Registered social workers who are supervisors: A national survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id651Keywords:
supervision, social work, supervisors, cultural responsivenessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Aotearoa New Zealand registered social workers who supervise are expected to provide supervision in accordance with the Social Workers Registration Board standards. This article aims to establish baseline about supervisors and their supervision.
METHODS: A national postal survey of 278 registered social workers supervision gathered data about the background, experiences and views of 138 supervisors. The quantitative data were analysed using IBM SPSS 24. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests were applied to explore variances in means for the independent variables of type of registration, area of practice, gender, age, ethnic identity, sexual orientation, recognised qualifications, experience as social worker, experience as a supervisor, and supervisory training and education across six scales concerned with the respondents’ provision of supervision.
FINDINGS: The findings provide baseline demographic information about the supervisors, as well as descriptions of their supervisory practice. This includes information regarding the forms, logistics, types of contact, the approaches and models used, session processes and their overall satisfaction and evaluation of the supervision they provide.
CONCLUSIONS: The article concludes that most supervisors provided supervision that is typical of individual, clinical or professional supervision and was aligned with professional standards. Questions were raised concerning the predominance of non-Māori supervisors and the cultural relevancy, safety and responsiveness of supervisors to Māori. Suggestions are made regarding the development of the supervisory workforce. Areas for further research are identified regarding the differences in supervisory practice related to fields of practice, ethnicity, experience, qualifications and training.
References
Autagavaia, M. (2001). A Tagata Pasifika supervision process: Authenticating difference. In L. Beddoe & J. Worrall (Eds.), Supervision conference 7–8 July 2000, From rhetoric to reality. Keynote address and selected papers (pp. 45–53). Auckland, NZ: Auckland College of Education.
Beddoe, L. (2015). Supervision and developing the profession: One supervision or many? China Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 150–163. doi:10.1080/ 17525098.2015.1039173
Beddoe, L. (2016). Supervision in social work in Aotearoa New Zealand: Challenges in changing contexts. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(2), 156–174. doi:10.1080/073252 23.2016.1217497
Beddoe, L., & Howard, F. (2012). Interprofessional supervision in social work and psychology: Mandates and (inter) professional relationships. The Clinical Supervisor, 31, 178–202. doi:10.1080/07325223.2013. 730471
Davys, A. (2002). Perceptions through a prism: Three accounts of good social work supervision (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North. Retrieved from http://mro.massey.ac.nz/ handle/10179/5754
Davys, A. (2017). Interprofessional supervision: A matter of difference. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(3), 79–94. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj- vol29iss3id278
Davys, A., May, J., Burns, B., & O’Connell, M. (2017). Evaluating social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(3), 108–121. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id314
De Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
Eketone, A. (2012). The purposes of cultural supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 24(3/4), 20–30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol24iss3-4id104
Eruera, M. M. (2005). He kōrero kōrari: Supervision for Māori: Weaving the past, into the present for the future (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massey University, Albany, Auckland. Retrieved from http://mro.massey. ac.nz/handle/10179/6471
Gillanders, M. (2009). Towards the development of “good practices” for recording social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand after the introduction of registration (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin. Retrieved from http://ourarchive.otago. ac.nz/handle/10523/368
Howard, F., Beddoe, L., & Mowjood, A. (2013). Interprofessional supervision in social work and psychology in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(4), 25–40. doi:https://doi. org/10.11157/anzswj-vol25iss4id60
Hutchings, J., Cooper, L., & O’Donoghue, K. (2014). Cross-disciplinary supervision amongst social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 26(4), 53–64.
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York : Columbia University Press.
Murray, V. R. (2017). Hoki ki tōu maunga kia purea ai koe ki ngā hau o Tāwhirimātea. A tangata whenua model of supervision (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7689
O’Donoghue, K. (2008). Towards improving social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 20(1), 10–21.
O’Donoghue, K. (2010). Towards the construction of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand: a study of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, Palmerston North. Retrieved from http://mro. massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/1535
O’Donoghue, K. (2018, May). The evolution of clinical supervision in social work in New Zealand 1994–2018. ACSA Conference proceedings. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Clinical Supervision Association (ACSA). Retrieved from http://clinicalsupervision.org.au/wp- content/uploads/2018/06/ACSA%20Conference%20 Day%202%20Proceedings.pdf
O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R., & Trlin, A. (2005). Mapping the territory: Supervision within the association. Social Work Review 17(4), 46–64.
O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R. & Trlin, A. (2006). What’s best about social work supervision according to association members. Social Work Review 18(3), 79–91.
O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. S. (2012). Towards a professional supervision culture: The development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1), 5–28. doi:10.1177/0020872810396109
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival guide (5th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Rankine, M. (2017). What are we thinking? Supervision as the vehicle for reflective practice in community- based child welfare services (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, NZ. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2292/34215
Sewell, K. M. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265. doi:10.1007/ s10615-018-0679-0
Simmons, H. (2006). Out of the closet: experiences and expressions of spirituality in supervision (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North. Retrieved from http://mro.massey.ac.nz/ handle/10179/6726
Social Workers Registration Board. (2015). Supervision expectations for registered social workers: Policy statement. Retrieved from http://swrb.govt.nz/download/ supervision-expectations-for-registered-social-workers/
Social Workers Registration Board. (2016). Code of Conduct. Retrieved from http://swrb.govt.nz/download/swrb-code- of-conduct-march-2016/
Su’a-Hawkins, A., & Mafile’o, T. (2004). What is cultural supervision? Social Work Now, 29, 10–16.
Thomas, C. (2005). What’s in a name? Strengths-based supervision—Reality or rhetoric: An analysis of supervision in an organisation with a vision of strengths-based practice (Unpublished master’s thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ. http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5656
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
