Tawaf – cleansing our souls: A model of supervision for Muslims
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol33iss3id890Keywords:
Kaitiakitanga, Islam, nafs, tawaf, rangahau, supervisionAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Cultural supervision with Māori (tangata whenua) in social work has been a focus of practice in Aotearoa New Zealand. New approaches to address the cultural needs of Māori social workers and those of other cultural backgrounds have been developed. This article portrays a model of cultural supervision for Muslim social workers in Aotearoa.
APPROACH: The broader methodological structure of this reflective account is a kaupapa Māori framework and Rangahau (a Wānanga response to research). Rangahau is the traditional Māori methodology of inquiry utilising mātauranga Māori and āhuatanga Māori – traditional Māori bodies of knowledge from the context of a Māori world view. Critical self-reflection and use of reflective journals are used as methods of the rangahau.
FINDINGS: A model of supervision is presented which is tawaf, a ritual of haj – one of the pillars of Islam. Muslims (who follow Islam as a religion) perform haj (pilgrimage) to receive hedayet (spiritual guidance) to cleanse their nafs (soul). In this model, the phases of tawaf have been applied to structure and guide social work supervision sessions designed for Muslim social workers. Some important values of Islam such as tawbah, sabr, shukr, tawakkul, and takwa, have been integrated into the model as every action of Muslims is value-based. The model combines both nafs and a value-based approach in supervision.
IMPLICATIONS: Tawaf represents the Islamic worldview and aims to deconstruct and reconstruct supervisees’ practice and assumptions. This will be used in the context of cultural supervision with Muslim social workers by Muslim supervisors.
References
Abdullah, S. (2015). An Islamic perspective for strengths-based social work with Muslim clients. Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 29(2), 163–172.
Akhter, S. (2015). Reimagining teaching as a social work educator: A critical reflection. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 17(1), 39–51.
Akhter, S. (2016). Reclaiming an Islamic framework for social work. Wāhia Ngā Ngaru: Framework of Being – old friends in new times, 1(1), 165–175.
Alias, A (2005). Statistics from an Islamic perspective [Paper presentation]. International Conference of social science research methods and conference of Quantitative Sciences and Its Application, Faculty of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia.
Alias, A., & Samsudin, M. Z. (2005, September 10-12). Psychology of motivation from an Islamic perspective [Paper presentation]. 3rd International Seminar on Learning and Motivation presented at City Bayview Hotel, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia.
Beddoe, L. (2011). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197–213. https://doi:10.1080/031240 7x.2011.591187
Beddoe, L. (2015). Supervision and developing the profession: One supervision or many? China Journal of Social Work, 8(2),150–163. https://doi:10.1080/1752509 8.2015.1039173
Besley, T., & Peters, M. A. (2020). Terrorism, trauma, tolerance: Bearing witness to white supremacist attack on Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(2), 109–119. https://doi 10.1080/00131857.2019.1602891
Bishop, R. (1996). Collaborative research stories. Dunmore Press.
Boulton, A., Hudson, M., & Ahiriri- Driscoll. (2014). Enacting Kaitiakitanga: Challenges and complexities in the governance and ownership of Rongoa research information. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(2), Art 1.
Bradley, J., Jacob, E., & Bradley, R. (1999). Reflections on culturally safe supervision, or why Bill Gates makes more money than we do. Te Komako Social Work Review, 1(4), 3–6.
Brenner, M., & Homonoff, E. (2004). Zen and clinical social work: A spiritual approach to practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85(2), 261–269. https://doi:10.1606/1044-3894.315
Cader, A. (2016). Towards an Islamic model of work motivation. International Discourse, 24(1), 83–109.
Eketone, A. ( 2012). The purpose of cultural supervision. Aoteaoroa New Zealand Social Work Review, 24(3), 20–30.
Elkington, J. (2014). A Kaupapa Māori supervision context – cultural and professional. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 26(1), 65–73.
Fook, J. (1999). Critical reflectivity in education and practice. In B. Pease & J. Fook (Eds.), Transforming social work practice: Postmodern critical perspectives (pp. 195–208). Routledge.
Fook, J. (2004). Critical reflection and transformative possibilities. In L. Davis & P. Leonard (Eds.), Social work in a corporate era: Practice of power and resistance (pp. 28–42). Ashgate Publishing.
