2006). The New Zealand positive ageing strategy: Progress report 2006. Wellington: Author.
Nahmiash, D. (2002). Powerlessness and abuse and neglect of older people. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 14(1), 21-47.
Ogg, J. (1993). Researching elder abuse in Britain. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 5(2), 37-53.
O’Malley, T. A., Everrett, D. E., O’Malley, H. C., & Campion, E. W. (1983). Identifying and preventing family mediated abuse and neglect of elderly persons. Annals of International Medicine, 98, 998-1005.
O’Malley, T. A., Segel, H. D., & Perez, R. (1979). Elder abuse in Massachusetts: A survey professionals and paraprofessionals. Massachusetts: Legal Research and Services for the Elderly.
Pain, R. (1997, March 1999). Theorising age in criminology: The case of home abuse. Paper presented at the British Criminology Conference, Belfast, Ireland.
Penhale, B. (1999). Elder abuse and older men: Towards an understanding. Paper presented at seminar: Men and violence against women, Strasbourg.
Peri, K., Fanslow, D. J., Hand, D. J., & Parsons, J. (2008). Elder abuse and neglect: Exploration of risk and protective factors. Wellington: Families Commission/Kōmihana ā whānau.
Pillemer, K. A., & Wolf, R. S. (1986). Elder abuse: Conflict in the family. Massachusetts: Auburn House Publishing Company.
Pritchard, J. (1999). Lessons learnt in working with elder abuse. In J. Pritchard (Ed.), Elder abuse work: Best practice in Britain and Canada (pp. 13-39). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Rathbone-McCuan, E. (1980). Elderly victims of family violence and neglect. Social Casework, 61(5), 296-304.
Roberts, J. (2008). The parameters of prejudice: Knowledge of ethics and age bias. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 50(3/4), 65-79.
Schiamberg, L., & Gans, D. (2000). Elder abuse by adult children: An applied ecological framework for understanding contextual risk factors and the intergenerational character of quality of life. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 50(4) 329-359.
Schofield, V. (2004). Elder abuse and neglect: Causes and consequences. Violence in Interpersonal Relationships, 80-95.
Stones, M.J. (1995). Porteé et definition des mauvias traitements et de la négligence a l’endroit des personnes agées au Canada, in MacLean (ed), Mauvais traitements aupres des personnes agées: strategies de changement. P 159-174. Montreal: Editions Saint-Martin.
Thompson, K. (2008, June 30). Minister alarmed at alleged gagging. The Press, p. A2. Christchurch: Fairfax New Zealand.
Victor, C. (2005). The social context of ageing: A textbook of gerontology. Oxen, UK: Routledge.
Wilson, G. (2002). Dilemmas and ethics: Social work practice in the detection and management of older women and men. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 14(1), 79-94.
World Health Organisation. (2002). Missing voices: Views of older persons on elder abuse. Geneva: WHO/INPEA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.