Companion-animal-inclusive domestic violence practice: Implications for service delivery and social work
Keywords:Companion animals, domestic violence, victims/survivors, service provision, social work
INTRODUCTION: Based on an understanding of links between human- and animal-directed domestic violence, this article: 1) argues for companion-animal inclusive domestic violence service delivery; and 2) reflects on the challenges this offers to social work and the human services.
APPROACH: We start by considering the importance of companion animals in many people’s lives and then offer an overview of material on “the link” between human- and animal-directed violence, specifically as it pertains to domestic violence.
CONCLUSIONS: Implications for service design and provision are discussed. We conclude with brief comments about the importance of centring animals in future considerations of human– animal violence links and outline how this offers an opportunity to challenge and re-think the humanist foundations on which traditional social work is built.
Adams, C. (2016). The Carol J Adams reader. Bloomsbury.
Adamson, C., & Darroch, J. (2016). When Ida came to class: The inclusion of animals in the social work curriculum. [online]. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 18(2), 39–51.
Akiyama, H., Holtzman, J. M., & Britz, W. E. (1987). Pet ownership and health status during bereavement. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 17(2), 187–193.
Arbour, R., Signal, T., & Taylor, N. (2009). Teaching kindness: The promise of humane education. Society and Animals, 17(2), 136–148.
Ascione, F. R., Weber, C. V., Thompson, T. M., Heath, J., Maruyama, M., & Hayashi, K. (2007). Battered pets and domestic violence: Animal abuse reported by women experiencing intimate violence and by nonabused women. Violence Against Women, 13(4), 354–373.
Barrett, B., Fitzgerald, A., Peirone, A., Stevenson, R., & Cheung, C. H. (2018). Helpseeking among abused women with pets: Evidence from a Canadian sample. Violence and Victims, 33, 604–626.
Becker, F., & French, L. (2004). Making the links: Child abuse, animal cruelty and domestic violence. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 13(6), 399–414.
Bell, K. (2012). Towards a post-conventional philosophical base for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(3), 408–423.
Boetto, H. (2017). A transformative eco-social model: Challenging modernist assumptions in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 48–67.
Bonas, S., McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. (2000). Pets in the network of family relationships: An empirical study. In A. Podberscek, E. Paul, & J. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 209–236). Cambridge University Press.
Bryant, W., & Bricknall, S. (2017). Homicide in Australia 2012-2014: National Homicide Monitoring Program report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from https://aic.gov.au/ publications/sr/sr002
Charles, N. (2014). “Animals just love you as you are”: Experiencing kinship across the species barrier. Sociology, 48(4), 715–730.
Charles, N. (2016). Post-human families? Dog-human relations in the domestic sphere. Sociological Research Online 21(3), 1–12.
Collins, E., Cody, A., MacDonald, S., Nicotera, N., Ascione, F., & Williams, J. (2018). A template analysis of intimate partner violence survivors’ experiences of animal maltreatment: Implications for safety planning and intervention. Violence Against Women, 24(4), 452–476.
Companion Animals in New Zealand (NZCAC). (2016). The New Zealand Companion Animal Council, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.nzvna.org.nz/site/nzvna/ files/Documents/Companionper cent20Animals_in_New_ Zealand_2016_Report_web.pdf
Cronley, C., Strand, E., Patterson, D., & Gwaltney, S. (2009). Homeless people who are animal caretakers: A comparative study. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 481–499.
Degenhardt, B. (2005). Statistical summary of offenders charged with crimes against companion animals. July 2001–July 2004. Animal Abuse Control Team. Chicago, IL: Chicago Police Department.
Dominelli, L. (2012). Green social work: From environmental crises to environmental justice. Polity.
Evans, N., & Gray, C. (2012). The practice and ethics of animal-assisted therapy with children and young people: Is it enough that we don’t eat our co-workers? The British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 600–617.
Faver, C. A., & Strand, E. B. (2007). Fear, guilt, and grief: Harm to pets and the emotional abuse of women. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 7(1), 51–70.
Fitzgerald, A. (2005). Animal abuse and family violence: Researching the interrelationships of abusive power. Edwin Mellen.
Fitzgerald, A. (2007). “They gave me a reason to live”: The protective effects of companion animals on the suicidality of abused women. Humanity & Society, 31, 355–378.
Fitzgerald, A., Barrett, B., Stevenson, R., & Cheung, C. (2019). Animal maltreatment in the context of intimate partner violence: A manifestation of power and control? Violence Against Women [online first] doi:10.1177/1077801218824993
Flynn, C. (2012). Understanding animal abuse: A sociological perspective. Lantern Books.
Flynn, C. (2000). Woman’s best friend: Pet abuse and the role of companion animals in the lives of battered women. Violence Against Women, 6, 162–177.
Fraser, H., Bartholomaeus, C., Riggs, D., Taylor, N., & Rosenberg, S. (2019). Service provider recognition of trans and cisgender women of diverse sexualities, and the significance of animal companionship. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 22(1), 16–30.
Fraser, H., Beddoe, L., & Ballantyne, N. (2017). Editorial: Is there a renaissance of radical social work? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(2), 1–5.
Fraser, H., & Seymour, K. (2017). Understanding violence and abuse: An anti-oppressive practice perspective. Fernwood Press.
Fraser, H., & Taylor, N. (2017). In good company: Women, companion animals and social work. Society & Animals, 25(4), 341–361.
Fraser, H., Taylor, N., & Morley, C. (2017). Social work and interspecies care: An intersectional perspective on ethics, principles and practices. In B. Pease (Ed.), The politics of caring: Towards a critical ethic of care in social work (pp. 229–240). Routledge.
