Does the consensus about the value of supervision in social work stifle research and innovation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id643Keywords:
supervision,Abstract
EditorialReferences
Ballantyne, N., Beddoe, L., Hay, K., Maidment, J., Walker, S., & Mayhew, Z. (2019). Enhancing the readiness to practise of newly qualified social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand (Enhance R2P)—Report on phase two: The readiness to practise of NQSWs. Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa.
Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M. (2016). Towards an international consensus for a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568–1586.
Beddoe, K. (2017). Harmful supervision: A commentary. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(1), 88–101.
Blom B., Evertsson, L., & Perlinski. M. (2017). (Eds.), Social and caring professions in European welfare states. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Carpenter, J., Webb, C., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services, 35(11), 1843–1853.
Ellis, M. V., Creaner, M., Hutman, H., & Timulak, L. (2015). A comparative study of clinical supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 621–631. doi:10.1037/cou0000110.
Hardy, R. (2015, March 17). The social worker who changed my life. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www. theguardian.com/social-care-network/2015/mar/17/the- social-worker-who-changed-my-life.
Hay, K., Maidment, J., Ballantyne, N., Beddoe, L., & Walker, S. (2019). Feeling lucky: The serendipitous nature of field education. Clinical Social Work Journal, 47(1), 23–31. doi:10.1007/s10615-018-0688-z.
Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Beddoe, L., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M.s. (2017). Professional supervision and professional autonomy. In B. Blom, L. Evertsson, & M. Perlinski (Eds.), Social and caring professions in European welfare states (pp. 53-66). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Maben, J., Taylor, C., Dawson, J., Leamy, M., McCarthy, I., & Reynolds, E., ... Foot, C. (2018). A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds in England. Health Service Delivery Research, 6(37). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK533087/.
Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2015). Content and purpose of supervision in social work practice in England: Views of newly qualified social workers, managers and directors. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 52–68.
Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. J., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83(1), 3–32. doi:10.1086/599028.
O’Donoghue, K., Wong Yuh Ju, P., & Tsui, M. (2018). Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358.
Sewell, K. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265.
Turner-Daly, B., & Gordon, J. (2017). Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: The experiences of a group of child care social workers in England. Child and Family Social Work, 22(1), 36–46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
