Registered social workers' supervision across areas of practice in Aotearoa New Zealand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id878Keywords:
supervision, areas of practice, survey, Aotearoa New ZealandAbstract
INTRODUCTION: This article examines the supervisory experiences and views of registered social workers across the practice areas of statutory services, health and non-government organisations (NGOs.) The article aims to establish a baseline for supervision across areas of practice in Aotearoa New Zealand and discuss the implications any differences have for the supervision of registered social workers.
METHODS: Demographic data from 266 postal survey respondents was descriptively analysed. A one-way ANOVA and Tamhane T2 post hoc tests were applied using IBM SPSS 24 to explore variances in means for the independent variable of Area of Practice across 10 scales about the respondents’ supervision experiences.
FINDINGS: Differences were identified in the workforce profile of each area, and there were significant differences in supervisees’ experiences of supervision across areas of practice which reflected each area’s different supervision culture, policy, and practices. The findings show that supervision in health and NGO areas was more professional, clinical, cultural, reflective and involved more positive content within a more constructive supervision climate than supervision in the statutory area.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference was found between the quality of supervision experienced by social workers in health and NGOs and their statutory social work colleagues. This needs to be addressed through changing the supervision climate, developing supervisor capability and the uncluttering of supervision through separating professional/clinical supervision from line management. This study provides a foundation for further research that compares supervision across practice areas.
References
Beddoe, L., Ferguson, H., Warwick, L., Disney, T., Leigh, J., & Cooner, T. S. (2021). Supervision in child protection: a space and place for reflection or an excruciating marathon of compliance? European Journal of Social Work. https://doi:10.1080/13691457.2021.1964443
Benton, A. D., Dill, K., & Williams, A. E. (2017). Sacred time: Ensuring the provision of excellent supervision.
Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 32(4), 290-305. https://doi:10.1080/15555240.2017.1408416
Bostock, L., Patrizo, L., Godfrey, T., & Forrester, D. (2019). What is the impact of supervision on direct practice with families? Children and Youth Services Review, 105, 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104428
Bostock, L., Patrizo, L., Godfrey, T., Munro, E., & Forrester, D. (2019). How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.027
Davys, A. (2002). Perceptions through a prism: Three accounts of good social work supervision [Unpublished Master’s thesis, Massey University]. http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5754
De Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Allen and Unwin.
Dill, K., & Bogo, M. (2009). Moving beyond the administrative: Supervisors’ perspectives on clinical supervision in child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 87–105.
Field, J. 2008. Rethinking supervision and shaping future practice. Social Work Now, 40, 11–18.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Geißler-Piltz, B. (2011). How social workers experience supervision: Results of an empirical study in the healthcare sector. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 5–22. http://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.246
Hawkins, P., & McMahon, A. (2020). Supervision in the helping professions (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Open University Press.
Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, L., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 630–660.
Henrickson, M., Neville, S., Jordan, C., & Donaghey, S. (2007). Lavender Islands. Journal of Homosexuality, 53(4), 223–248. https://doi:10.1080/00918360802103514.
Hyslop, I. K. (2021). Child protection reform in Aotearoa- New Zealand: Devolution or revolution? International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice. https://doi:10.1007/s42448-021-00086-6
Julien-Chinn, F. J., & Lietz, C. A. (2015). Permanency- focused supervision and workers’ self-efficacy: Exploring the link. Social Work, 61(1), 37–44. https://doi:10.1093/sw/swv043
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work, (5th ed.). Columbia University Press.
Lietz, C. A., & Julien-Chinn, F. J. (2017). Do the components of strengths-based supervision enhance child welfare workers’ satisfaction with supervision? Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 98(2), 146–155. https://doi:10.1606/1044-3894.2017.98.20
McPherson, L., Frederico, M., & McNamara, P. (2016). Safety as a fifth dimension in supervision: Stories from the frontline. Australian Social Work, 69(1), 67–79. https://doi:10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024265
Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care (3rd ed.). Pavilion.
O’Donoghue, K. (2010). Towards the construction of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand: A study
of the perspectives of social work practitioners and supervisors [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massey University. http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/1535
O’Donoghue, K. (2019a). The supervision of registered social workers in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national survey. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 58–77. https://doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id648
O’Donoghue, K. (2019b). Registered social workers who are supervisors: A national survey. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 97–115. https://doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id651
O’Donoghue, K. (2021). Advancing the social work supervision research agenda. In K. O’Donoghue, & L.K. Engelbrecht (Eds.). The Routledge international handbook of social work supervision (pp.637–656). Routledge.