Garrity, T. F., Stallones, L., Marx, M. B., & Johnson, T. P. (1989). Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoos, 3, 35–44.
Hoy-Gerlach, J., Delgado, M., Sloane, H., Arkow, P. (2019). Rediscovering connections between animal welfare and human welfare: Creating social work internships at a humane society. Journal of Social Work, 19(2), 216–232.
Humphrey, B. (2002). Child welfare, animal welfare – strengthening the links. Social Work Now, 4–9 (December).
It’s Not OK. (2017). Family violence: It’s not OK [infographic]. Retrieved from http://www.areyouok.org.nz/assets/ Uploads/Infographic-Poster-2017-2.pdf
Krause-Parello, C.A. (2012). Pet ownership and older women: The relationships among loneliness, pet attachment support, human social support, and depressed mood. Geriatric Nursing, 33(3), 194-203.
Krause-Parello, C. A., Sarni, S., & Padden, E. (2016). Military veterans and canine assistance for post-traumatic stress disorder: A narrative review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 47, 43–50.
Laing, M. (2019, July). Encountering interspecies homelessness: Subversively smashing anthropocentrism in social work and the all-too-human services. Paper presented at Decolonising Animals: Australasian Animal Studies Conference, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Lynch, J. (2017). Greyhounds go behind bars to learn how to become pets, teach prisoners responsibilities, ABC News South West WA. Retrieved from https:// www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-09/greyhounds- as-pets-program-benefits-bunbury-prisoners-and- dogs/8689346
Montminy-Danna, M. (2007). Child welfare and animal cruelty: A survey of child welfare workers, Journal of Emotional Abuse, 73, 83–96.
Papazian, N. (2014). No one ever asked me that: The value of social work inquiry into the human-animal bond. In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in Social Work: Why and How they Matter (pp. 167–180). Palgrave.
Peak, T., Ascione, F., & Doney, J. (2012). Adult protective services and animal welfare: should animal abuse and neglect be assessed during adult protective services screening? Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 37–49.
Perkins, J., Bartlett, H., Travers, C., & Rand, J. (2008). Dog-assisted therapy for older people with dementia: A review. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 27, 177–182.
Randour, M. L. (2007). Integrating animals into the family violence paradigm: Implications for policy and professional standards. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 7(3), 97–116.
Reading Buddies (North Shore, NSW). (2019). About reading buddies. Retrieved from https://www.k9readingbuddies. org/about/
Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., & Rice, E. (2015). Pet ownership among homeless youth: Associations with mental health, service utilization and housing status. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46(2), 237–244.
Riggs, D. W. (2019). Working with transgender young people and their families: A critical developmental approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Riggs, D.W., Taylor, N., Signal, T., Fraser, H., & Donovan, C. (2018). People of diverse genders and/or sexualities and their animal companions: Experiences of family violence in a bi-national sample. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 4226-4247.
Risley-Curtiss, C. (2010). Social work and other animals: Living up to ecological practice. In M. DeMello (Ed.), Teaching the animal: Human-animal studies across the disciplines (pp. 281–298). Lantern Books.
Risley-Curtiss, C. (2013). Expanding the ecological lens in child welfare practice to include other animals. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(4), 107–130.
Risley-Curtiss, C., Holley, L. C., & Kodeine, S. (2011). “They’re there for you”: Men’s relationships with companion animals. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 92(4), 1–7.
Roguski, M. (2012). Pets as pawns: The co-existence of animal cruelty and family violence. Report to RNZSPCA and The National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges.
RSPCA. (2019). How many pets are there in Australia? Retrieved from https://kb.rspca.org.au/knowledge-base/ how-many-pets-are-there-in-australia/
Ryan, S., & Ziebland, S. (2015). On interviewing people with pets: Reflections from qualitative research on people with long-term conditions. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(1), 67–80.
Ryan, T. (2011). Animals and social work: A moral introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sanders. C. (1998). The canine-human “with”: Dogs, people and public interaction. International Society for Anthrozoology Newsletter, 16, 11–15.
Smith, B. (2012). The “pet effect”: Health related aspects of companion animal ownership. Australian Family Physician, 41(6), 439=442.
Stevenson, R., Fitzgerald, A., & Barrett, B. J. (2018). Keeping pets safe in the context of intimate partner violence: Insights from domestic violence shelter staff in Canada. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 33(2), 236–252.
Taylor, M. F., Edwards, M. E., & Pooley, J. A. (2013). “Nudging them back to reality”: Toward a growing public acceptance of the role dogs fulfill in ameliorating contemporary veterans’ PTSD symptoms. Anthrozoös, 26(4), 593–611.
Taylor, N., & Fraser, H. (2019). Rescuing you, rescuing me: Domestic violence and companion animals. Palgrave.
Taylor, N., Fraser, H., Signal, T., & Prentice, K. (2014). Social work, animals and ethics: A case study of an animal assisted therapy program for child sex abuse victims. British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 135–152.
Taylor, N., Riggs, D. W., Donovan, C., Signal, T., & Fraser, H. (2019). People of diverse genders and/or sexualities caring for and protecting animal companions in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 25(9), 1096–1115.
Volant, A. M., Johnson, J. A., Gullone, E., & Coleman, G. J. (2008). The relationship between domestic violence and animal abuse: An Australian study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1277–1295.
Walker, P., Aimers, J., & Perry, C. (2015). Animals and social work: An emerging field of practice for Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 27(1&2), 24–35.
Whitmarsh, L. (2005). The benefits of guide dog ownership. Visual Impairment Research, 7(1), 27–42.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.