Where do we go from here? Ongoing colonialism from Attachment Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol32iss1id702Keywords:
Indigenous child protection, attachment theory, colonisation, reconciliationAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The article challenges the current interpretation of Attachment Theory (AT) which favours placement of Indigenous children in non-Indigenous homes. Historical attempts to assimilate Indigenous populations are examined in relation to ongoing assimilation within child intervention and justice systems. The goal is to stimulate discussion about possible culturally appropriate models to articulate the complex and multiple attachments formed by an Indigenous person who is brought up in an Indigenous community, compared to the popular Western and Eurocentric view of parenting through dyadic attachment derived from AT.
METHODS: A review of AT literature examining key questions of cross-cultural applicability validity in relation to Indigenous populations. Consultations were held with Elders from the Blackfoot Confederacy of Alberta as part of the Nistawatsiman project. Data were gathered in a project relating to AT and the Supreme Court of Canada.
FINDINGS: Cultural Attachment Theory is emerging as a preferred way to think of Indigenous contexts as opposed to applying traditional AT. The validity of AT with Indigenous families is likely not valid and perpetuates colonial and assimilative understandings of family, parenting and the place of culture.
CONCLUSIONS: Pan-Indigenous methods bias child intervention, blinding them to the capacity of Indigenous caring systems’ capacity to raise their children. The use of AT sustains over- representation of Indigenous children in care and continues the colonial practices of fracturing Indigenous caregiving systems which, in turn, creates the patterns for the next generation’s over-representation in care. Indigenous ways of knowing and being are required along with Indigenous-based decision making.
References
Ainsworth, M. D. (1964). Patterns of attachment behavior shown by the infant in interaction with his mother. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 51–58.
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1127388
Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Watts, E., & Wall, S. (2015). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation (The classic edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
Behrens, K. Y. (2016). Reconsidering attachment in context of culture: Review of attachment studies in Japan. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(1). https://doi. org/10.9707/2307-0919.1140
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1: Attachment). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(Sep 92), 759–775. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/57387969/
Brown v. Canada (Attorney General). (2017). ONSC 251. ON, Canada: Superior Court of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2017/2017onsc25 1/2017onsc251.html?resultIndex=1
Caltabiano, M. L., & Thorpe, R. (2007). Attachment style of foster carers and caregiving role performance. Child Care in Practice, 13(2), 137–143. https://doi. org/10.1080/13575270701201201
Canada. (2019). An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families. S.C. 2019, c. 24. Retrieved from https://laws.justice. gc.ca/PDF/F-11.73.pdf
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. (2016). First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 2016 CHRT 2. Ottawa, ON: CHRT. Retrieved from https://fncaringsociety.com/ sites/default/files/2016%20CHRT%20Ruling%20on%20 FN%20child%20welfare%20case.pdf
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. (2017). First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 2017 CHRT 14 Ottawa, ON: Author. Retrieved from https://fncaringsociety.com/sites/ default/files/2017%20CHRT%2014.pdf
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. (2018). First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 2018 CHRT 4 Ottawa, ON: Author. Retrieved from https://fncaringsociety.com/sites/ default/files/2018%20CHRT%204.pdf
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. (2019). First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 2019 CHRT 7 Ottawa, ON: Author. Retrieved from https://fncaringsociety.com/sites/ default/files/2019_chrt_7.pdf
Canadian Psychological Association & Psychology Foundation of Canada. (2018). Psychology’s response to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s report. Toronto, ON: Author.
Carriere, J. (2005). Connectedness and health for First Nation adoptees. Paediatrics & Child Health, 10(9), 545. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/10.9.545
Carriere, J., & Richardson, C. (2017). Calling our families home: Metis peoples’ experience with child welfare. Vernon, BC: J Charlton.
Cassidy, J. (2016). The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy and Phil Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford.
Choate, P. (2019). The call to decolonise: Social work’s challenge for working with Indigenous people. British Journal of Social Work, 49(4), 1081–1099. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz011
Choate, P., Kohler, T., Cloete, F., CrazyBull, B., Lindstrom, D., & Tatoulis, P. (2019). Rethinking Racine v Woods from a decolonizing perspective: Challenging the applicability of attachment theory to indigenous families involved with child protection. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 34(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/ cls.2019.8
Choate, P., & Lindstrom, G. (2017). Parenting capacity assessment as a colonial strategy. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 37(1), 41–60.
Craft, A. (2013). Reading beyond the lines: Oral understandings and Aboriginal litigation. Paper presented to Public Interest Law, Winnipeg, MB.
Crey, E., & Fournier, S. (1998). Stolen from our embrace. The abduction of First Nations children and the restoration of Aboriginal communities. Toronto, ON: Douglas & McIntyre Publishers.
