Re-writing the “rules of engagement”: Using critical reflection to examine ableist social work practice

Jessica Fox

Abstract


INTRODUCTION: Normative beliefs and practices reaffirm a hegemonic construction of human ability that legitimises the socio-cultural status quo. This disenfranchises people with diverse abilities who are excluded from this construction whilst simultaneously normalising the structural inequality and oppression that they experience. Helping professions such as social work often provide support to people who are disadvantaged by these social structures. However, practitioners within these fields are not immune to the influence of socio-cultural norms, therefore it is essential for them to reflect on the ways in which they might reproduce them within their practice.

APPROACH: This article outlines my experience of using critical reflection as a research methodology to examine an incident from my practice. Deconstruction and reconstruction methods were used to analyse the normative assumptions within my construction of this incident.

REFLECTIONS: The deconstruction analysis revealed how assumptions about impairment within my account of the incident were underpinned by ableist discourses. Reconstructing this through a neurodiversity lens enabled me to generate new insights around the anti-oppressive potential for using a pluralistic approach that undermines hegemonic constructions of ability.

CONCLUSIONS: By critically reflecting on this incident, I realised the importance of challenging normative assumptions when practising within neoliberal contexts where socio-cultural hegemony is amplified.


Keywords


Critical reflection; social work; ableism; neurodiversity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armstrong, T. (2015). The myth of the normal brain: Embracing neurodiversity. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(4), 348–352. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504

Bathje, M., Lannoye, M., Mercier, A., & Panter, K. (2018). A review of occupation-based life skills interventions for adults with neurodevelopmental disorders. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 34(2), 165–180. doi:10.1080/0 164212X.2017.1360168.

Bayliss, P. (2009). Against interpretosis: Deleuze, disability, and difference. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(3), 281–294,305. doi:10.1353/jlc.0.0023

Bigby, C. (2012). Social inclusion and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 37(4), 360–374. doi:10.3109/13668250.2012.721878

Burgers, C., & Beukeboom, C. (2016). Stereotype transmission and maintenance through interpersonal communication: The irony bias. Communication Research, 43(3), 414–441. doi:10.1177/0093650214534975

Chomsky, N., & Foucault, M. (2011). Human nature justice versus power: The Chomsky/Foucault debate. Souvenir Press.

Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh University Press.

Daley, A. (2010). Reflections on reflexivity and critical reflection as critical research practices. Affilia, 25(1), 68–82. doi:10.1177/0886109909354981

Den-Houting, J. (2019). Neurodiversity: An insider’s perspective. Autism, 23(2), 271–273. doi:10.1177/1362361318820762

Dinishak, J. (2016). The deficit view and its critics. Disability Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 5. doi:10.18061/dsq. v36i4.5236.

Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2018). Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–8. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1 498546

Edwards, C., & Imrie, R. (2003). Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology, 37(2), 239–256. doi:10.1177 /0038038503037002002

Ellem, K., O’Connor, M., Wilson, J., & Williams, S. (2013). Social work with marginalised people who have a mild or borderline intellectual disability: Practicing gentleness and encouraging hope. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 56–71. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2012.710244.

Ellem, K., & Richards, K. (2018). Police contact with young people with cognitive disabilities: Perceptions of procedural (in)justice. Youth Justice, 18(3), 230–247. doi:10.1177/1473225418794357

Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection: A resource handbook. Open University Press.

Foucault, M. (1974). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Vintage Books.

Garrett, P. (2010). Examining the “Conservative Revolution”: Neoliberalism and social work education. Social Work Education, 29(4), 340–355. doi:10.1080/02615470903009015

Gray, M. (2010). Moral sources and emergent ethical theories in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40(6), 1794–1811. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp104

Gwilym, H. (2018). Social work, neoliberalism and authoritarianism: An analysis of the policy document “Regulating Social Workers.” Critical and Radical Social Work, 6(3), 407–413. doi:10.1332/20498601 8X15388226259290

Hallahan, L. (2010). Legitimising social work disability policy practice: Pain or praxis? Australian Social Work, 63(1), 117-132. doi: 10.1080/03124070903515458

Haney, J. (2018). Reconceptualizing autism: An alternative paradigm for social work practice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 29(1), 61–80. doi:10.1080/10428232. 2017.1394689

Haney, J., & Cullen, J. (2018). An exploratory investigation of social workers’ knowledge and attitudes about autism. Social Work in Mental Health, 16 (2), 201–222. doi:10.1080/15332985.2017.1373265

Hyslop, I. (2018). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31. doi:10.1 080/13691457.2016.1255927

