Māori social workers’ experiences of care and protection: A selection of findings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol26iss1id55Keywords:
m?ori social work practice, child protection, family group conferencing, wh?nau ora,Abstract
This article explores the challenges faced by seven Māori social workers who are also members of Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) working within the child protection system in Aotearoa. Their views on what has improved for Māori whānau around recent legislation changes to family group conferencing (FGC) and newer policy initiatives such as Whānau Ora are examined. The study used a Māori-centred research approach and a thematic analysis of participants’ accounts was undertaken. From this analysis it was found that: (a) the participants walked creatively between two world views in order to best meet the needs of their own people; (b) these Māori practitioners felt over-worked and under-valued; and (c) the participants viewed the practices within FGCs as biased, demonstrating a lack of bicultural ability and contributing to significant barriers that whānau Māori experience in care and protection.References
Bennett, B., & Zubrzycki, J. (2003). Hearing the stories of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social workers: Challenging and educating the system. Australian Social Work, 56(1), 1-78.
Blackstock, C., & Trocme, N. (2005). Community-based child welfare for Aboriginal children: Supporting resilience through structural change. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 24(1), 12-33.
Carr, J., & Peters, M. (1997). Assessment of multi-disciplinary child protective teams in five Western Washington communities: Chehalis, Nisqually, Shoalwater Bay, Skokomish, Squaxin Island. (Unpublished MPA thesis). Evergreen State College, Washington, United States.
Connolly, M. (2006). Fifteen years of family group conferencing: Coordinators talk about their experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 523-540.
Crengle, S., Lay-Yee R., Davis, P., & Pearson, J. (2006). Comparison of Māori and non-Māori patient visits to doctors. National Primary Medical Care Survey, Report 6. Retrieved from: http://www.moh.govt.nz/notebook/nbbooks.nsf/0/D222772D6D01D0FACC25748C007D64D8/$file/NatMedCaReport6Dec2005.pdf.
Durst, D. (1998). The wellness of Canadian first nations children: Seeking solutions through self government. Unpublished draft research paper. Retrieved from http://www.snaicc.org.au/_uploads/rsfil/02785.pdf.
Eruera, M. (2005). He Korero Korari. Supervision for Māori: Weaving the past, into the present for the future. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, Palmerston North.
Hollis, A. (2006). Pūao-te-ata-tū and Māori social work methods. (Unpublished Masters thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Hollis-English, A. (2012). Māori social workers: Experiences within social service organisations. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Human Rights Commission. (2012). Inquiry into the determinants of wellbeing for Māori children. Submission to the Māori Affairs Select Committee. Retrieved from: http://www.hrc.co.nz/2012/Māori-children-denied-basic-human-rights.
Jackson, M. (1988). Māori and the criminal justice system: He Whaipaanga Hou: A new perspective (Parts I & II). Wellington: Department of Justice.
Jansen, P., & Jansen, D. (2011). Māori and health. In Cole’s Medical Practice in New Zealand, pp.48-60 (p.53). Retrieved from: http://www.mcnz.org.nz/assets/News-and Publications/Coles/Chapter-5.pdf.
Kuni-Shepherd, O. (1997). The policy and practice of recording iwi affiliation. Social Work Now, 6, 12-16. Retrieved from: http://www.cyf.govt.nz/about-us/publications/social-work-now.html.
Libesman, T. (2004). Child welfare approaches for Indigenous communities: International perspectives. National Child Protection Clearing House, 20, 1-39. Retrieved from: www.aifs.gov.au/nch/pubs/issues/issues20/issues20.html.
Love, C. (2000). Family group conferencing: Cultural origins, sharing and appropriation – a Māori reflection. In G. Burford, & J. Hudson (Eds). Family group conferencing: New directions in child and family practice. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Love, C. (2002). Māori perspectives on collaboration and colonisation in contemporary Aotearoa/New Zealand child and family welfare policies and practices. Partnerships for Children and Families Project. Wilfred Laurier University, Ontario, Canada.
Maxwell, G. & Pakura, S. (2006). The Family Group Conference: Does it work for child protection? Presentation for the study tour: A Restorative Justice System for Juveniles: Information for Mexico from New Zealand. Retrieved from: http://igps.victoria.ac.nz/events/completed-activities/RJ%20Mexico/CareProtFGC.pdf.
Ministry of Social Development. (2010). The statistical report. Retrieved from: http://statistical-report-2010.msd. govt.nz/.
Moyle, P. (1998). Walking the talk: A record of Crawford whakapapa and selected stories from Ngati Porou. (Unpublished Research Report). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
New Zealand Council of Christian Social Services. (2010). Grassroots voices: The voice of New Zealand families and communities. Retrieved from: http://www.justiceandcompassion.org.nz/site/home.php.
O’Donoghue, K. (2010). Towards the construction of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand: A study of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, Palmerston North.
Pakura, S. (2005). Thefamily group conference 14-year journey: Celebrating the successes, learning the lessons, embracing the challenges. Paper presented at the American Humane Association’s Family Group Decision Making Conference and Skills-Building Institute, 6-9 June 2004, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA. Retrieved from: http://www.iirp.edu/pdf/au05_pakura.pdf.
Reid, P., Robson, B., & Jones, C. P. (2000). Disparities in health: common myths and uncommon truths. Pacific Health Dialog, 7(1), 38-47.
Rimene, S. (1994). The Children Young Persons and their Families Act 1989: From a Māori perspective. Unpublished master’s thesis. Victoria University of Wellington. Wellington, New Zealand.
Stanley, T. (2007). Risky work: Child protection practice. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand Te Puna Whakaaro. Retrieved from: http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/index.html.
Tauri, J. (1999). Family Group Conferencing: The myth of Indigenous empowerment in New Zealand. Retrieved from: www.usask.ca/nativelaw/publications/jah/.../Fam_Grp_Conf_NZ.pdf.
Tauri, J. (2010). Indigenous perspectives and experiences: Māori and the criminal justice system. Retrieved from: http://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Tauri%20chapter%20on%20Māori%20the%20CJS.pdf.
Tauri, J. (2012). The indigenous criminologist. Retrieved from: http://juantauri.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/media-politics-and-darkies-behaving.html.
Weaver, H. (1998). Indigenous people in a multicultural society: Unique issues for human services. Social Work, 43(3), 203-211.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
