A review of a primary mental health service 10 years on
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol27iss3id9Abstract
The past 10 years have seen a shift in mental health care in Aotearoa New Zealand towards early intervention and treatment at a primary care level providing a range of levels of mental health interventions in a variety of settings. Previously specialist mental health care had been the responsibility of community mental health teams and secondary service inpatient care which provided care for people with severe mental illness (3% of the population).
In this article, I look at the move towards the provision of primary mental health care. I describe and review the Mental Health Brief Intervention Service in South Canterbury, one of the earliest primary mental health services initiated by the South Canterbury District Health Board, which started in 2005. I present research fi from my Master’s thesis Mental Health Brief Intervention – does it work? An evaluation of practice, and discuss how the Mental Health Brief Intervention Service has made a positive change for general practitioners, the client, the interface with other services including secondary mental health services and service delivery in general. Forms of consumer feedback are discussed along with the changes in the service over the last 10 years. It is written by myself, a social worker, who played an integral part in initiating and establishing the service and continues to have an active role as a clinician within the Mental Health Brief Intervention Service. This article is written to provide social workers with an overview of the establishment of the Mental Health Brief Intervention Service and the impact on service delivery. The role of the social worker is discussed as is the role of other health professionals within the team.
References
Bathgate, D., Curtis, D., & Romans, S. (2001). The views of Otago urban and rural general practitioners on mental health services. New Zealand Medical Journal, 289-291.
Best Practice NZ. (2004). Depression patient orientated evidence that matters. Dunedin: Best Practice New Zealand.
Kessler, R.C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L.J., & Hiripi, E. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 959-76.
Miller, S. (2012). Manual 4 Documenting change: A primer on measurement, analysis and reporting. Chicago: International Center for Clinical Excellence.
Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing, preparing people for change (2nd ed.). Guilford: Guilford Press.
Ministry of Health. (2001). The New Zealand Primary Care Strategy. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health.
Ministry of Health. (2005). Te tahuhu – Improving mental health 2005-2015: The Second New Zealand Mental Health and Addiction Plan. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.
New Zealand Guidelines Group. (2008). Identification of common mental disorders and management of depression in primary care. An evidence-based best practice guideline. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Guidelines Group. Ministry of Health.
Oakley-Browne, M. A., Wells, E., Scott, J., & Kate, M. (2006). Te Rau Hinengaro: The New Zealand Mental Health Survey. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health.
Taylor, S. (2009). Mental Health Brief Intervention: Does it work? A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Social Welfare, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Taylor, S, & Briggs L. (2012). A mental health brief intervention in primary care: does it work? The Journal of Family Practice, 16 =(2):E1-5. PMID: 22312617.
Thomas, G. (2007). The power of the therapeutic relationship: Bringing balance to evidence-based practice. Aoteraroa New Zealand Social Work Review, 55-66.
World Health Organisation (2001). The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: New understanding, new hope. World Health Organisation.
www.blackdoginstitute.org.au/depression/inpregnancy/selftest.cfm (accessed 24/08/2015). www. primarymentalhealth.org.nz (accessed 9/04/2015).
www.southlink.co.nz (accessed 12/08/2015).
www.stanford.edu/~yesavage/GDS.html (accessed 24/08/2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
By completing the online submission process, you confirm you accept this agreement. The following is the entire agreement between you and the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) and it may be modified only in writing.
You and any co-authors
If you are completing this agreement on behalf of co-authors, you confirm that you are acting on their behalf with their knowledge.
First publication
By submitting the work you are:
- granting the ANZASW the right of first publication of this work;
- confirming that the work is original; and
- confirming that the work has not been published in any other form.
Once published, you are free to use the final, accepted version in any way, as outlined below under Copyright.
Copyright
You assign copyright in the final, accepted version of your article to the ANZASW. You and any co-authors of the article retain the right to be identified as authors of the work.
The ANZASW will publish the final, accepted manuscript under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This licence allows anyone – including you – to share, copy, distribute, transmit, adapt and make commercial use of the work without needing additional permission, provided appropriate attribution is made to the original author or source.
A human-readable summary of the licence is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, which includes a link to the full licence text.
Under this licence you can use the final, published version of the article freely – such as depositing a copy in your institutional research repository, uploading a copy to your profile on an academic networking site or including it in a different publication, such as a collection of articles on a topic or in conference proceedings – provided that original publication in Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work is acknowledged.
This agreement has no effect on any pre-publication versions or elements, which remain entirely yours, and to which we claim no right.
Reviewers hold copyright in their own comments and should not be further copied in any way without their permission.
The copyright of others
If your article includes the copyright material of others (e.g. graphs, diagrams etc.), you confirm that your use either:
- falls within the limits of fair dealing for the purposes of criticism and review or fair use; OR
- that you have gained permission from the rights holder for publication in an open access journal.
