Does the consensus about the value of supervision in social work stifle research and innovation?

Liz Beddoe, David Wilkins

Abstract


Editorial

Keywords


supervision;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ballantyne, N., Beddoe, L., Hay, K., Maidment, J., Walker, S., & Mayhew, Z. (2019). Enhancing the readiness to practise of newly qualified social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand (Enhance R2P)—Report on phase two: The readiness to practise of NQSWs. Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa.

Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M. (2016). Towards an international consensus for a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568–1586.

Beddoe, K. (2017). Harmful supervision: A commentary. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(1), 88–101.

Blom B., Evertsson, L., & Perlinski. M. (2017). (Eds.), Social and caring professions in European welfare states. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Carpenter, J., Webb, C., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services, 35(11), 1843–1853.

Ellis, M. V., Creaner, M., Hutman, H., & Timulak, L. (2015). A comparative study of clinical supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 621–631. doi:10.1037/cou0000110.

Hardy, R. (2015, March 17). The social worker who changed my life. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www. theguardian.com/social-care-network/2015/mar/17/the- social-worker-who-changed-my-life.

Hay, K., Maidment, J., Ballantyne, N., Beddoe, L., & Walker, S. (2019). Feeling lucky: The serendipitous nature of field education. Clinical Social Work Journal, 47(1), 23–31. doi:10.1007/s10615-018-0688-z.

Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Beddoe, L., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M.s. (2017). Professional supervision and professional autonomy. In B. Blom, L. Evertsson, & M. Perlinski (Eds.), Social and caring professions in European welfare states (pp. 53-66). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Maben, J., Taylor, C., Dawson, J., Leamy, M., McCarthy, I., & Reynolds, E., ... Foot, C. (2018). A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds in England. Health Service Delivery Research, 6(37). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK533087/.

Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2015). Content and purpose of supervision in social work practice in England: Views of newly qualified social workers, managers and directors. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 52–68.

Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. J., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83(1), 3–32. doi:10.1086/599028.

O’Donoghue, K., Wong Yuh Ju, P., & Tsui, M. (2018). Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358.

Sewell, K. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265.

Turner-Daly, B., & Gordon, J. (2017). Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: The experiences of a group of child care social workers in England. Child and Family Social Work, 22(1), 36–46.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.