Drisko, J. W., & Grady, M. D. (2019). Evidence based practice in clinical social work (2nd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ewert v. Canada. (2018) SCC 30. Canada: Supreme Court. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2018/2018scc30/ 2018scc30.html?searchUrlHash= AAAAAQARRXdlcnQgdi4gQ2FuYWRhLiAAAAAAAQ& resultIndex=1
Fleming, A. H. (2016). Ngā Tāpiritanga: In what ways are indigenous Māori perspectives on attachment similar to and different from Western psychoanalytic perspectives on attachment and what are the implications for the practice of psychotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand? A Kaupapa Māori Critical Literature Review (Unpublished master’s thesis). Te Wānanga Aronui o Tāmaki Makau Rau, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland. Retrieved from https://openrepository. aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/10510/FlemingA. pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Gee, G., & Ford, C. (2011). Structural racism and health inequities: Old issues and new directions. Du Bois Review, 8, 115–132. https://doi. org/10.10170S1742058X11000130
GM v Carmarthenshire County Council (2018) EWFC 36. Carmarthenshire, UK: Family Court. Retrieved from https://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/gm-v- carmarthenshire-county-council-2018-ewfc-36.
Granqvist, P., Sroufe, A., Dozier, H., Hesse, E., Steele, M., ... Duschinsky, R. (2017). Disorganized attachment in infancy: A review of the phenomenon and its impact for clinicians and policy-makers. Attachment and Human Development, 19(6), 534–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14 616734.2017.1354040
Hesse, E. (2016). The adult attachment interview: Protocol, methods of analysis and selected empirical studies: 1985-2015. In J. Cassidy and Phil Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 553–597). New York, NY: Guilford.
Hossain, B., & Lamb, L. (2019). Cultural attachment and wellbeing among Canada’s Indigenous people: A rural urban divide. Journal of Happiness Studies, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00132-8
International Federation of Social Workers. (2018). Global social work statement of ethical principles. Rheinfelden, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of- ethical-principles/
Kaplan, G. C., & Main, M. (1966). Adult attachment interview. [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkley. Retrieved from http:// www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/measures/content/aai_interview.pdf
Keller, H. (2018). Universality claim of attachment theory: Children’s socio-emotional development across cultures. PNAS, 115(45), 11414–11419. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1720325115
Keller, H., & Bard, K. (2017). The cultural nature of attachment: Contextualizing relationships and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Le Grice, J., Braun, V., & Wetherell, M. (2017). “What I reckon is, is that like the love you give to your kids they’ll give to someone else and so on and so on”: Whanaungatanga and mātauranga Māori in practice. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 88–97.
Lindstrom, G., & Choate, P. (2016). Nistawatsiman: Rethinking assessment of Aboriginal parents for child welfare following the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 11(2), 45–59. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/fpcfr/ index.php/FPCFR/article/view/305
Lindstrom, G., Choate, P., Bastien, L., Weasel Traveller, A., Breaker, S., Breaker, C., ... Good Good Striker, E. (2016). Nistawatsimin: Exploring First Nations parenting: A literature review and expert consultation with Blackfoot Elders. Calgary, AB: Mount Royal University. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 303544458_Nistawatsamin_EXPLORING_FIRST_NATIONS_PARENTINGA_LITERATURE_ REVIEW_AND_EXPERT_CONSULTATION
McCarthy, J. R., & Gillies, V. (2018). Troubling children’s families: Who is troubled and why? Approaches to inter- cultural dialogue. Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804117746871
Mesman, J., van Ijzendoorn, M., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852–877). New York, NY: Guilford.
Miller, B. G. (2011). Oral history in trial: Recognizing Aboriginal narratives in court. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Neckoway, R. (2011). The role of culture in parenting: Some Ojibway parents’ perspectives. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador.
Neckoway, R., Brownlee, K., & Castellan, B. (2007). Is attachment theory consistent with aboriginal parenting realities? First Peoples Child & Family Review, 3(2), 65–74.
Ned, J. D., Frost, C. J. (Eds.). (2017). Contemporary issues in child welfare: American Indian and Canadian Aboriginal contexts. Vernon, BC: J. Charlton Publishing.
Racine v Woods. (1983). 2 SCR 173. Canada: Supreme Court. Retrieved from https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/ scc-csc/en/item/2476/index.do
Simard, E. (2009). Culturally restorative child welfare practices: A special emphasis on cultural attachment theory. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 4(2), 44–61.
Simard, E., & Blight S. (2011). Developing a culturally restorative approach to Aboriginal child and youth development: Transitions to adulthood. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 6(1), 28–55.
Sinclair, R. (2007). Identity lost and found: Lessons from the sixties scoop. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 3(1), 65–82.
Stewart, J., & Allan, J. (2013). Building relationships with Aboriginal people: A cultural mapping toolbox. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 118–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 312407X.2012.708937
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, Reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.trc.ca/ websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Honouring_the_Truth_Reconciling_for_the_Future_July_23_2015.pdf
van der Horst, F.C.P. (2011). John Bowlby – from psychoanalysis to ethology: Unraveling the roots of attachment theory. Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2008). Cross- cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 880–905). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Vicedo, M. (2017). Putting attachment in its place: Disciplinary and cultural contexts. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(6), 684–699. https://doi. org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1289838
Weisner, S. T. (2005). Attachment as a cultural and ecological problem with pluralistic solutions. Human Development, 48(1–2), 89–94. https://dx.doi.org/ doi:10.1159/000083219
White, S., Gibson, M., & Wastell, D. (2019). Child protection and disorganized attachment: A critical commentary. Children and Youth Services Review, 105, October. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104415
White, S., Gibson, M., Wastell, D., & Walsh, P. (2020). Reassessing attachment theory in child welfare. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
