No pets allowed: A trans-species social justice perspective to address housing issues for older adults and companion animals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol32iss4id793Keywords:
Housing, companion animals, pets, aging, trans-species social justice, Critical Animal Studies, human–animal relationsAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Significant benefits of companion animals (i.e., pets) for older adults are recognized and publications on Animal-Assisted Intervention, Animal-Assisted Activities and Animal-Assisted Therapies with older adults are growing. Studies on housing and community- residing older adults with companion animals from a non-utilitarian perspective on other animals, however, are rather limited.
METHODS: For this scoping review, we used a Critical Animal Studies perspective, in particular, a trans-species social justice framework to address two questions: “What are the scope and size of the literature on housing for community living older adults with companion animals?” and “What is known from the existing literature?” We searched peer-reviewed publications from 1980 to 2019 by using MEDLINE, PsychINFO, ProQuest and Scopus.
FINDINGS: Six works from Canada, Aotearoa New Zealand and US met our criteria. A disturbing reality was discovered: Restrictive leasing (‘no pets’ for rental housing) among low-income older adults with companion animals in public housing has persisted for the last 40 years and prevents them from accessing affordable housing. Also, the discourse of pets as problems or risk seems to justify prohibiting older adults from living with companion animals.
CONCLUSION: Utilising the concept of speciesism and a trans-species social justice framework for analysis, we argue that intersectional institutional oppression of speciesism and classism is a root cause of the situation. Justice for older adults cannot be achieved without justice for their companion animals. Future studies in human–animal relations and education and practice in social work need to incorporate ideas of speciesism and justice beyond humans.
References
Adams, C. J. (2010). The sexual politics of meat. Bloomsbury.
Adams, C. J., & Gruen, L. (Eds.). (2014). Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals & the earth. Bloomsbury.
American Pet Products Association. (2020). 2019–2020 National Pet Owners Survey. Retrieved from https:// www.americanpetproducts.org/pubs_survey.asp
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
Armbruster, K. (2019). Dogs, dirt, and public space.
In J. Sorenson & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human-canid relations (pp.113–134). McGill & Queen University Press.
Boat, B. W., & Knight, J. C. (2001). Experiences and needs of adult protective services case managers when assisting clients who have companion animals. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 12(3-4), 145–155. doi:10.1300/J084v12n03_07
Brooks, H., Rushton, K., Lovell, K., McNaughton, R., & Rogers, A. (2019). “He’s my mate you see”: A critical discourse analysis of the therapeutic role of companion animals in the social networks of people with a diagnosis of severe mental illness. Medical Humanities, 45(3), 326. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/10.1136/ medhum-2018-011633
Canadian Animal Health Institute (CAHI). (2019). Latest Canadian pet population figures released. Retrieved from https://www.cahi-icsa.ca/press-releases/latest- canadian-population-figures-released
Carlisle-Frank, P., Frank, J. M., & Nielsen, L. (2005). Companion animal renters and pet-friendly housing in the US. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 59–77.
Carter, J., & Taylor, C. (2017). Socio-economic factors in companion animal relinquishment on the sunshine coast, Australia. Society & Animals. https://doi. org/10.1163/15685306-12341473
Chalmers, D., Dell, C., Dixon, J., Rohr, B., Dowling, T., & Hanrahan, C., (2020). Recognizing animals as an important part of helping: A survey exploring knowledge and practice among Canadian social workers. Critical Social Work, 21(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/6224/5102
Chang, C. (2019). Gone stray: A journey of gou mama and their fur-kids. In J. Sorenson & A Matsuoka (Eds.), Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human-canid relations (pp. 209–229). McGill & Queen University Press.
Coe, J. B., Young, I., Lambert, K., Dysart, L., Nogueira Borden, L., & Rajić, A. (2014). A scoping review of published research on the relinquishment of companion animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17(3), 253–273.
DiGiacomo, N., Arluke, A., & Patronek, G. (1998). Surrendering pets to shelters: The relinquisher’s perspective. Anthrozoös, 11(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.1998.11425086
Dolan, E. D., Scotto, J., Slater, M., & Weiss, E. (2015). Risk factors for dog relinquishment to a Los Angeles municipal animal shelter. Animals, 5(4), 1311–1328.
