Five years in the news: A media analysis of Child, Youth and Family in two daily newspapers (2008–2012)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss4id382Keywords:
social work, social workers, news media, media analysis, Child Youth and Family.Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This article describes a subset of data relating to the term “Child Youth and Family” from a media analysis of two major Aotearoa New Zealand newspapers from 2008 to 2012 and reports on the major themes emerging from a qualitative analysis of these articles.
METHODS: A search was conducted within the online versions of the New Zealand Herald and the Otago Daily Times for the years 2008 to 2012 on the search terms: “social work,” “social worker” and “child youth and family.” A qualitative thematic analysis of 1,512 articles within the data set “child youth and family” was conducted.
FINDINGS: Child Youth and Family (CYF) content overwhelmingly made up the largest sub-set of the data and within that subset, the reporting was principally related to crime and abuse. Social workers were seen mainly as receivers of referrals and of removing children and placing them in “care.” There was little mention of intervention or treatment. There were many reports of the ways things went badly in the process, and at those times social workers were reportedly at the forefront.
CONCLUSION: The CYF content presents a limited view of social work, with potential implications for the scope of social work practice being limited to removal of children, and a reduction in the acknowledgement of the wider scope of treatment and intervention. There is also an emphasis on criticism of social workers when children are the victims of violence that occurs within a wider socio-political context.
References
Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2013). The utility of positioning theory to the study of ageing: Examples from research with childless older people. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(2), 175–187.
Beddoe, L., & Cree, V. E. (2017). The risk paradigm and the media in child protection. In M. Connolly (Ed.), Beyond the risk paradigm in child protection (pp. 15–28). London, UK: Macmillan Education.
Beddoe, L., Staniforth, B.L., & Fouché, C. (2017). “Proud of what I do but often I would be happier to say I drive trucks”: Ambiguity in social workers’ self-perception. Qualitative Social Work, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1473325017725801
Blank, A. (1999). Māori, the media, racism and neglect. Social Work Now, 14, 41–45.
Blomberg, H. (2017). “We’re not magicians! On the use of rhetorical resources in Swedish news media narratives portraying the social services and social workers. Qualitative Social Work, 1-18. doi:10.1177/1473325017710324
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Briar-Lawson, K., Martinson, K., Briar-Bonpane, J., & Zox, K. (2011). Child welfare, the media, and capacity building. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5, 185–199.
Chenot, D. (2011). The vicious cycle: Recurrent interactions among the media, politicians, the public, and child welfare services organizations. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(2–3), 167–184. doi:10.1080/15548732.2011.566752
Davenport, J. A., & Davenport, J. (1997). Social workers: Fad chasing jackasses or still on the side of the angels. The New Social Worker, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.socialworker.com/media.htm
Davidson, S., & King, S. (2005). Public knowledge of and attitudes to social work in Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Executive Social Research.
Franklin, B., & Parton, N. (Eds.). (1991). Social work, the media and public relations. London, England: Routledge.
Garrett, P. M. (2009). The case of “Baby P”: Opening up spaces for debate on the “transformation” of Children's Services? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 533–547.
Gaughan, L., & Garrett, P. M. (2012). The ‘most twisted and unaccountable force in the state’? Newspaper accounts of social work in the Republic of Ireland in troubled times. Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 267-286. doi:10.1177/1468017310383269
Geoff Pearman Partners in Change. (2011). Scoping report “The Learning Exchange.” Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. Auckland, NZ: Author.
Hyslop, I. (2013). The “White paper for vulnerable children” and the “Munro review of child protection in England”: A comparative critique. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(4), 4–14.
Hyslop, I. (2016). Social work in the teeth of a gale: A resilient counter-discourse in neoliberal times. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4(1), 21–37. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14519919041316
Hyslop, I. (2017, April 7). Grave concerns over new ministry. Newsroom. Retrieved from https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/04/07/17562/smoke-mirrors-and-vulnerable-children
Lytollis, S. (1996). Making the best of the media spotlight. Social Work Now, (5), 15–20.
Merchant, R. (2012). Reframing child abuse: Changing media and public perceptions of the perpetrators of physical child abuse. Probing the boundaries. Retrieved from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/probing-the-boundaries/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/merchantpunpaper.pdf
Ministry of Social Development. (2015). Expert Panel final report: Investing in New Zealand’s children and their families. Wellington, NZ: Author.
Ministry of Vulnerable Children Oranga Tamariki. (2017). About us. Retrieved from https://www.mvcot.govt.nz/about-us/who-we-are/
Modernising Child, Youth and Family Expert Panel. (2015). Modernising Child, Youth and Family Expert Panel: Interim report. Wellington, NZ:
Ministry of Social Development. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/cyf-modernisation/interim-report-expert-panel.pdf
Nairn, R. G. (2007). Media portrayals of mental illness, or is it madness? A review. Australian Psychologist, 42(2), 138–146.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London UK: Sage.
Provan, S. E. (2012). The uncanny place of the bad mother and the innocent child at the heart of New Zealand’s “cultural identity” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7393
Re-Imagining Social Work Collective. (2017). Who defines social work? In defence of the Global Definition. [Blog-post]. Retrieved from http://www.reimaginingsocialwork.nz/2017/05/rsw-collectives-submission-on-the-draft-swrb-defintion-of-social-work/
Stanfield, D., & Beddoe, L. (2016). Social work and social media in Aotearoa New Zealand: Educating social workers across shifting boundaries of social work identity. Social Work Education, 35(3), 284–296. doi:10.1080/02615479.2016.1154663
Staniforth, B. (2016, August 3). “Vulnerable” label harmful step for child service. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11686047
Staniforth, B., Deane, K. L., & Beddoe, L. (2016). Comparing public perceptions of social work and social workers’ expectations of the public view. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(1), 13–24.
Staniforth, B., Fouché, C. B., & Beddoe, L. (2014). Public perception of social work and social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 26(2/3), 48–60.
Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
Zivkovic, T., Warin, M., Davies, M., & Moore, V. (2010). In the name of the child: The gendered politics of childhood obesity. Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 375–392. doi:10.1177/1440783310384456
Zugazaga, C. B., Surette, R. B., Mendez, M., & Otto, C. W. (2006). Social worker perceptions of the portrayal of the profession in the news and entertainment media: An exploratory study. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 621–636.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
