The internal/external debate: The tensions within social work supervision

Authors

  • Matt Rankine University of Auckland New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id646

Keywords:

Supervision, external supervision, social work, reflection, professional practice

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Supervision is crucial to social workers’ practice. Within the current managerial social services environment, the supervisor juggles organisational and professional accountabilities—organisational agendas often dominate practitioners’ reflection. In response, alternative types of supervision have emerged, one of which is external supervision.

METHODS: This paper analyses qualitative discussions with key informants and supervisory dyads in community-based child welfare services regarding reflective practices in supervision. Internal and external supervision arrangements were discussed in depth relative to their impact on social work practice.

FINDINGS: Analysis of discussions identified four themes: the significance of external supervision for building capacity, resilience and confidential reflective space; the role of internal supervision for managerial and organisational agendas; tensions associated with external supervision regarding funding and accountability; and important attributes of the supervisor in successful working relationships.

CONCLUSIONS: External supervision is essential for professional competence but considerable inter-organisational variation exists in how this is utilised. Three key considerations emerged: accountabilities of external supervisor, supervisee and internal supervisor towards collaborative practice, evaluation and feedback; purchasing of external supervision; and the professional development of external supervisors. Further education connecting the importance of the supervisory relationship to realise critical thinking and practice development is essential for the future of social work.

References

Adamson, C. (2011). Supervision is not politically innocent. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 185–196. doi:10.1080/031 2407x.2011.618544

Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2015). Supervision Policy. Retrieved from https://anzasw.nz/wp-content/uploads/ANZASW- Supervision-Policy-Updated-February- 2015.pdf

Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW). (2018). Supervisors listing. Retrieved from https://anzasw.nz/supervisors-listing/

Baglow, L. (2009). Social work supervision and its role in enabling a community visitor program that promotes and protects the rights of children. Australian Social Work, 62(3), 353–368. doi:10.1080/03124070902964632

Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in “the risk society.” British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq018

Beddoe, L. (2012). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197–213. doi:10.1080/031240 7X.2011.591187

Beddoe, L. (2015). Supervision and developing the profession: One supervision or many? China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 150–163. doi:10.1080/17525098.201 5.1039173

Beddoe, L., & Egan, R. (2009). Social work supervision.In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (2nd ed, pp. 410–422). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision: Current themes and models for practice. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Tsui, M. (2016). Towards an international consensus on a research agenda for social work supervision: Report on the first survey of a Delphi study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568–1586. doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv110

Bell, H., & Thorpe, A. (2004). External supervision: What is it for a social worker in schools? Te Komako VII, Social Work Review, 16(2), 12–14.

Bradley, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Höjer, S. (2010). Supervision: A force for change? Three stories told. International Social Work, 53(6), 773–790. doi:10.1177/0020872809358401

Bradley, G., & Höjer, S. (2009). Supervision reviewed: reflections on two different social work models in England and Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 71–85. doi:10.1080/13691450802220990

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London, England: Sage.

Busse, S. (2009). Supervision between critical reflection and practical action. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23, 159–173.

Carpenter, J., Webb, C. M., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853. doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.014

Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

Davys, A., May, J., Burns, B., & O’Connell, M. (2017). Evaluating social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(3), 108–121. doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id314

Egan, R. (2012). Australian social work supervision practice in 2007. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 171–184. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2011.653575

Eruera, M. (2012). He korari, he kete, he korero. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 24(3/4), 12–19.

Hair, H. (2012). The purpose and duration of supervision, and the training and discipline of supervisors: What social workers say they need to provide effective services. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1562–1588. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs071

Harvey, A., & Henderson, F. (2014). Reflective supervision for child protection practice: Reaching beneath the surface. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 343–356. doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.925862

Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Itzhaky, H. (2001). Factors relating to “interferences” in communication between supervisor and supervisee: Differences between the external and internal supervisor. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(1), 73–87.

Mo, K. Y.-h., & O’Donoghue, K. (2018). Nurturing a budding flower: External supervisors’ support of the developmental needs of Chinese social workers in Shenzhen, China. International Social Work. doi:10.1177/0020872818755856

Mo, K. Y.-h., & Tsui, M. S. (2018). Toward an indigenized external supervision approach in China. International Social Work. doi:10.1177/0020872818778104

Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. J., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83(1), 3–32. doi.org/10.1086/599028

Morrell, M. (2001). External supervision—confidential or accountable? An exploration of the relationship between agency, supervisor and supervisee. Social Work Review, 13, 36–41.

Morrell, M. (2008). Supervision contracts revisited: Towards a negotiated agreement. Social Work Review, 20, 22–31.

Morrison, T. (2001). Staff supervision in social care: Making a real difference for staff and service users. Brighton, England: Pavilion.

Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a

rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. doi:10.1177/1468017309334848

O’Donoghue, K. (2010). Towards the construction of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. A study of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, NZ.

O’Donoghue, K. (2015). Issues and challenges facing social work supervision in the twenty-first century. China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 136–149. doi:10.1080/1752 5098.2015.1039172

O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R., & Trlin, A. (2005). Mapping the territory: Supervision within the association. Social Work Review, 17(4), 46–64.

O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R., & Trlin, A. (2006). What’s best about social work supervision according to association members. Social Work Review, 18(3), 79–91.

O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M.S. (2012). Towards a professional supervision culture: The development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1), 5–28. doi:10.1177/0020872810396109

Rankine, M. (2013). Getting a different perspective: Piloting the “group consult” model for supervision in a community-based setting. Practice, 25(2), 105–120.

Rankine, M. (2017). What are we thinking? Supervision as the vehicle for reflective practice in community- based child welfare services (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, NZ.

Rankine, M., Beddoe, L., O’Brien, M., & Fouché, C. (2018). What’s your agenda? Reflective supervision in community-based child welfare services, European Journal of Social Work, 21, 428–440. doi:10.1080/13691 457.2017.1326376

Sewell, K. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal. doi:10.1007/s10615-018-0679-0

White, V. (2015). Reclaiming reflective supervision. Practice: Social Work in Action, 27(4), 251–264. doi.org/10.1080/0 9503153.2015.1048055

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Rankine, M. (2019). The internal/external debate: The tensions within social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id646

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.