Ivanov, M., & Werner, P. (2010). Behavioral communication: Individual differences in communication style. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(1), 19–23. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.033

Krcek, T. (2013). Deconstructing disability and neurodiversity: Controversial issues for autism and implications for social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 24(1), 4–22. doi:10.1080/10428232.2013.740406

Leveto, J. (2018). Toward a sociology of autism and neurodiversity. Sociology Compass, 12(12), 1–17. doi:10.1111/soc4.12636

Lollini, A. (2018). Brain equality: Legal implications of neurodiversity in a comparative perspective. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 51(1). http://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ NYI102.pdf

Masataka, N. (2017). Implications of the idea of neurodiversity for understanding the origins of developmental disorders. Physics of Life Reviews, 20, 85–108. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2016.11.002

May, W. (1980). Doing ethics: The bearing of ethical theories on fieldwork. Social Problems, 27(3), 358–370. doi:10.2307/800254

McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. doi:10.1177/1536504212456175

Mladenov, T. (2015). Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability. Disability & Society, 30(3), 445–459. doi:10.1080/09687 599.2015.1021758

Morley, C. (2008). Developing critical reflection as a research methodology. In P. Liamputtong & J. Rumbold (Eds.), Knowing differently: An introduction to experiential and arts-based research methods (pp. 265–280). Nova Science.

Morley, C. (2012). How does critical reflection develop possibilities for emancipatory change? An example from an empirical research project. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1513–1532. doi:10.1093/bjsw/ bcr153

Morley, C. (2014). Using critical reflection to research possibilities for change. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1419–1435. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct004

Morley, C. (2016). Promoting activism through critical social work education: The impact of global capitalism and neoliberalism on social work and social work education. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4(1), 39–57. doi:10.133 2/204986016X14519919041398

Muskat, B. (2017). Celebrating neurodiversity: An often- overlooked difference in group work. Social Work with Groups: Group Work Stories Celebrating Diversity, 40(12), 81–84. doi:10.1080/01609513.2015.1067131

O’Connor, M. (2014). The National Disability Insurance Scheme and people with mild intellectual disability: Potential pitfalls for consideration. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(1), 17–23. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2014.908815

Oerther, S., & Oerther, D. (2018). Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice offers nurses a framework to uncover embodied knowledge of patients living with disabilities or illnesses: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(4), 818–826. doi:10.1111/jan.13486

Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability and Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. doi:10.108 0/09687599.2013.818773

Owens, J. (2015). Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt’s notion of power. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3), 385–403. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12199

Parker Harris, S., Owen, R., & Gould, R. (2012). Parity of participation in liberal welfare states: Human rights, neoliberalism, disability and employment. Disability & Society, 27(6), 823–836. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012. 679022

Pease, B. (2009). From evidence-based practice to critical knowledge in post-positivist social work. In J. Allan, L. Briskman, & B. Pease (Eds.), Critical social work: Theories and practices for a socially just world (2nd ed., pp. 45–67). Allen & Unwin.

Phutela, D. (2015). The importance of non-verbal communication. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 9(4), 43–49. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1759007009/

Purcell, E. (2014). Oppression’s three new faces: Rethinking Iris Young’s “Five Faces of Oppression” for disability theory. In S. Asumah & M. Nagel (Eds.), Diversity, social justice, and inclusive excellence: Transdisciplinary and global perspectives (pp. 185–206). State University of New York Press.

Sarrett, J (2017). Interviews, disclosures, and misperceptions: Autistic adults’ perspectives on employment related challenges. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 6. doi:10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5524

Singh, G., & Cowden, S. (2015). The intensification of neoliberalism and the commodification of human need – A social work perspective. Critical and Radical Social Work, 3(3), 375–387. doi:10.1332/20498601 5X14417170590709

Spies-Butcher, B., & Chester, L. (2014). Marketisation and the dual welfare state: Neoliberalism and inequality in Australia. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 25(2), 185–201. doi:10.1177/1035304614530076

Wallace, J., Pease, B., Noble, C., & Henrickson, M. (2011). Neoliberalism and Australian social work: Accommodation or resistance? Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 132–142. doi:10.1177/1468017310387318

Wiegmann, W. (2017). Habitus, symbolic violence, and reflexivity: Applying Bourdieu’s theories to social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 44(4), 95–116.

Young, I. (2014). Five faces of oppression. In S. Asumah & M. Nagel (Eds.), Diversity, social justice, and inclusive excellence: Transdisciplinary and global perspectives (pp. 3–33). State University of New York Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss1id822

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.