A matter of degrees: The role of education in the professionalisation journey of social work in New Zealand
Keywords:social work practice, social work education, professionalisation, Social Work Registration Act 2003, social work qualification,
AbstractSocial work in Aotearoa New Zealand (ANZ) is a contested profession on a journey of professionalisation in an era where contradictory forces impact on its position and strength. Social work education reflects these tensions, being influenced by economic and political forces. The delineation of a benchmark qualification for entry is a core feature of professional status and so the inception of professionalregistration has impacted on social work education in ANZ as it has elsewhere. The aim of this paper is to explore dimensions of the history of social work education in ANZ, the impact of the Social Workers Registration Act (2003) (SWRA) and to examine some current constraints and consider the challenges professional education faces in the next 50 years. It is argued that social work education has been, is and will remain a site of struggle.
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2000). Position paper on the statutory registration of social workers. Dunedin, New Zealand: ANZASW.
Avis, J. (1995). The validation of learner experience: A conservative practice? Studies in the Education of Adults, 27(2), 173-186.
Beddoe, L. (2007). Change, complexity and challenge in social work education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian Social Work, 60(1), 46-55.
Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work, 41(3), 557-575.
Beddoe, L. (2013a). Continuing education, registration and professional identity in New Zealand social work. International Social Work. doi:10.1177/0020872812473139.
Beddoe, L. (2013b). A ‘profession of faith’ or a profession: Social work, knowledge and professional capital. NewZealand Sociology, 28(2), 44-63.
Beddoe, L. (2013c). Health social work: Professional identity and knowledge. Qualitative Social Work, 12(1), 24-40.
Beddoe, L., & Deeney, C. (2012). Discovering health social work in New Zealand in its published work: Implications for the profession. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 24(1), 41-55.
Beddoe, L., & Duke, J. (2009). Registration in New Zealand social work: The challenge of change. International Social Work, 52(6), 785-797.
Beddoe , L., & Randal, H. (1994). NZASW and the professional response to a decade of challenge. In R. Munford & M. Nash (Eds.), Social work in action (pp. 21-36). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
Brown, M. (2000). Care and protection is about adult behaviour: The Ministerial Review of the Department of Child, Youth and Family Services. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/archive/2000-care-and-protection-is-about-adult-behaviour.pdf.
Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Re-visioning social work education: An independent review. London.
Daniels, K. (1973). Social work education: A time of crisis. The New Zealand Social Worker: News and Opinions, 9(4), 43-55.
Gieryn, T.F. (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6), 781–795.
Green, L. C. (2006). Pariah profession, debased discipline? An analysis of social work’s low academic status and the possibilities for change. Social Work Education, 25(3), 245-264.
Harington, P.R., & Beddoe, L. (2013). Civic practice: A new professional paradigm for social work. Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 147-164.
Harington, P.R., & Crothers, C. (2005). The social work occupational category: The 2001 census data. Social Work Review, 18(4), 3-14.
Heite, C. (2012). Setting and crossing boundaries: Professionalization of social work and social work professionalism. Social Work and Society, 10(2), 1-14.
Mattinson, A. (1951). Social work in obstetrics. New Zealand Nursing Journal, 44(6), 171-173.
McLaughlin, K. (2007). Regulation and risk in social work: The General Social Care Council and the Social Care Register in context. British Journal of Social Work, 37(7), 1263-1277.
Ministry of Social Policy (2000). The registration of social workers: Discussion paper. Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/archive/2000-reg_socwork_discpaper.pdf.
Ministry of Social Policy (2001). Consultation reportsummary: The registration of social workers. Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/archive/2001-reg_socwork_consultationsummary.pdf.
Narey, M. (2014). Making the education of social workers consistently effective: Report of Sir Martin Narey’s independent review of the education of children’s social workers. London: Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/making-the-education-of-social-workers-consistently-effective.
Nash, M. (1997). Who drives social work education in New Zealand? Social Work Review, 9(4), 14-19.
Nash, M. (1998). People, policies and practice: Social work education in New Zealand 1949-1995. PhD thesis. Palmerston North: Massey University.
Nash, M. (2001). Educating social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. In M. Connolly (Ed.), New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 265-290). Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Nash, M. (2009). Histories of the social work profession. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (2nd ed., pp. 363-377). Melbourne: Oxford.
Nash, M., & Munford, R. (2001). Unresolved struggles: Educating social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Social Work Education, 20(1), 21-34.
New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (undated). http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/studying-in-new-zealand/nzqf/understand-nz-quals/bachelor-s-degree/.
O’Brien, M. (2005). A just profession or just a profession? Social Work Review, 17(1), 13-22.
Olgiati, V.(2006). Shifting heuristics in the sociological approach to professional trustworthiness: The sociology of science. Current Sociology, 54(4), 533-547.
Randal, H. (1997). Competent practice and its regulation - Debating the issues around the registration and professionalisation of social work in New Zealand. Social Work Review, 9(1/2), 16-19.
Ritchie, J.E. (1967).The relation of the university to the profession of social work. The New Zealand Social Worker: News and Opinions, 3(2) pp. 3-13.
Robb, J. H. (1959). Similarities and differences in social work education as seen from New Zealand. International Social Work, 2(1), 11-14.
Rochford, M. W., & Robb, M. J. (1981). People in the social services. Wellington: New Zealand Social Work Training Council.
Shirley, I. (1997). Educating social workers in a changing cultural context: ANew Zealand perspective. Social Work Review, 9(4), 12-13.
Social Workers Registration Act (2003). Wellington: New Zealand Government.
Social Workers Registration Board (2012). Social Work Programme Recognition Standards Review: Consultation Summary. Wellington: SWRB.
Social Workers Registration Board (2013). The process for recognition and re-recognition of social work qualifications in New Zealand. Retrieved from SWRB. http://www.swrb.govt.nz/policy.
Social Workers Registration Board (2014). Schedule ofrecognised New Zealand social work qualifications (January 2014). Wellington: SWRB Retrieved from http://www.swrb.govt.nz/new-applicants/recognised-qualifications.
Spensley, R. G. (1953). The nurse as a medical social worker. New Zealand Nursing Journal, 46(6), 177.
van Heugten, K. (2011). Registration and social work education: A golden opportunity or a Trojan horse? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 174-190.
Wilson, G., & Campbell, A. (2012). Developing social work education: Academic perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 1005-1023.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.