Implementing the integrated model of supervision: A view from the training room


  • Penny Sturt Independent Trainers, United Kingdom
  • Bridget Rothwell Independent Trainers, United Kingdom



Supervision, integrated model, context, relationship, system, reflection, resilience, restorative, recording, capacity


The integrated model remains fit for purpose as a framework for supervision which is under significant pressure in an environment of austerity and heightened demand. It will only realise its potential if the power of integration is understood and the influence of context is sufficiently recognised. Successful implementation relies fundamentally on two things: the capacity of both supervisor and supervisee to engage in a relationship, and the availability of systemic support for both that relationship and what it is designed to do.

This viewpoint explains the model, how we use it as trainers and some of the challenges to effective supervision practice we hear being discussed. Social work in the United Kingdom (UK) seems to be grappling with retaining the social when so much focus is on individualised approaches or, as we see them, fragmentary, partial understanding of context. We have summarised this fragmentation as being symbolised by 4Rs, and it remains our view that these elements need to be, and can be, integrated within the supervisory model. In the UK there has been a resurgence in strengths-based approaches, most recently, restorative practice. Arguably, being restorative has always been part of supervisory intention: we think the model supports this quite explicitly. Much emphasis is currently given to the (sometimes misunderstood concept of) resilience of practitioners and we believe the extrinsic elements of this need reiterating. The ability to reflect on the impact practitioners have on others, particularly those using their services, remains key. Finally, the issue of recording needs re-examination.


Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 99–109.

Disney, T., Warwick, L., Ferguson, H., Leigh, J., Cooner, T. S., Beddoe, L., . . . Osborne, T. (2019). “Isn’t it funny the children that are further away we don’t think about as much?”: Using GPS to explore the mobilities and geographies of social work and child protection practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 39–49. doi:https:beddbedd// childyouth.2019.02.029

Ferguson, H. (2008). Liquid social work: Welfare interventions as mobile practices. British Journal of Social Work, 38(3), 561–579.

Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427.

Grant, L., & Kinman, G. (Eds.). (2014). Developing resilience for social work practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grotberg, E. (1995). A guide to promoting resilience in children: Strengthening the human spirit. The Hague, Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation.

Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in Social Work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care: Making a real difference to staff and service users. Brighton, UK: Pavilion Publishing and Media.

Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. A child centred system. London, UK: Department for Education.

Riley, J., & Masten, A. (2005). Resilience in context. In R. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in children, families and communities: Linking context to practice and policy (pp. 13–25). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Wachtel, D. (2016). Defining restorative IIRP. Retrieved from 2016.pdf

Wilkins, D., Jones, R., & Westlake, D. (2018). The activity does not archive well: Comparing audio and written records of supervision case discussions in Children’s Services. Journal of Children’s Services, 13(3/4), 93–109. doi:10.1108/JCS-03-2018-0005

Wonnacott, J. (2012). Mastering social work supervision. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Wonnacott, J. (2014). Developing and supporting effective staff supervision. Brighton, UK: Pavilion Publishing and Media.




How to Cite

Sturt, P., & Rothwell, B. (2019). Implementing the integrated model of supervision: A view from the training room. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 116–121.