Donovan, J. (2018). Animal ethics, the new materialism, and the question of subjectivity, In Matsuoka, A. & Sorenson, J. (Eds). Critical Animal Studies: Toward Trans-Species Social Justice. 257-274. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Dorfman, J., Denduluri, S., Walseman, K., & Bregman, B. (2012). The role of complementary and alternative medicine in end-of-life care. Psychiatric Annals, 42(4), 150–155. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00485713- 20120323-09
Ebenstein, H., & Wortham, J. (2001). The value of pets in geriatric practice: A program example. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 35(2), 99–115.
Engelman, S. R. (2013). Palliative care and use of animal- assisted therapy. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 67(1–2), 63–67. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/OM.67.1-2.g
Gee, N., & Mueller, M. (2019). A systematic review of research on pet ownership and animal interactions among older adults. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 183–207. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569903.
Geisler, A. M. (2004). Companion animals in palliative care: Stories from the bedside. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 21(4), 285–288. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/104990910402100411
Graham, T. M., Milaney, K. J., Adams, C. L., & Rock, M. J. (2018). “Pets negotiable”: How do the perspectives of landlords and property managers compare with those of younger tenants with dogs? Animals, 8(3), 32–45.
Growth From Knowledge. (2015). 61% of Canadians own a pet: GfK survey. Retrieved from https://www.gfk.com/en- us/press/61-of-canadians-own-a-pet-gfk-survey
Gruen, L. (2007). Empathy and vegetarian commitments. In J. Donovan & C. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 333–343). Columbia University Press.
Hanrahan, C. (2013). Social work and human animal bonds and benefits in health research: A provincial study. Critical Social Work, 14(1), 63–79. Retrieved from http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/system/files/ Hanrahan.pdf
Hart, L. A., & Mader, B. (1986). The successful introduction of pets into California public housing for the elderly. California Veterinarian, 40(5), 17–21.
Heart, K. (2019). Caring for Istanbul’s street animals: Empathy, altruism, and rage. In J. Sorenson & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human- canid relations (pp. 230–247). McGill & Queen University Press.
Hughes, M. J., Verreynne, M. L., Harpur, P., & Pachana, N.A. (2020). Companion animals and health in older populations: A systematic review. Clinical Gerontologist, 43(4), 365–377. doi:10.1080/07317115.2019.1650863
Huss, R. J. (2005). No pets allowed: Housing issues and companion animals. Animal Law Review, 69(11), 69–129.
Huss, R. J. (2014). Re-evaluating the role of companion animals in the era of the aging boomer. Akron Law Review, 497(2), 497–549.
Kheel, M. (2008). Nature ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Koenig, T. L., Leiste, M. R., Spano, R., & Chapin, R. K. (2013). Multidisciplinary team perspectives on older adult hoarding and mental illness. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 25(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566 .2012.712856
Kogan, L. R. (2001). Effective animal-intervention for long term care residents. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 25(1), 31–45.
Krause-Parello C.A., & Kolassa J. (2016). Pet therapy: Enhancing social and cardiovascular wellness in community dwelling older adults. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 33(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/07370016.20 16.1120587
Laing, M., & Maylea, C. (2018). “They burn brightly, but only for a short time”: The role of social workers in companion animal grief and loss. Anthrozoös, 31(2), 221–232. doi:1 0.1080/08927936.2018.1434062
Lambert, K., Coe, J., Niel, L., Dewey, C., & Sargeant, J. M. (2019). Companion-animal relinquishment: Exploration of the views expressed by primary stakeholders within published reviews and commentaries. Society and Animals, 1–22.
Le Roux, M., & Kemp, R. (2009). Effect of a companion dog on depression and anxiety levels of elderly residents in a long-term care facility. Psychogeriatrics, 9(1), 23–26. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8301.2009.00268.x
Mahalski, P. A., Jones, R., & Maxwell, G. M. (1988). The value of cat ownership to elderly women living alone. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 27(4), 249–260.
Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2013). Human consequences of animal exploitation: Needs for redefining social welfare. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XL(4), 7–32.
Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2014). Social justice beyond human beings: Trans-Species social justice, In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in social work: Why and how they matter (pp. 94–119). Palgrave Macmillan.
Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2018). Critical animal studies: Towards trans-species social justice. Rowman & Littlefield.
Matsuoka, A., Sorenson, J., Ferreira, J. T., Hanrahan, C., & Chalmers, D. (2019, June). Engaging in trans-species social justice through rethinking animal-human relations and challenging and transforming anthropocentric action. Paper presented at Canadian Association for Social Work Education, 57th Annual Conference, Vancouver.
McCreanor, M., McCreanor, S., & Utari, A. (2019). Connected and interconnected: Bali people and Bali dogs. In J. Sorenson & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human-canid relations (pp. 160–175). McGill & Queen University Press.
