Making the connections: A practice model for reflective supervision
Keywords:Supervision, reflection, professional social work, social justice
INTRODUCTION: Over several decades, social work in Aotearoa New Zealand has undergone major alterations in service delivery in response to the management of risk and surveillance of practice within the neoliberal government agenda. Working in such an environment, social workers struggle to critically explore their position and professionally develop their practice. To support current professional practice in social work, reflective supervision has become a necessity for analysing and amplifying positive practice outcomes that benefit practitioners and service users.
METHOD: A four-layered practice model of reflective supervision has been developed by the researcher from a theoretical analysis of a study involving key informant and supervisory dyads. The purpose of the reflective supervision model is to support the agenda, task and process in the supervisory relationship towards critical reflection of practice.
FINDINGS: The four-layered practice model highlights the interrelationship between the social worker, the organisation, relationships with others, and the systemic contexts where practice occurs. The supervisee and supervisor have vital roles in order for reflection to occur in each supervision session.
CONCLUSIONS: Reflective supervision is seen as a co-constructed partnership between the supervisor and supervisee and the four-layered practice model assists in providing a structure for the session. The four-layered model supports critical thinking in the socio-political and socio-cultural environment, promotes social justice strategies and has versatility within a number of practice settings.
Adamowich, T., Kuwee Kumsa, M., Rego, C., Stoddart, J., & Vito, R. (2014). Playing hide-and-seek: Searching for the use of self in reflective social work practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15(2): 131–143. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.883312
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2008). ANZASW Code of ethics (2nd Rev.). Christchurch, NZ: Author.
Baines, D. (2017). Doing anti-oppressive practice. Social justice social work. Halifax, Canada: Fernwood.
Baines, D., & van den Broek, D. (2016). Coercive care: Control and coercion in the restructured care workplace. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 125-142. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw013
Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in “the risk society.” British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
Beddoe, L. (2011). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197–213. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2011.591187
Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision. Current themes and models for practice. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Beddoe, L., Davys, A., & Adamson, C. (2014). “Never trust anybody who says ‘I don’t need supervision’”: Practitioners’ beliefs about social worker resilience. Practice, 26(2), 113–130. doi:10.1080/09503153.2014.896888
Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M.-s. (2015). Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568–1586. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv110
Beddoe, L., & Maidment, J. (2009). Mapping knowledge for social work practice: Critical intersections. Melbourne, VIC: Cengage.
Bond, M., & Holland, S. (2010). Skills of clinical supervision for nurses: A practical guide for supervisees, clinical supervisors and managers (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Bradley, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Höjer, S. (2010). Supervision: A force for change? Three stories told. International Social Work, 53(6), 773–790. doi:10.1177/0020872809358401
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Carroll, M. (2010). Supervision: Critical reflection for transformational learning (Part 2). The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/07325221003730301
Davys, A. (2007). Making the most of supervision: A supervisee’s guide. In D. Wepa (Ed.), Clinical supervision in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A health perspective (pp. 26–42). Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education.
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Elliott, H., Ryan, J., & Hollway, W. (2012). Research encounters, reflexivity and supervision. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(5), 433–444. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.610157
Engelbrecht, L. K. (2010). A strengths perspective on supervision of social workers: An alternative management paradigm within a social development context. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 14(1), 47–58, doi:10.1921/095352210X505490
Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time. Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferguson, H. (2011). Child protection practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Gray, M., & Webb, S. (Eds.). (2013). The new politics of social work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hair, H. (2014). Power relations in supervision: Preferred practices according to social workers. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 95(2), 107–114.
Hair, H. (2015). Supervision conversations about social justice and social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 349–370. doi:10.1177/1468017314539082
Hair, H., & O’Donoghue, K. (2009). Culturally relevant, socially just social work supervision: Becoming visible through a social constructionist lens. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18(1–2), 70–88. doi:10.1080/15313200902874979
Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2012). Supervision in the helping professions (4th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Hernández, P., & McDowell, T. (2010). Intersectionality, power, and relational safety in context: Key concepts in clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 29–35. doi:10.1037/a0017064
Johnston, L., Noble, C., & Gray, M. (2016). Critical supervision for the human services: A social model to promote learning and value-based practice. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. (2004). Social work supervision contributing to innovative knowledge production and open expertise. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social work, critical reflection and the learning organisation (pp. 23–39). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. USA: Prentice Hall.
Munford, R., & Walsh-Tapiata, W. (2006). Community development: Working in the bicultural context of Aotearoa New Zealand. Community Development Journal, 41(4), 426–442. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsl025
O’Donoghue, K. (2003). Restorying social work supervision. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
O’Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. doi:10.1080/17525098.2015.1039172
Rankine, M. (2017). What are we thinking? Supervision as the vehicle for reflective practice in community-based child welfare services. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Auckland, NZ.
Saltiel, D. (2016). Supervision: A contested space for learning and decision making. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 533–549. doi:1473325016633445
Social Workers Registration Board. (2016). Code of conduct. Retrieved from http://swrb.govt.nz/concerns-and-information/code-of-conduct/
Tsui, M.-S. (2005). Social work supervision: Contexts and concepts. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Tsui, M.-S., O’Donoghue, K., & Ng, A. K. T. (2014). Culturally competent and diversity-sensitive clinical supervision. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 238–254). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Vito, R. (2015). Leadership support of supervision in social work practice: Challenges and enablers to achieving success. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne de Service Social, 32(1–2), 151–165. doi:10.7202/1034148ar
Weld, N. (2012). A practical guide to transformative supervision for the helping professions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
Westergaard, J. (2013). Line management supervision in the helping professions: Moving from external supervision to a line manager supervisor model. The Clinical Supervisor, 32(2), 167–184. doi:10.1080/07325223.2013.846756
Wilkins, D., Forrester, D., & Grant, L. (2016). What happens in child and family social work supervision? Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12314
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.