Mitigating barriers to addiction recovery in Aotearoa New Zealand: A lived experience perspective

Authors

  • Rachel Victoria Jowett Massey University, Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Michael Dale Massey University, Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Lareen Cooper Massey University, Aotearoa New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss2id866

Keywords:

Addiction, New Zealand, social work, lived experience, recovery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The New Zealand government’s health surveys consistently identify that alcohol and other drug (AOD) addiction is an issue for New Zealanders. However, there is a lack of qualitative research on the lived experiences of health and social service professionals who have previous or current experience of AOD addiction in Aotearoa New Zealand.

METHODS: A constructivist approach was utilised, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and subsequent thematic analysis identified themes highlighting what contributed, and created barriers to, participants’ successful AOD addiction recovery.

FINDINGS: Identification of nine themes illustrated that the barriers to AOD addiction recovery in Aotearoa New Zealand experienced by the research participants were systemic and preventable.

CONCLUSIONS: The recommendation of this research is that the lived experience of people who have experienced AOD addiction in Aotearoa New Zealand is better utilised in order to mitigate, and enhance, identified barriers, and contributors to, successful AOD addiction recovery.

References

Adams, P. J. (2016). Switching to a social approach to addiction: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9588-4

Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. SAGE.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2007). Code of ethics. https://anzasw.nz/wp-content/ uploads/Code-of-Ethics.pdf

Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. Sage Publications.

Bassuk, E. L., Hanson, J., Greene, R. N., Richard, M., & Laudet, A. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 63, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.003

Boisvert, R. A., Martin, L. M., Grosek, M., & Clarie, A. J. (2008). Effectiveness of a peer-support community in addiction recovery: Participation as intervention. Occupational Therapy International, 15(4), 205–220.

Brener, L., Von Hippel, W., Von Hippel, C., Resnick, I., & Treloar, C. (2010). Perceptions of discriminatory treatment by staff as predictors of drug treatment completion: Utility of a mixed methods approach. Drug & Alcohol Review, 29(5), 491–497.

Broom, A., & Willis, E. (2007). Competing paradigms and health research. In M. Saks & J. Allsop (Eds.), Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. (pp. 16–31). Sage Publications.

Butler, R., & Sheridan, J. (2010). Innocent parties or devious drug users: The views of primary healthcare practitioners with respect to those who misuse prescription drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 7(21). https://doi. org10.1186/1477-7517-7-21

Butler, T., Indig, D., Allnutt, S., & Mamoon, H. (2011). Co- occurring mental illness and substance use disorder among Australian prisoners. Drug & Alcohol Review, 30(2), 188–194.

Christie, G., Merry, S., & Robinson, E. (2010). Do young people attending addiction services differ from those attending youth mental health services?. Drug & Alcohol Review, 29(4), 406–412.

Clarke, K., Harris, D., Zweifler, J. A., Lasher, M., Mortimer, R. B., & Hughes, S. (2016). The significance of harm reduction as a social and health care intervention for injecting drug users: An exploratory study of a needle exchange program in Fresno California. Social Work in Public Health, 31(5), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2015.1137522

Clear, T. R., & Schrantz, D. (2011). Strategies for reducing prison populations. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 138–159.

Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.818

Copello, A., Templeton, L., & Powell, J. (2010). The impact of addiction on the family: Estimates of prevalence and costs. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(1), 63–71.

Corcoran, J., & Walsh, J. (Eds.). (2010). Clinical assessment and diagnosis in social work practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Csiernik, R., & Rowe, W. S. (Eds.). (2003). Responding to the oppression of addiction: Canadian social work perspectives. Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Davis, C., & Boddington, D. (2015). Teenage cardiac arrest following abuse of synthetic cannabis. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 24(10), 162–163. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. hlc.2015.04.176

Deering, D., Horn, J., & Frampton, C. M. A. (2012). Clients perceptions of opioid substitution treatment: An input to improving the quality of treatment. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(4), 330–339. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00795.x

Deering, D. E. A., Sheridan, J., Sellman, J. D., Adamson, S. J., Pooley, S., Robertson, R., & Henderson, C. (2011). Consumer and treatment provider perspectives on reducing barriers to opioid substitution treatment and improving treatment attractiveness. Addictive Behaviors, 36(6), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addbeh.2011.01.004

Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 170–196.

Engel, R., & Schutt, R. (2005). The practice of research in social work. Sage Publishing.

Ministry of Health. (2018). Mental Health and Addiction Workforce Action Plan 2017–2021 (2nd ed.). Author.

Watson, C. (2005, May). Living the life of the social inquirer: Beginning educational research. [Paper presentation]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.

Webster, J., & Bosmann-Wātene, G. (2003). Walking in two worlds: A critique of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders from a perspective of Te Ao Māori. Social Work Review, 15(3), 8–11.

Wiens, T. K., & Walker, L. J. (2015). The chronic disease concept of addiction: Helpful or harmful? Addiction Research & Theory, 23(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.987760

World Health Organisation. (2005). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/ browse/2016/en

Downloads

Published

2021-09-02

How to Cite

Jowett, R. V., Dale, M., & Cooper, L. (2021). Mitigating barriers to addiction recovery in Aotearoa New Zealand: A lived experience perspective. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 33(2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss2id866

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Original Articles I

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.

You and any co-authors

If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.

First publication

By submitting the work you are:

  1. granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
  2. confirming that the work is original; and
  3. confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.

Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.

Copyright

You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.

The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.

A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.

Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.

This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.

Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.

The copyright of others

If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:

  1. falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
  2. that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.