Social work perceptions and identity: How social workers perceive public and professional attitudes towards their vocation and discipline
Keywords:Statutory Social Work, Identity, Registration, Multi-disciplinary Teams, Public Perceptions
INTRODUCTION: A century after Abraham Flexner’s (1915/2001) infamous speech conveyed his “dismissive attitude toward social work’s professionalism,” Gelman and González (2016) reflected that social work is again at a critical juncture. The fight for recognition of social work’s professional status has been influenced by multiple factors including negative public perceptions of the occupation. In Aotearoa New Zealand, professionalisation campaigns have been far from unifying, with diverse ideas about practice standards and accountability polarising opinions. At a time that the country is grappling with mandatory registration of social workers, this research considers the ways in which social workers perceive themselves, and the profession that they identify with.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 83 social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand were conducted. Participants were required to be eligible for social work registration. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
FINDINGS: Several identity themes emerged during the analysis of the 83 interviews. The first theme relates to the ways in which statutory child protection social work has impacted on identity. The second, and perhaps predictable theme, is that many social workers in this study experienced significant professional marginalisation from their colleagues. The third theme emerged from participants’ views about the likelihood of mandatory registration of social workers impacting on their identity and the professional standing of social work.
CONCLUSION: Most participants in the current study believed that mandatory social worker registration may positively influence the public’s view of social workers, other professionals, and also social workers themselves. However, many participants seemed to experience levels of self-stigma – and potentially believe they are viewed more negatively by the public than they actually are. Social workers’ perceptions of their role and profession is an area that warrants further investigation.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2013). Code of ethics. Dunedin, New Zealand: Author.
Beddoe, L. (2015). Continuing education, registration and professional identity in New Zealand social work. International Social Work, 58(1), 165–174. doi:10.1177/0020872812473139
Barretta-Herman, A. (1993). Development of social work in New Zealand: 1969–1988. Part II: Social work professionalism. Social Work Review, 5(5), 30–35.
Booker, C. (2009). “Evil destruction” of a happy family. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/
Condie, C. D., Hanson, J. A., Lang, N. E., Moss, D. K., & Kane, R. A. (1978). How the public views social work. Social Work, 23(1), 47–53.
Connolly, M., de Haan, I., & Crawford, J. (2014). Focus on stability: A cohort of young children in statutory care in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 60(1), 111–125. doi:10.1177/0020872814554855
Connolly, M., & Doolan, M. (2007). Responding to the deaths of children known to child protection agencies. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 30, 1–11.
Davidson, S., & King, S. (2005). Public knowledge of and attitudes to social work in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive Social Research.
Dennison, S. T., Poole, J., & Qaquish, B. (2007). Students’ perceptions of social work: Implications for strengthening the image of social work among college students. Social Work, 52(4), 350–360.
Flexner, A. (1915/2001). Is social work a profession? Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 152–165. doi:10.1177/104973150101100202
Gelman, C. R., & González, M. J. (2016). Reconsidering social work 100 years post-Flexner: Where are we now, where are we headed, what has been gained, what has been lost? Journal of Social Work Education, 52(sup1), S1–S5. doi:10.1080/10437797.2016.1192932
Harington, P. (2006). Practitioner scholarship and civic literacy: Will registration lift the game? Social Work Review, 18, 90–99.
Hunt, S. (2016). The social work professionalization project before the 1990s in Aotearoa New Zealand: The dream. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(3), 15–25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss3id245
Hunt, S. (2017). The social work regulation project in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 53–64. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id370
International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/
Jordan, B. (2004). Emancipatory social work? Opportunity or oxymoron. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 5–19.
Kadushin, A. (1958). Prestige of social work—Facts and factors. Social Work, 3(2), 37–43.
LeCroy, C. W., & Stinson, E. L. (2004). The public’s perception of social work: Is it what we think it is? Social Work, 49(2), 164–174. doi:10.1093/sw/49.2.164
Leigh, J. (2016). The story of the PPO queen: The development and acceptance of a spoiled identity in child protection social work. Child & Family Social Work, 21(4), 412–420. doi:10.1111/cfs.12157
Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative research methods (4th ed.). Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Logie, J. (2017, Aug 17). Social Workers Registration Legislation Bill – First Reading. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20170817_20170817_32
Nash, M. (2009). Histories of the social work profession. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work. Context and practice (2nd ed., pp. 363–377). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2011). Omnibus survey. Unpublished.
Social Workers Registration Board. (2016). Code of conduct and practice. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
Staniforth, B., Deane, K. L., & Beddoe, L. (2016). Comparing public perceptions of social work and social workers' expectations of the public view. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(1), 13–24.
Staniforth, B., Fouché, C., & Beddoe, L. (2014). Public perception of social work and social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(2/3), 48–60.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
van Heugten, K. (2011). Registration and social work education: A golden opportunity or a Trojan horse? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 174–190. doi:10.1177/1468017310386695
Zugazaga, C. B., Surette, R. B., Mendez, M., & Otto, C. W. (2006). Social worker perceptions of the portrayal of the profession in the news and entertainment media: An exploratory study. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 621–636.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.