O’Donoghue, K., Munford, R., & Trlin, A. (2005). Mapping the territory: Supervision within the association. Social Work Review 17(4), 46–64.
O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. (2012). Towards a professional supervision culture: The development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1), 5–28. https://doi:10.1177/0020872810396109
O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M., (2015). Social work supervision research (1970–2010): The way we were and the way ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616–633. https://doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct115
O’Donoghue, K., Wong Yuh Ju, P., & Tsui, MS. (2018). Constructing an evidence-informed social work supervision model. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 348–358. https://doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1341387
Office of the Ombudsman. (2020). He Take KoKo hukihuki: A matter of urgency. https://www.ombudsman. parliament.nz/sites/default/files/2021-11/He%20 Take%20K%C5%8Dhukihuki%20-%20A%20Matter%20 of%20Urgency.pdf
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival guide (5th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
Rankine, M. (2019). The internal/external debate: The tensions within social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id646
Rankine, M., Beddoe, L., O’Brien, M., & Fouché, C. (2018). What’s your agenda? Reflective supervision in community-based child welfare services. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 428–440. https://doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1326376
Rankine, M., & Thompson, A. (2021). “Moving out of the safe zone”: Promoting learning communities and reflective supervision in a social work statutory child protection agency. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 33(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss2id871
Robinson, K. (2013). Supervision found wanting: experiences of health and social workers in non- government organisations working with refugees and asylum seekers. Practice, 25(2), 87–103. https://doi:10.1080/09503153.2013.775238
Saltiel, D. (2017). Supervision: A contested space for learning and decision making. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 533–549. https://doi:10.1177/1473325016633445
Sauder, D. C., & DeMars, C. E. (2019). An updated recommendation for multiple comparisons. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808784
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of Coefficient Alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353.
Scott, D., & Farrow, J. (1993). Evaluating standards of social work supervision in child welfare and hospital social work. Australian Social Work, 46(2), 33–41.
Sewell, K. M. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265. https://doi:10.1007/s10615-018-0679-0.
Sewell, K. M., Kao, D., & Asakura, K. (2021). Clinical supervision in frontline health care: A survey of social workers in Ontario, Canada. Social Work in Health Care, https://doi:10.1080/00981389.2021.1880532
Shepherd, S. (2003). An exploratory study of social work supervision and the health sector [Master’s thesis] University of Canterbury.
Social Workers Registration Board, (2015a). Annual report presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 150 of the Crown Entities Act 2004, 2014–2015, http://swrb.govt.nz/download/swrb-annual- report-2014-2015/
Social Workers Registration Board. (2015b) Supervision expectations for registered social workers: Policy statement. http://swrb.govt.nz/download/supervision- expectations-for-registered-social-workers/
Statistics New Zealand. (2013). 2013 Census definitions and forms. https://cdm20045.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/ collection/p20045coll32/id/2295/rec/2
Statistics New Zealand. (2021). Gender, sex, variations of sex characteristics, and sexual identity. https://www. stats.govt.nz/reports/gender-sex-variations-of-sex- characteristics-and-sexual-identity
Tsui, M. S., O’Donoghue, K., Boddy, J., & Pak, C. M. (2017). From supervision to organisational learning: A typology to integrate supervision, mentorship, consultation and coaching. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2406–2420. https://doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx006
Waitangi Tribunal. (2021). He Paharakeke, he Rito Whakakıkınga Wharuarua: Oranga Tamariki urgent inquiry– Pre-publication version. https://forms.justice. govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_171027305/ He%20Paharakeke%20W.pdf
Wilkins, D., Forrester, D., & Grant, L. (2017). What happens in child and family social work supervision? Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 942–951. https://doi:10.1111/cfs.12314
Wilkins, D., Lynch, A., & Antonopoulou, V. (2018). A golden thread? The relationship between supervision, practice, and family engagement in child and family social work. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 494–503. https://doi:10.1111/cfs.12442
Young, G. (1994). Critical components in the supervision of child protection social workers in a statutory agency. Social Work Review, 6 (5/6), 23–29.
Zinn, A. (2015). A typology of supervision in child welfare: Multilevel latent class and confirmatory analyses
of caseworker–supervisor relationship type. Children and Youth Services Review, 48(1), 98–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
