Social work disaster emergency response within a hospital setting
Keywords:canterbury earthquakes, christchurch earthquakes, disaster, emergency response, social work practice,
AbstractThis article outlines the social work contribution to a series of post-disaster emergency response interventions occurring in the Canterbury region between 2007 and 2012. While the earthquakes of September 4th 2010 and February 22nd 2011 provide the major focus for discussing the tasks and processes involved in emergency response interventions, an earlier critical incident involving a large number of youth prompted the development of the emergency response protocols. These protocols are discussed in light of the social work response to the Canterbury earthquakes. The challenges encountered through working in a rapidly changing physical and professional context are outlined including a discussion about the application of diverse forms of debriefing. New learning for social work practice derived out of engagement with emergency response work is summarised.
dead in hot air balloon tragedy (2012, January 7), The New Zealand Herald.
Atle, D., & Regel, S. (2012). Early interventions following exposure to traumatic events: Implications for practice from recent research. Journal of Loss and Trauma: International Perspectives on Stress and Coping, 17(3), 271-291.
Canterbury District Health Board. (2010). Christchurch Hospital Campus Emergency Procedures Volume B. Christchurch: Canterbury District Health Board.
Corin, C. (2011). The Christchurch Hospital social work service response in the first hours after the Christchurch earthquake of 22nd February 2011. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 23(3), 58-62.
Deahl, M., & Bisson, J. (1995). Dealing with disasters: Does psychological debriefing work? Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine, 12, 255-258.
Fook, J., Ryan, M., & Hawkins, L. (2000). Professional expertise. London: Whiting & Birch.
Jenson, J. (2005). Reflections on natural disasters and traumatic events. Social Work Research, 29, 195.
Kim, M., Sharman, R., Cook-Cottone, H., Rao, H., & Shambhu, J. (2012). Assessing roles of people, technology and structure in emergency management systems: A public sector perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31, 1147-1160
Kirsch, T., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Bissell, R., Sauer, L., Mahoney, M., Holmes, W., Santa Cruz, N., & Maza, F. (2010). Impact on hospital functions following the 2010 Chilean earthquake. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 4, 122-128
McLeese, D. (2008). Seeds scattered by Katrina: The dynamic of disaster and inspiration. Popular Music and Society, 31, 213-220
Milner, V. (2008). Rekindling the flame of community through compassion - a call for leadership toward compassionate community. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 20(3), 3-13.
New Zealand Fire Service Commission. (1998). The New Zealand Coordinated Incident Management System (CIMS). Teamwork in Emergency Management. Wellington: New Zealand Fire Service Commission.
Otera, M. (2012). What do music therapists need to know before the disaster strikes? Voices: A world forum for music therapy, 12(1) ISSN: 1504-1611.
Paine, M. (2005). Disaster debriefing pitfalls highlighted. Hobart Mercury. 5th April.
Sachdeva, S., & Levy, D. (2011, March 8th) 26,000 hit the road. The Press. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/5379410/26-000-hit-the-road-after-quake.
van Heugten, K. (2011). Social work under pressure: How to overcomestress, fatigue and burnoutin the workplace. London. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Wang, L., Chan, C., Shi, B., & Wang, B. (2013). Mental health risks in the local workforce engaged in disaster relief and reconstruction. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 207.
Whelan, J. (1998). A social work perspective on the response to the Port Arthur Crisis. Australian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 52-54.
Worst mining disaster in years. (2003, November 5), The Dominion Post, pA1.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.