Animal abuse and family violence: Reflections from workshopping with veterinary students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss1id827Keywords:
animal abuse, family violence, veterinary science education,Abstract
The notion of social work teaching in the veterinary science programme may seem novel for our profession. However, the philosophy underlying the context of animal and human welfare in One Health is the result of the collaborative effort of multiple disciplines and professions to attain optimal health for people, animals and the environment. One Health emphasises some of the key domains such as creating an enabling environment and advocating change and communication amongst healthcare professionals (Courtenay et al., 2014). Even when interprofessional education (IPE) and One Health competencies are evident in courses, Courtenay and colleagues (2014) noted that they are mostly at clinical level. In recent years, there has been a call for more collaboration between human and veterinary medicine to learn and practise One Health competencies, and “links” between the abuse of children, vulnerable adults and animals have been identified as a key area for exploration (Arkow, 2015a; Jordan & Lem, 2014). In 2015, the second author and the Head of School of Social Work at Massey University had the opportunity to skype with Dr Elizabeth Strand, the Founding Director of Veterinary Social Work (VSW) (Strand et al., 2012), from University of Tennessee-Knoxville to discuss setting up VSW and also to seek advice
on challenges and strategies on engaging and collaborating with the veterinary school. Dr Strand shared her experiences and encouraged us to contact the Head of the Veterinary School at our university to start a conversation. Our Head of School approached the then Head of School of Veterinary Science and within days a meeting was organised. We went into the meeting expecting a first level of exploration with the Head of School to see if he was interested but were surprised when we were joined by another senior lecturer (SG) who had been re-designing the course content of professional practice for veterinarian students. He was very keen of our idea on working with him to develop a module on teaching his students about the link between animal abuse and family violence. It seemed the Veterinary School hadbeen identifying gaps in their curriculum for some time in relation to health and wellbeing, communication skills and conflict resolution, but they had only accessed support from student health services at the university. He also acknowledged the increasing attention in research literature about the link between human and animal violence as a pivotal area that could be integrated within the Veterinary Science Professional Practice curriculum, but did not realise that social work could play a role in supporting their curriculum and knowledge building. The meeting was a success, and within a year, we started our contribution by running the first two-hour workshop with first-year veterinary students discussing animal abuse and family violence, a workshop which then became a regular feature of the veterinary programme between 2016 and 2018. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of what was included in the educational contexts, reflections from veterinary students’ engagement and future needs to connect between human service and animal service professionals to address the link.
References
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2019). Code of ethics 2019. https://anzasw.nz/wp- content/uploads/ANZASW-Code-of-Ethics-Final-1- Aug-2019.pdf
Arkow, P. (2015a). A link across the lifespan: Animal abuse as a marker for traumatic experiences in child abuse, domestic violence and elder abuse. Academy on Violence and Abuse. https://avahealthorg.presencehost. net/file_download/inline/b64aff80-5461-4d9b-9cdc- cf9b47f30174
Arkow, P. (2015b). Recognizing and responding to cases of suspected animal cruelty, abuse, and neglect: What the veterinarian needs to know. Veterinary Medicine: Research & Report, 6, 349–359.
Arkow, P. (2020). Human-animal relationships and social work: Opportunities beyond the veterinary environment. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10560-020-00697-x
Armitage-Chan, E. (2020). Best practice in supporting professional identity formation: Use of a professional reasoning framework. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(2), 125–136.
Armitage-Chan, E., & May, S. A. (2018). Developing a professional studies curriculum to support veterinary professional identity formation. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 45(4), 489–501.
Ascione, F., Weber, C. V., & Wood, D. S. (1997). The abuse of animals and domestic violence: A national survey of shelters for women who are battered. Society and Animals, 5(3), 205–218.
Atwool, N. (2020). Care and protection/family violence: Aotearoa New Zealand. Children Australia, 45, 5–7.
Benetato, M.A., Reisman, R., & McCobb, E. (2011). The veterinarian’s role in animal cruelty cases. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 238, 31–34.
Bikales, G. (1975). The dog as “significant other”. Social Work, 20(2), 150–152.
Bright, M.A., Huq, M.S., Spencer, T., Applebaum, J.W., & Hardt, N. (2018). Animal cruelty as an indicator of family trauma: Using adverse childhood experiences to look beyond child abuse and domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 76, 289–296.
Courtenay, M., Wilkes, M., Conrad, P. A., La Ragione, R., & Reeves, S. (2014). One Health: The importance of education and the impact of interprofessional interventions. The Veterinary Journal, 201, 241–242.
Donley, L., Patronek, G. J., & Luke, C. (1999). Animal abuse in Massachusetts: A summary of case reports at the MSPCA and attitudes of Massachusetts veterinarians. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2, 59–73.
Family Violence Death Review Committee. (2017). Family Violence Death Review Committee’s fifth report data – Media summary. Family Violence Death Review Committee.
Faver, C., & Strand (2003). Domestic violence and animal cruelty. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(2), 237–253.
Febres, J., Brasfield, H., Shorey, R. C., Elmquist, J., Ninnemann, A., Schonbrun, Y. C., Temple, J. R., Recupero, P. R., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). Adulthood animal abuse among men arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 20(9), 1059–1077.
