“Pasifika families aren’t accessing specialist services as much because those services require a really one-eyed view of the child”
How social workers engage Pasifika children with disability and their families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol35iss2id784Keywords:
Pasifika, children with disabilities, decolonisation, indigenisation, anti-racist practiceAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Accessing disability services in Aotearoa New Zealand is not a simple process. Pasifika families experiencing disability underutilise disability services. This research explores how social workers work successfully with Pasifika families of children with disabilities in Aotearoa New Zealand, a traditionally western-practice-dominated country. It specifically explores how practice is adapted and which frameworks are deemed successful in this field.
METHOD: This qualitative research uses semi-structured interviews with four social workers working with Pasifika families of children with disability. Interviews were thematically analysed.
FINDINGS: Using an anti-oppressive framework for analysis, this study found it is important for social workers to understand the differences when working with Pasifika families of children with disabilities, this includes: knowledge of Pasifika values, Pasifika social work practice frameworks, relationships, cultural humility and meeting families where they are at. This understanding is necessary for successful social work with Pasifika families of children with disability.
IMPLICATIONS: Anti-oppressive practice addressing structural, cultural and personal oppression is crucial for successful social work with Pasifika families of children with disability. Using an anti-oppressive practice approach, which incorporates the intentional inclusion of decolonisation, indigenisation and anti-racist practice provides a conceptual framework for working successfully with Pasifika families of children with disability.
References
Bryan, W. V. (2007). Multicultural aspects of disabilities: A guide to understanding and assisting minorities in the rehabilitation process (2nd ed.). Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Callahan, M., & Swift, K. (2007). The paradox of risk assessment, child safety and empowerment in child welfare. In L. Domenelli (Ed.), Reviatlising communities in a globalising world (pp. 67–77).
Carter, I., Hanes, R., & MacDonald, J. (2017). Beyond the social model of disability. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti- oppressive practice: Social justice social work (3rd ed., pp. 153–171). Fernwood Publishing.
Crichton-Hill, Y. (2018). Pasifika social work. In M. Connolly, L. Harms, & J. Maidment (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (4th ed., pp. 109–120). Oxford University Press.
Dominelli, L. (1996). Anti-Racist probation practice.
https://doi-org.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/10.4324/9781315262369
Dominelli, L. (2018). Anti-racist social work (4th ed.). Palgrave.
Egan, R., & Papadopoulos, A. (2016). Critical anti-oppressive and strengths-based practice. In J. Maidment & R. Egan (Eds.), Practice skills in social work & welfare: More than just good sense (3rd ed., pp. 35–47). Allen & Unwin.
Fuamatu, N. (2019). Quality of life: A phenomenological study of experiences of Samoans with a disability
in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Monash University. https:// www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Quality-of-Life%3A-A-Phenomenological-study-of-the-of-Fuamatu/ d393a8401964e7abe1fe3c0f09f48a7c7386a732
Groce, N. E. (2004). Adolescents and youth with disability: Issues and challenges. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 15(2), 13–32.
Hickey, H. (2006). Replacing medical and social models of disability by a communities-based model of equal access for people of differing abilities: A Māori perspective. Puna Korero: Journal of Māori and Pacific Development, 7(1), 35–47.
Hickey, H., & Wilson, D. (2017). Whānau hauā: Reframing disability from an indigenous perspective. Mai Journal, 6(1), 82–94.
Hollinsworth, D. (2013). Decolonizing indigenous disability in Australia. Disability and Society, 28(5), 601–615.
Holosko, M. J. (2011). Overview of qualitative research methods. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook
of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 264–272).
Huakau, G., & Bray, A. (2000). “Talking disabilities” from a Pacific perspective. Donald Beasley Institute.
Ife, J. (2020). Whiteness from within. In S. Tacsón & J. Ife (Eds.), Disrupting whiteness in social work (pp. 26–42). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284182.