Morley, C., & Fook, J. (2005). The importance of pet loss and some implications for services. Mortality, 10, 127–143.
Nathanson J. (2009). Animal hoarding: Slipping into the darkness of comorbid animal and self-neglect. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 21(4), 307–324.
Netting, F. E., & Wilson, C. C. (1987). Restrictive leasing: Issues confronting the elderly and their companion animals. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 11(3–4), 181–189.
New, J. C., Salman, M. D., King, M., Scarlett, J. M., Kass, P. H., & Hutchison, J. M. (2000). Characteristics of shelter-relinquished animals and their owners compared
with animals and their owners in US pet-owning households. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 3(3), 179–201.
New, Jr., J. C., Salman, M. D., Scarlett, J. M., Kass, P. H., Vaughn, J. A., Scherr, S., & Kelch, W. J. (1999). Moving: Characteristics of dogs and cats and those relinquishing them to 12 US animal shelters. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2(2), 83–96.
Nibert, D. (2002). Animal rights/human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Rowman & Littlefield.
Nibert, D. (2013). Animal oppression & human violence: Domesecration, capitalism, and global conflict. Columbia University Press.
Nocella, A. J. II, Sorenson, J., Socha, K. & Matsuoka, A. (Eds.). (2014). Defining critical animal studies: An intersectional social justice approach. Peter Lang Publishing.
Noske, B. (1997). Beyond boundaries. Black Rose.
Peak, T., Ascione, F., & Doney, J. (2012). Adult protective series and animal welfare: Should animal abuse and neglect be assessed during adult protective services screening? Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 37–49.
Power, E. R. (2017). Renting with pets: a pathway to housing insecurity?. Housing Studies, 3037, 1–25.
Rauktis, M. E., Lee, H., Bickel, L., Giovengo, H., Nagel, M., & Cahalane, H. (2020). Food security challenges and health opportunities of companion animal ownership for low-income adults. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (United States). https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066 .2020.1781726
Risley-Curtiss, C. (2010). Social work practitioners and the human companion animal bond: national study. Social Work, 55(1), 38–47.
Rook, D. (2018). For the love of Darcie: Recognising the human–companion animal relationship in housing law and policy. The Liverpool Law Review, 39(1–2), 29–46.
Ryan, T. (2011). Animals and social work: A moral introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryder, R. (1983). Victims of science: The use of animals in research. National Anti-Vivisection Society.
Salman, M. D., New, Jr., J. G., Scarlett, J. M., Kass, P. H., Ruch-Gallie, R., & Hetts, S. (1998). Human and animal factors related to relinquishment of dogs and cats in 12 selected animal shelters in the United States. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0103_2
Shore, E. R., Petersen, C. L., & Douglas, D. K. (2003). Moving as a reason for pet relinquishment: A closer look. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(1), 39–52.
Singer, P. (1975 [1990]). Animal liberation. Ecco.
Smith, D. W., Seibert, C. S., Jackson III, F. W., & Snell, J. (1992). Pet ownership by elderly people: Two new issues. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34(3), 175–184.
Sorenson, J. (2010). Animal rights. Fernwood. Sorenson, J. (2014). Critical animal studies: Thinking the unthinkable. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Sorenson, J. (2016). Constructing ecoterrorism: Capitalism, speciesism & animal rights. Fernwood.
Sorenson, J., & Matsuoka, A. (Eds). (2019). Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human-canid relations. McGill & Queen University Press.
Toohey, A. M., Hewson, J. A., Adams, C. L., & Rock, M. J. (2017). When places include pets: Broadening the scope of relational approaches to promoting aging-in-place. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 44, 119–145.
Toohey, A. M., & Krahn, T. M. (2017). “Simply to be let in”: Opening the doors to lower-income older adults and their companion animals. Journal of Public Health, 40(3), 661–665.
Toohey, A. M., & Rock, M. J. (2019). Disruptive solidarity or solidarity disrupted? A dialogical narrative analysis of economically vulnerable older adults’ efforts to age in place with pets. Public Health Ethics, 12(1), 15–29.
Wallen, M. (2019). Well-bred is well-behaved: The creation and meaning of dog breeds. In J. Sorenson & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Dog’s best friend?: Rethinking human- canid relations (pp. 59–83). McGill & Queen University Press.
Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. Verso.
Wolf, D. B. (2000). Social work and speciesism. Social Work, 45(1), 88–93.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