Hair, J. H., & O’Donoghue, K. (2009). Culturally relevant, socially just social work supervision: Becoming visible through a social constructionist lens. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18(1–2), 70–88. https://doi: 10.1080/15313200902874979
Hamilton, R. J., & Akhter, S. (2002). Psychometric properties of the multi-dimensional multi-attributional causality scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(5), 802–817.
Hoani, S., & Harris, L. (2009). Wānangahau: Taking rangahau to the people a wānanga way. Te Wānanga o Aotearoa.
Kadushin, A. (1992). Social work supervision: An updated survey. The Clinical Supervisor, 10, 9–27.
Kovach, K. (2006). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance (pp. 19–36). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Lusk, M., Terrazas, S., & Salcido, R. (2017). Critical cultural competence in social work supervision. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 41(5), 464–476. https://doi:10.1080/233 03131.2017.131380
Marsden, M. (2003). The woven universe: Selected writings of Rev. Māori Marsden. The Estate of Rev. Māori Marsden.
McDonald, M. ( 2017). Rangahau: Conceptualising authentic Māori identity. Wāhia Nga Ngaru, 2(1), 1–5.
Mead, H. M. (2003). Tikanga Māori Living by Māori values. Huia.
Pack, M. (2009). Clinical supervision: An interdisciplinary review of literature with implications for reflective practice in social work. Reflective Practice, 10(5), 657–668.
Pohatu, T. W. (2008). Takepū: Principled approaches to healthy relationships. In Proceedings of the Traditional Knowledge Conference. Te Tatau Pounamu: The Greenstone Door.
Pohatu, T. W. (2015). Mātauranga-ā-whānau – He Kōnae Aronui. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work. 27(4), 32–38.
Potts, K., & Brown, L. (2005). Becoming an anti oppressive researcher. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance (pp. 255–281). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Questions on Islam. (n.d.). What is the wisdom behind circumambulating the Kaaba seven times? What is the meaning of tawaf (circumambulation). https://questionsonislam.com/question/what-wisdom- behind-circumambulating-kaaba-seven-times-what- meaning-tawaf-circumambulation
Qur’an. (2016). The meaning of the Holy Qur’an, 22:26. Al Quran Academy.
Radan, S. M. (2009, September 12). Umrah: A journey towards spiritual enlightenment. Tribune Business News.
Rankine, M. (2019). The internal/external debate: The tensions within social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 32–44.
Ruwhiu, A. L. (2004). Cultural supervision: A journey within to strengthen without– A whanau tautoko mahi experience [Paper presentation]. Weaving together the strands of supervision, Supervision conference, Auckland College of Education, Auckland, New Zealand. (pp. 221-233).
Saleebey, D. (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed.). Longman.
Sema, Y. (2018). An empirical research on the relationship between umra worship and meaning in life and hopelessness. Special Issue of Religious Studies; Sivas, 22(3), 1687–1711.
Stats New Zealand. (2018). Census Totals by topic: National highlights. https://www.stats.govt.nz/information- releases/2018-census-totals-by-topic-national-highlights- updated
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. University of Otago Press.
Te Wānanga o Aotearoa. (2016). Te Wānanga o Aotearoa rangahau strategic plan, 2015–2019. Author.
Te Wānanga o Aotearoa. (2018). Kaitiakitanga – Post Graduate Diploma in Bicultural Professional Supervision [Programme document]. Author.
Thomas, C., & Davis, S. (2005). Bicultural strengths-based supervision. In M. Nash, R. Munford, & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Social work theories in action (pp. 189–204). Jessica Kingsley.
Thompson, M. (2008). Basic principles of Islam. Voice of Islam.
Tsui, M. S., O’Donoghue, K., & Ng, K. T. (2014). Culturally competent and diversity-sensitive clinical supervision: An international perspective. In C. F. Watkins Jr, & D. L. Mine (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 230–254). Wiley Blackwell.
Ul-Haq, S., & Westwood, R. (2012). The politics of knowledge, epistemological occlusion and Islamic management an organization knowledge. Organization, 19(2), 229–257.
Wallace, E. (2019). Ngā Aroro and social work supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(3), 20–31. https://doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss3id645
Walsh-Tapiata, W., & Webster, J. (2004). Do you have a supervision plan? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review,15–19.
Webber-Dreadon, E. (2020). Kaitiakitanga: A transformation of supervision. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32(3), 68–79.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
