Implementing the integrated model of supervision: A view from the training room

Authors

  • Penny Sturt Independent Trainers, United Kingdom
  • Bridget Rothwell Independent Trainers, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id652

Keywords:

Supervision, integrated model, context, relationship, system, reflection, resilience, restorative, recording, capacity

Abstract

The integrated model remains fit for purpose as a framework for supervision which is under significant pressure in an environment of austerity and heightened demand. It will only realise its potential if the power of integration is understood and the influence of context is sufficiently recognised. Successful implementation relies fundamentally on two things: the capacity of both supervisor and supervisee to engage in a relationship, and the availability of systemic support for both that relationship and what it is designed to do.

This viewpoint explains the model, how we use it as trainers and some of the challenges to effective supervision practice we hear being discussed. Social work in the United Kingdom (UK) seems to be grappling with retaining the social when so much focus is on individualised approaches or, as we see them, fragmentary, partial understanding of context. We have summarised this fragmentation as being symbolised by 4Rs, and it remains our view that these elements need to be, and can be, integrated within the supervisory model. In the UK there has been a resurgence in strengths-based approaches, most recently, restorative practice. Arguably, being restorative has always been part of supervisory intention: we think the model supports this quite explicitly. Much emphasis is currently given to the (sometimes misunderstood concept of) resilience of practitioners and we believe the extrinsic elements of this need reiterating. The ability to reflect on the impact practitioners have on others, particularly those using their services, remains key. Finally, the issue of recording needs re-examination.

References

Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 99–109.

Disney, T., Warwick, L., Ferguson, H., Leigh, J., Cooner, T. S., Beddoe, L., . . . Osborne, T. (2019). “Isn’t it funny the children that are further away we don’t think about as much?”: Using GPS to explore the mobilities and geographies of social work and child protection practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 39–49. doi:https:beddbedd//doi.org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2019.02.029

Ferguson, H. (2008). Liquid social work: Welfare interventions as mobile practices. British Journal of Social Work, 38(3), 561–579.

Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427.

Grant, L., & Kinman, G. (Eds.). (2014). Developing resilience for social work practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grotberg, E. (1995). A guide to promoting resilience in children: Strengthening the human spirit. The Hague, Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation.

Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in Social Work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care: Making a real difference to staff and service users. Brighton, UK: Pavilion Publishing and Media.

Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. A child centred system. London, UK: Department for Education.

Riley, J., & Masten, A. (2005). Resilience in context. In R. Peters, B. Leadbeater, & R. McMahon (Eds.), Resilience in children, families and communities: Linking context to practice and policy (pp. 13–25). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Wachtel, D. (2016). Defining restorative IIRP. Retrieved from https://iirp.edu/images/pdf/Defining-Restorative_Nov- 2016.pdf

Wilkins, D., Jones, R., & Westlake, D. (2018). The activity does not archive well: Comparing audio and written records of supervision case discussions in Children’s Services. Journal of Children’s Services, 13(3/4), 93–109. doi:10.1108/JCS-03-2018-0005

Wonnacott, J. (2012). Mastering social work supervision. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Wonnacott, J. (2014). Developing and supporting effective staff supervision. Brighton, UK: Pavilion Publishing and Media.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Sturt, P., & Rothwell, B. (2019). Implementing the integrated model of supervision: A view from the training room. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id652

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Commentary

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.