Mafile’o, T. (2019). Social work with Pacific communities. In R. Munford & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), New theories for social work practice: Ethical practice for working with individuals, families and communities (pp. 212–230). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Mafile’o, T., Mitaera, J., & Mila, K. (2019). Pacific-indigenous social work theories and models. In J. Ravulo, T. Mafile’o, & D. B. Yeates (Eds.), Pacific social work: Navigating practice, policy and research (pp. 22–34). Routledge.
Maidment, J., & Egan, R. (2016). Introduction: The integrated practice framework. In J. Maidment & R. Egan (Eds.), Practice skills in social work & welfare: More than just common sense (3rd ed., pp. 3–18). Allen & Unwin.
Marlow, C. R. (2011). Research methods in generalist social work (5th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Ministry of Health. (2017). Faiva Ora 2016-2021: National Pasifika Disability Plan. https://www.health.govt.nz/ system/files/documents/publications/faiva-ora-2016- 2021-national-pasifika-disability-plan-aug17_0.pdf
Munford, R., & Bennie, G. (2013). Social work and disability. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice (3rd ed., pp. 194–205). Oxford University Press.
Office for Disability Issues. (2016). New Zealand disabilty strategy 2016-2026. Ministry of Social Development. https://www.odi.govt.nz/assets/New-Zealand-Disability- Strategy-files/pdf-nz-disability-strategy-2016.pdf
Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie,
J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 1–25). Sage Publications.
Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ravulo, J. (2016). Pacific epistomologies in professional social work practice, policy and research. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 26(4), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2016.1 234970
Ravulo, J., Mafile’o, T., & Yeates, D. B. (2019). Introduction to Pacific social work: Places, peoples, perspectives and practices. In J. Ravulo, T. Mafile’o, & D. B. Yeates (Eds.), Pacific social work: Navigating practice, policy and research (pp. 3–10). Routledge.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Elam, G., Tennant, R., & Rahim, N. (2014). Designing and selecting samples. In R. Ormston, L. Spencer, M. Barnard, & D. Snape (Eds.), The foundations of qualitative research: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 111–145). Sage Publications.
Sims, T. (2016). Dismantling white privilege: The ongoing journey to become an ally. In M. A. Hart, A. D. Burton, K. Hart, G. Rowe, D. Halonen, & Y. Pompana (Eds.), International indigenous voices in social work (pp. 187–215).
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., O’Connor, W., & Barnard, M. (2014). Analysis: Principles and processes. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (2nd ed., pp. 269–293). Sage Publications.
Statistics New Zealand. (2013a). 2013 Census ethnic group profiles. http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013- census/profile-and-summary-reports/ethnic-profiles.aspx
Statistics New Zealand. (2013b). 2013 New Zealand disability survey. https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/ disability-survey-2013: Statistics New Zealand. (n.d.). Pacific peoples ethnic group. https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/2018-census-ethnic-group-summaries/pacific-peoples
Su’a-Tavila, A. (2019). Contemporary Pacific values and beliefs. In J. Ravulo, T. Mafile’o, & D. B. Yeates (Eds.), Pacific social work: Navigating practice, policy and research (pp. 11–21). Routledge.
Tacsón, S., & Ife, J. (2020). Introduction. In S. Tacsón & J. Ife (Eds.), Disrupting whiteness in social work (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284182.
Tahaafe, S. L. o. T. i. (2003). Introducting disability concepts with integrity into Tongan cultural context [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Albany University.
United Nations. (2006). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/ esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm
Weaver, H. N. (2015). Social work, Indigenous ways, and the power of intersection. In C. Fejo-King & P. Mataira (Eds.), Expanding the conversation: International indigenous social workers’ insights in to the use of Indigenist knowledge and theory in practice (pp. 7–21). Magpie Goose Publishing.
Yeates, D. B. (2019). Seeing abilities: Disability in the Pacific. In J. Ravulo, T. Mafile’o, & D. B. Yeates (Eds.), Pacific social work: Navigating practice, policy and research (pp. 37–46). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