Green, P. C., & Gullone, E. (2005). Knowledge and attitude of Australian veterinarians to animal abuse and human interpersonal violence. Australian Veterinary Journal, 83(10), 619–625.
Grimm, H., Bergadano, A., Musk, G. C., Otto, K., Taylor, P., & Duncan, J. C. (2018). Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: Recommendations from an ethics working party. The Veterinary Record, 182(23), 664–671.
Haden, S. C., McDonald, S. E., Booth, L. J., Ascione, F. R., & Blakelock, H. (2018). An exploratory study of domestic violence: Perpetrators’ reports of violence against animals. Anthrozoös, 31(3), 337–352.
Holcombe, T. M., Strand, E. B., Nugent, W. R. & Ng, Z. Y. (2016). Veterinary social work: Practice within veterinary settings. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environmen., doi:10.1080/10911359.2015.1059170
Hugman, R. (2008). An ethical perspective on social work. In M. Davies (3rd ed.). The Blackwell companion to social work (pp. 442–448). Blackwell Publishing.
Jordan, T., & Lem, M. (2014). One Health, One Welfare: Education in practice. Veterinary students’ experiences with community veterinary outreach. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 55(12), 1203–1206.
Lachance, M. (2016). Breaking the silence: The veterinarian’s duty to report. Animal Sentience, 6(1).
Legge, M. M., & Robinson, M. (2017). Animals in indigenous spiritualities: Implications for critical social work. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, 6(1), 1–20.
Litchfield, A., Frawley, J., & Nettleton, S. (2010). Contextualising and integrating into the curriculum the learning and teaching of work-ready professional graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 519–534.
Lockwood, R., & Arkow, P. (2016). Animal abuse and interpersonal violence: The cruelty connection and its implications for veterinary pathology. Veterinary Pathology, 53, 910–918.
Long, D., Long, J., & Kulkarni, S. (2007). Interpersonal violence and animals: Mandated cross-sector reporting. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, XXXIV(3), 147–163.
McGinnis, A., Tesarek Kincaid, A., Barrett, M. J., Ham, C., & Community Elders Research Advisory Group. (2019). Strengthening animal-human relationships as a doorway to indigenous holistic wellness. Ecopsychology, 11(3), 162–173.
Mullan, S., & Main D. (2001). Principles of ethical decision- making in veterinary practice. In Practice, 23(7), 394–401.
National Link Coalition. (2019). The connection between animal cruelty and societal violence and vulnerability. LINK-Letter, 12(12), 9–10.
Newberry, M. (2017). Pets in danger: Exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 34, 273–281.
Newland, X., Boller, M., & Boller, E. (2019). Considering the relationship between domestic violence and pet abuse and its significance in the veterinary clinical and educational contexts. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 67(2), 55–65.
Pinillos, R. G., Appleby, M. C., Manteca, X., Scott-Park, F., Smith, C., & Velarde, A. (2016). One welfare – A platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record, 179, 412–413.
Randour, M. L., Smith-Blackmore, M., Blaney, N., DeSousa, D., & Guyony, A. (2019). Animal abuse as a type of trauma: Lessons for human and animal service professionals. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838019843197
Robertson, I. (2010). Legally protecting and compelling veterinarians in issues of animal abuse and domestic violence. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 58(3), 114–120.
Roguksi, M. (2012). Pets as pawns: The co-existence of animal cruelty and family violence. http:// nationallinkcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ DV-PetsAsPawnsNZ.pdf
Signal, T., Taylor, N., Burke, K. J., & Brownlow, L. (2018). Double jeopardy: Insurance, animal harm, and domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 24(6), 718–726.
Strand, E. B., Poe, B. A., Lyall, S., Yorke, J., Nimer, J., Allen, E., Brown, G., & Nolen-Pratt, T. (2012). Veterinary social work practice. In C. Dulmus & K. Sowers (Eds.). Social work: Fields of practice (pp. 245–271). John Wiley & Sons.
Szucs, E., Geers, R., Jezierski, T., Sossidou, E. N., & Broom, D. M. (2012). Animal welfare in different human cultures, traditions and religious faiths. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25(11), 1499–1506.
Tzioumis, V., Freire, R., Hood, J., Johnson, A. J., Lloyd, J., Phillips, C. J. C., & McGreevy, P. D. (2018). Educators’ perspectives on animal welfare and ethics in the Australian and New Zealand veterinary curricula. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 45(4), 448–463.
Veterinary Council of New Zealand. (2020). Code of professional conduct for veterinarians. https://www. vetcouncil.org.nz/Web/Code_of_Professional_Conduct/ Code_Of_Conduct.aspx
Veterinary Council Working Party. (2013). Guidance for veterinarians: Dealing with cases of suspected or actual animal abuse and family violence. https://www. vetcouncil.org.nz/Web/Publications/Type/Guidelines_ and_Standards.aspx
Volant, A. M., Johnson, J. A., Gullone, E. & Coleman, J. (2008). The relationship between domestic violence and animal abuse: An Australian study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9), 1277–1295.
Williams, V., Dale, A., Clarke, N. & Garrett, N. (2008). Animal abuse and family violence: Survey on the recognition of animal abuse by veterinarians in New Zealand and their understanding of the correlation between animal abuse and human violence. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 56(1), 21–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
