Blinded by science: The social implications of epigenetics and neuroscience
AbstractBook review by Liz Beddoe.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage.
Beddoe, L. (2017, January 4). Brains, biology and tests for future burdenhood [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.reimaginingsocialwork.nz/2017/01/brains-biology-and-tests-for-future-burdenhood-misguided-blind-faith-in-science/
Crossley, S. (2015). Realising the (troubled) family: Crafting the neoliberal state. Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(2), 263–279. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204674315X14326465757666
Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2013). A marriage made in hell: Early intervention meets child protection. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct052
Khan, F. (2010). Preserving human potential as freedom: A framework for regulating epigenetic harms. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 20(2), 259–323.
McKendrick, D. (2016). Crafting the society of control: Exploring Scottish child welfare policy in a neoliberal context. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(3), 37–46. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss3id242
Wastell, D., White, S., & Lorek, A. (2013). The child’s timeframe: A neuro scientific perspective. London UK: 14 Gray's Inn Square
White, S., & Wastell, D. (2015). The rise and rise of prevention science in UK family welfare: Surveillance gets under the skin. Families, Relationships and Societies.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.